Reply With Quote
Tim Duncan had a chance at a clutch game winning shot and missed.
TWO playoff games; won by SUCH a small margin (1 pt, then OT) - and not a SINGLE clutch game winning shot for the winning squad. BOTH games either tied or won on free-throws by the same player?
The cliche is "Refs swallow the whistle". Well, obviously, that hasn't happened. Without getting into whether they calls were valid or not, they may be unprecedented.
Tim Duncan had a chance at a clutch game winning shot and missed.
Hey, do yall think David $tern will be in person at the AT&T Center? It would be very ballsy if he did. I got 20 bucks that says he doesn't show. I think thats gonna be how we know he rigged this .
How many clutch shots does a team have to make to win a game- especially when at least one of the clutch players has already fouled out? There's usually enough time to force the Spurs to make ONE MORE - isn't there? So that it can always be said, "well they had a chance..." - yeah, they did, and Finley made up for his TO by making a of a 3 over some crappy Dallas defense.
Point is, Dallas didn't have to make a clutch game winning shot, either time.
The problem with the refs is that when they put the Spurs on the line at the end of games, the Spurs miss.
Umm, I'm not sure that's a problem with the refs.
Right, no clutch shots...lol...
I couldn't agree more!! It's kind of like the poker game where the guy loses, pulls his gun and says to the winner, deal again. The cards are going to be dealt over and over until the bully gets what he wants.
Clutch game winning or tying shots at the end of the games (you know, similar to the ones that the Spurs and every other playoff team in history has had to make to advance).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
