Reply With Quote
Parker is not big in the postseason
wtf are you smoking?
seriously we never put that legit #2 player next to Duncan, we thought it was Man but that was only a 1 postseason affair, and Parker is not big in the postseason
SPurs need to bring over Scola to help Duncan, Spurs owe Duncan
Parker is not big in the postseason
wtf are you smoking?
duncan owes the spurs to play like he did during the postseason all year
Duncan got the Spurs HC in the west, and would of had it in the Finals too
what more do you want?
30+pts 12+rbs 4ast+ 3blks in a 7 games series against the Mavs not enough?
What does getting a legit #2 player have to do with owing Duncan.
The guy already has 3 rings, and plenty of success. I'm pretty sure he's quite satisfied
with what this franchise has done for him, and how they've surrounded him with quality
players.
Your inference is that Scola would be a legit #2 player next to Duncan. That's a huge leap in assumption.
If you are going to start a thread like this, at least make some sense. A legit #2 would be someone like (Spurs fans will scoff at the idea, but) Ray Allen. Or, Gilbert Arenas. And, you come in and say SCOLA is a legit #2 player to play alongside Duncan?
Come on. Be foreal.
scola would like the 4 option on the spurs
at least Duncan would be the only one getting rebounds
Duncan's given every indication that he's quite happy with Parker and Manu as his running mates. They are the trio that are the Spurs core, along with Bowen.
The role players have changed over the years, and will have to change again this year to respond to the "small ball" athleticism and speed that the new rules and types of NBA players we are seeing lately. But the Spurs can do this. They are only 1 or 2 key signings away from another NBA le. They were almost there this year, remember. The Mavs series could have gone either way, and I am certain the Spurs could have beaten the Heat.
That's awfully generous.
I think most franchises would take their chances entering each season with 3 players like Duncan, Parker, and Ginobili. Some of you people act as if the Spurs have perpetually underachieved in the last 4 or 5 years. If it weren't for .4 in 2004 and whatever the we'll end up calling the last 30 seconds of regulation in Game 7 of the Mavericks series, it's quite likely that the Spurs would have just played in their 4th consecutive Finals. It's taken some pretty significant feats by elite level teams over the last few years for other teams to knock out the Spurs; that's a fact that's frequently lost on some around here.
Forget Scola. Wanna get on timmy's good side? bring in Chandler and Nocioni.
Go ahead and trade em Parker and Ginobili for that NKD and do that.
Scola doesn't rebound. He doesn't block shots. He doesn't defend very well. What he does is score in the post. We have that covered already.
averaged over 20 points a game in the postseason this year.and Parker is not big in the postseason
What the more do you want from the kid.
Buy a clue.
too bad those are the 2 players I would NOT trade. I'd trade everthing else though
I think Chicago would be amenable to a Tyson Chandler and Nocioni trade for Tim Duncan.
Spur fans can get real greedy sometimes.
The spurs have won 2 championships with the core guys we have.
What more do you want?
Come on man. u really think I included Duncan in the everything else?????
nkdlunch,
Come on yourself, man. You really think Chicago will give up both Chandler and Nocioni to San Antonio without getting at least one of the Spurs big three in return?
we need to trade parker for billups and manu for DWade
read my post again.
Spurs owe Duncan??????!!!
Don't you mean Holt? If you're talking about the offseason...
and, why the would you want scola?
Forget scola... get someone that's already proven.
Spurs owe nothing to Duncan.
This is a comment from someonewho obviously doesn't know Duncan's competiveness. Like TD is just going to "mail it in" for the rest of his career.
read my post again.
Fair enough. Mine didn't have a smiley face, but I was not being serious either.
Any rational person would know that someone proposing a Chandler and Nocioni trade for Duncan is not being serious.
It was sarcasm. Apologies for not including a smiley face.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
