Reply With Quote
No
Never
Ever
Yes or no?
No
Never
Ever
ask ducks.
I would in a heartbeat. Duncan is on the decline, while James is on the rise. That one seems simple.
Agree.
That's why you're a Kings fan.
Definantly. Lebron is going to be something great. Not saying Duncan isn't but Lebron has a lot of potential.
Duncan for Lebron? No.
Anyone else on the Spurs for Lebron? yeah. In a heartbeat.
How many years left of dominance do you honestly think Duncan has left? 2.......maybe 3?
I'm just being a realist.
Duncan for LeBron in a heartbeat.
It's not just about talent, you can't trade the piece of your franchise that helped win you three championships for anybody.
Even if Duncan is "declining" (watch the playoff series vs the Mavs and tell me if that was declining), you can't just do that because Duncan is the franchise guy. LeBron is still young and will be the NBA's biggest star in about 3 years, but the Spurs can win the le now, so you keep pieces there that can consistantly win you a le.
The Spurs are only le contenders for about another three years, after that, IMO, Duncan will be out of his prime.
Spurs can win another championship or two with Duncan around. Could they with LeBron? LeBron isn't the problem the Spurs need to fix, they need rebounding mostly. Duncan is a top 10 player in NBA history by the time his career is up, you can't trade that away.
If this playoff run was any indication, several.How many years left of dominance do you honestly think he has?
I think the point is that he has had years of dominance, and will have more. Lebron has won what, one playoff series?
This was his 1st playoff appearance moron.
It is not a matter of if tim or leberon it is tim and lebron. Lebrons contract is examerly cheap for his performace I could see holt paying lebron that kind of money without complaining
My point exactly. Duncan only has a few more years of dominance. LeBron has x amount of years left and will be the best player in the league for years to come. Especially with the way the rules have been changing. They are changing to benefit players like LeBron, not Duncan.
To each his own.
BTW, Duncan is the reason the Spurs are contenders every year. Without him, the Spurs are a good 4-5th seed in the west. Not much else.
but shaq has wade
dirk has nash
WHo does Tim have?
I think a
tim lebron combo would be deadly
Duncan was a bargain on his rookie contract too.
Look who LeBron played with.
Just imagine if they did bring in LeBron... who would be the starting PF or Center?
True. But I'm looking into the future. LeBron actually has one. Duncan is nearing his decline. And for big men like himself, it is usually a quick one.
Please don't think I'm knocking on Duncan, the guy is a beast and would make anyone's team a contender.
And for big men like himself, it is usually a quick one.
Big men's careers are the longest-lived in the league.
...and it took him 3 seasons...IN THE EAST. Yeah, he's dominant, all right.
Your Kings never had a best player in NBA, the Spurs do. Duncan will stay with Spurs.
Your whole Kings team may probably be sold somewhere else soon.
I'm a big fan of LeBron, but I see Wade being almost as good. Wade plays with more heart and desire, and it'd be great if somehow he were ever a Spur (but he won't).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
