Reply With Quote
I'd highly recommend, though, for the future safety of your children...that you encourage them to keep far away from large financial districts, national landmarks, skyscrapers and major government complexes.
Then I'm sure they'll be completely safe.
I will admit that I was leaning toward President Bush because I thought he would keep my family safer than John Kerry.
But after the last debate President Bush gave me the impression he wants war to go on for eternity. I don't want that for my children.
John Kerry at least gives us the hope that we can see the light at the end of the tunnel and one day will have the terrorists under control.
Terrorists will never be totally eliminated because a new one is born everyday.
IMHO, a neverending war is not the answer I want for my kids and that is all President Bush seems to have to offer us.
I'd highly recommend, though, for the future safety of your children...that you encourage them to keep far away from large financial districts, national landmarks, skyscrapers and major government complexes.
Then I'm sure they'll be completely safe.
And also, I'd start piling up on bottled water...preferably the one from France. Just in case something ever happened to our water supply.
We all want what's best for our kids.
I don't understand how you can believe that anybody, regardless of party affiliation, wants the war to go on forever. I think Bush is doing something that Kerry can't seem to be able to do and still have a chance of winning.. that is he's avoiding making a big promise he can't keep. I think it's stupid to put a expiration date on a war and reconstruction. It just occured to me that with Kerry giving this war a timeline, well, wouldn't the terrorists just wait him out and rebuild to launch a new attack later?? They know Bush is going to stick this out, with Kerry, who knows.. he has a plan, but Lord knows what it is.
Kerry issued a time line but he isn't as bull headed as Bush and will make the necessary changes in war strategy as needed.
Not just "stay the course" even if the course is wrong.
I was undecided. Then I read the writings of a wise man named "Whottt" who pointed out that a vote for Kerry was a vote for "being forced to suck terrorist for the next 4 years." Heeding his advice and having only a desire to receive fellatio, not give, I have decided to vote against Kerry and for the man who actually feels that the US should hunt down and kill the Islamofascist bas s who get off on killing innocent men, women, and children, no matter how much he manages to terrorize the King's English.
Last edited by Marcus Bryant; 10-13-2004 at 06:03 PM.
Shouldn't that be terrahize?no matter how much he manages to terrorize the King's English.
I think they both suck but have always voted Republican in the past. The mister is very pro Bush (in more ways than one).
Plus, my daddy always told me that if I ever want to see my inheritence, I best vote Republican.
I too was once undecided- but now I am sure that they are both morons.
You should hear my mom.....damn Republican to the core. She's ruthless.
I think even I'd be embarrassed to repeat some of the things she used to say about Clinton......and now Kerry & Company.
I like Bush
Well they've been repeating themselves over and over again tonight. I wonder what progress any of them made tonight in convincing the undecided.
Wow......somebody following Whottt...especially on their political beliefs...incredibly stupid.
I have decided not to vote. I wanted to vote for Bush but dude is not doing much. I can't vote Democratic because they are stupid.
So, I'll wait for the next arena vote and then go to the polls.
What's stupid is your apparent inability to grasp that it was a facetious statement. Get a ing clue chump.Wow......somebody following Whottt...especially on their political beliefs...incredibly stupid.
Bush doesn't want the war to go on for eternity. He just has enough brain cells and/or smart people around him to realize it ain't gonna happen overnight.But after the last debate President Bush gave me the impression he wants war to go on for eternity.
I hate to break it to you, but your kids, my kids, our grandkids, all will still be fighting the assholes from the same gene pool who perpetrated 9/11.
I don't want the war to go on forever either. That said, I am a student of the history of the Middle East, radical Islam, and recognize the future for what it is.
Bush isn't a warhawk, he's just not prone to blowing sunshine up people's asses when he knows he can't deliver something (that Kerry wouldn't be able to either).
Opinionator,
Here's more reasons to vote for GBush...
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_c...conomists.html368 of the nation's leading economists from 44 states have signed an economic statement denouncing John Kerry's economic proposals. The group boasts six Nobel laureates, including recent winner and Professor of Economics at Arizona State University Edward C. Prescott, as well as six former chairs of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. America 's economists recognize that President Bush's pro-growth policies and across-the-board tax relief are the right policies for sustained growth – and they are urging voters not to turn back with John Kerry's tax and spend agenda.
Glenn Hubbard, Dean of the Columbia University Business School and former Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, said: "Ideas and response to events are the tests of economic leadership. President Bush's focus on raising long-term growth using well-timed tax cuts, opening markets, and seeking to limit regulatory and litigation costs has furthered the global economic expansion. The administration's leadership in the War on Terror, the management of terrorism risk, and restoring investor confidence also limited potentially damaging downturns of confidence. Senator Kerry's recipe of limiting job creation by raising tax rates on entrepreneurs and our most successful global companies, while radically expanding the size and scope of government will limit future economic growth and lead to increasingly grim fiscal choices."
And
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2.html?sub=new
BAGHDAD, Oct. 12 -- Local insurgents in the city of Fallujah are turning against the foreign fighters who have been their allies in the rebellion that has held the U.S. military at bay in parts of Iraq's Sunni Muslim heartland, according to Fallujah residents, insurgent leaders and Iraqi and U.S. officials.
Relations are deteriorating as local fighters negotiate to avoid a U.S.-led military offensive against Fallujah, while foreign fighters press to attack Americans and their Iraqi supporters. The disputes have spilled over into harsh words and sporadic violence, with Fallujans killing at least five foreign Arabs in recent weeks, according to witnesses.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
