Reply With Quote
There, fixed it for you -- except for the spelling and grammar.
Here you go. A Black canaidate who tells it like it is.
http://www.vernonrobinson.com/twilightzone.shtml
And you want to know what the rest of the libs say. Just go to his
website.
www.robinsonforcongress.com
And click on his latest ads.......
I cant wait for your response.
There, fixed it for you -- except for the spelling and grammar.
Well, the flying saucer bit seemed like an accurate representation of your beliefs....
He-He-He......told you so.....
Oh damn -- xray just got me.
I can't believe I fell for his devious plot!! What a remarkably well-sprung trap!
dike also
n.
1. An embankment of earth and rock built to prevent floods.
2. Chiefly British. A low wall, often of sod, dividing or enclosing lands.
3. A barrier blocking a passage, especially for protection.
4. A raised causeway.
5. A ditch; a channel.
6. Geology. A long mass of igneous rock that cuts across the structure of adjacent rock.
tr.v. diked, also d dik·ing, dyk·ing dikes, s
1. To protect, enclose, or provide with a dike.
2. To drain with dikes or ditches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Middle English, from Old English dc, trench; see dhgw- in Indo-European Roots, and from Old Norse dki, ditch.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diker n.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
also dike
n. Offensive Slang
1. Used as a disparaging term for a lesbian.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Origin unknown.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
y adj.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
n 1: offensive terms for a lesbian who is noticeably masculine [syn: butch, dike] 2: a barrier constructed to contain the flow of water or to keep out the sea [syn: dam, dike, levee] v : enclose with a dike; "dike the land to protect it from water" [syn: dike]
Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
If God is truly everywhere, then God could certainly be a dike or a .
Is that to say that most blacks don't know what they are talking about?Here you go. A Black canaidate who tells it like it is.
Last edited by SA210; 06-26-2006 at 04:19 PM.
I can't believe that's a real campaign ad. How embarrassing.
Seriously...
It reminds me of something you might see on The Simpsons or The Daily Show, if they were satirizing Republican ads.
Whenever they agree with us...
I am sure you were looking for a different reaction, something like "gee now I see how silly I am" or "wow, you are so right".
This is nothing more than mental masturbation. The guy could be green, purple, or whatever.
It is still little more than
Liberals are such ing pussies and republicans are such greedy selfish suckers I can't stand how those are our only two choices. Complete whiny ing crybaby pussies or selfish greedy evil mother ers. Nice Democracy. Save that third party fairy tale bull for someone else. It's almost like a bipartisan dictatorship. Will some other party come around during my lifetime please. People act like everyone is unique and different-but they're all either liberal or conservative. that. Anyway that's my rant on that.
If everyone who thought voting Independent was a waste of time actually voted that way anyway, there would be enough votes to make a lot of noise. Unfortunately, too many people get scared into voting for the lesser of two evils, or they don't vote at all.Save that third party fairy tale bull for someone else.
Why are people afraid to vote for someone they know will lose? What do YOU have to lose, other than an hour standing in line?
Of course, other things need to happen in order to help weaken the bi-opoly on government... No elected official should ever be able to serve without winning a majority of the vote. Eliminate pluralities. Whether you do that by run-off elections or reform the voting process where voters can order candidates by preference (the better option, because run-offs cost more money), you give Independents more confidence in voting for the candidate that truly represents their beliefs, because they will no longer be afraid that voting Independent gives the leg up to a Republican or Democrat.
Funny how a lot of ads and visuals that speak to the problem of illegal immigration use a video of said illegal immigrants scaling a wall.
what does that they about the effectiveness of the build a wall idea?
What part did you find embarrassing?
A Black canaidate who tells it like it is.
All of it.
Not embarrassing to me personally, but I would hope to anyone it's meant to represent... Guess not.
^^He told it like it is. What part of it is untrue? You may not like the message,
but truth is truth.
But are you saying that most black people/candidates don't tell it like it is?
He hit on every single AM Radio talking point and he did it over Twilight Zone music.
Like I said, it looked like something you'd see on The Simpsons or The Daily Show if they were making fun of a Republican campaign ad.
Your post deserves no comment. Quit trying to paint me as a racist, you
are the one who called a Hispanic a coconut.
You say that as if there is an objective truth to the propriety of any of the talking points that he regurgitates. There simply isn't -- you have your beliefs about them, but your subjective beliefs are not an objective truth. Accordingly, he tells things the way you see them and to you, it's truth. I largely disagree with his agenda and wouldn't vote for him. It makes no difference to me whether he's white, black, green, or polka-dotted; it must make some sort of difference to you, though -- and I think SA210 is right to call you on that or at least seek clarification of whatever point it is you're trying to make. Really, what difference does it make to you that this guy is African-American? Aren't his beliefs and his viewpoint more important than the color of his skin?
Gee are we being really, really, philosophical. Look at all those nice words:
regurgitates, subjective and objective and accordingly, clarification. And all the
right buzz phrases: "your beliefs about them. Objective truth. The way you see them
He has an agenda. And the real winner: Makes no difference to me whether he's
white, black, green or polka-dotted. You got it covered.
Except
You forgot to say what really bothers you. He is black and says those things.
Therefore he is not worthy of the regressive liberal dimm-o-crap seal of
approval. Just like your friend, SA210.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
