Reply With Quote
So those of "European ancestry" should have more babies because if not, in 25 years, Hispanics are going to be the largest ethnic group?
What a moron!
Anyone want to take a stab at WTF John Gibson is trying to get at?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,195193,00.html
Procreation Not Recreation
Thursday, May 11, 2006
By John Gibson
Make more babies. That's the lesson drawn out of two interesting stories over the last couple days.
First, a story Wednesday that half the kids under 5 years old in this country are minorities. By far, the greatest number are Hispanic.
Know what that means? Twenty-five years and the majority population is Hispanic.
Why is that? Hispanics are having more kids and others, notably the ones Hispanics call gabachos — white people — are having fewer.
Now in this country, European ancestry people — white people — are having kids at a rate that sustains the population, even grows it a bit.
That compares to Europe where the birthrate is in the negative zone. They're not having enough babies to sustain the population.
Consequently, they are inviting in more and more immigrants every year to take care of things, and those immigrants are having way more babies that the native population. Hence Eurabia.
Why aren't they having babies? Because babies get in the way of a prosperous and comfortable modern life. Peanut butter fingerprints on the leather seats in the BMW. The Euros in particular can't be bothered with kids.
To underscore that point, a second story Thursday reports that Vladimir Putin is so concerned about the declining, no imploding population of Russia he is paying couples to have babies.
Imagine: Procreating for cash in Mother Russia.
Putin has to take this step because at the rate things are going, Russia will lose 45 million people in the next 45 years. Russia will be at two-thirds of today's population.
This is not a good trend for Russia, and it won't be here either if it should happen.
To put it bluntly: We need more babies. Forget that zero population growth stuff of my poor, misled generation.
Why is this important? Because civilizations need populations to survive.
So far we're doing our part here in America, but Hispanics can't carry the whole load.
The rest of you: Get busy. Make babies.
Or put another way, a slogan for our times: Procreation not recreation.
That's My Word.
So those of "European ancestry" should have more babies because if not, in 25 years, Hispanics are going to be the largest ethnic group?
What a moron!
Interseting. Russia's president called for the same thing not too recently.
The anti-abortion forces are preparing to step their campaign to the level of anti-contraception.
Why such complicated plan? If your goal is to overtake hispanics in population, just wipe them out by force - it's cheaper and faster.
on a more serious note: Europe is having population "problems", which makes many here concerned, but not because "white" population is droping (well some do have a problem wiith that too), but because young population is droping. The population in Europe is aging and it could cause serious economical problems.
I think this is what the author is aiming at, although I don't really understand his approach... I mean you can't just start making babies and expect the situation to resolve itself
If you read just the 1st 1/2 ofthe article - it truly looks liek a call to "white" america to start procreating so they don't get over taken by those gosh darn hispanics.
this guys editor needs some help.
it. Let Hispanics become the majority. Then my kids can benefit from minority programs.
Of course, logic tells me once they become the majority, they will declare that they dont control the money in the population, therefore they still get the goodies.
Also, Spanish becomes the official US language. Greaaaaaaat.
He says that white people procrate at good enough rate in America.Why is that? Hispanics are having more kids and others, notably the ones Hispanics call gabachos ? white people ? are having fewer.
Now in this country, European ancestry people ? white people ? are having kids at a rate that sustains the population, even grows it a bit.
He is also pointing out the rate of Hispanics. The situation is good in America, there is enough young people there.
This is not the case in Europe. In Europe many see imigration (legal) as part of the solution, not part of the problem. It's true that people here also want that new people will be Slovenians, Germans, ect... It makes it easier for us and them.
What's so bad about a declining number in population? Haven't people been whining for years about there being too many people? Now the problem is resolving itself and we're unhappy? Good grief.
Smaller families = more resources for children = better education = better society
In europe (esp. eastern I hear) they are having the problem that there are not enough peopel being born to maintain thier societies infrastructure.
Eventually it will impload.
Except that a social pension scheme funded by workers will collapse, i.e. Social Security, Medicare, etc.
I have three kids. Is that a big family?
is that the fairness or the balance?
I'm with you fellas !!!
Canada has been paying folks for having babies for years. Nothing new.
More Babies? We have plenty. They're called Republicans. POHWNT3d
2 kids is the limit, if you have more than 2 kids you should be beaten and put on the single mother island. Abortion is a good thing.
With wit like yours, youre going to pwn this forum.
]-[4x0rZ ©
Last edited by DarkReign; 05-19-2006 at 03:01 PM.
Hmmmm, well at least us conservatives are your daddy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
