Reply With Quote
"a point guard who doesn't soil his pants under pressure"----hilarious
so the spurs enter this summer looking for rebounding, a point guard who doesn't soil his pants under pressure, and a decent size forward who could defend the perimeter and they end up with...elson, butler, bonner, vaughn, and 87 year old eric williams. meanwhile fans explode in orgasmic bliss because the spurs have avoided the luxury tax threshold and are poised to make the most of the rest of timmy d's career...starting in 2037.
this has been a weak summer for the spurs. stop kidding yourselves otherwise.
"a point guard who doesn't soil his pants under pressure"----hilarious
You forgot Melzer.
yeah, the spurs got 2 buckets of bullcrap and still can't get a rebound.
Who were they supposed to get? No one has answered that yet because there wasnt anyone worth a available to realistically get this offseason. With 3 all star caliber players on one team you need pieces to fit, not more superstars.
I like your avatar. Good taste.
Exactly how many times are you going to say the exact same thing?
Until somebody answers the damn question with a realistic answer. Almost everyone es about the Spurs offseason, but NOT ONE PERSON has offered any kind of solution this year that is any better. So answer the question. Or at least stop ing about the FA signings without having any better solutions.
Jackie Butler
Matt Bonner
Jacque Vaughn
Francisco Elson
Eric Williams
Overall
So who would you have gotten instead that could have been realistically obtained this offseason and would have offered major improvement without completely overspending?Jackie Butler
Matt Bonner
Jacque Vaughn
Francisco Elson
Eric Williams
Overall
Butler, Bonner and Vaughn were pretty good pickups. Butler was steal. Bonner is a guy who should be useful. Vaughn was as good as the Spurs were going to do for the minimum. Whether a minimum deal should be what was used to get a point guard is a different question.
My major beef is Elson. I just don't see how anyone can justify using most of the MLE on a guy who was Denver's opening day 12th man. I've listed at least ten other players I would have liked the Spurs to have gone after other than Elson.
When looking at the big picture, Elson was the Spurs' big money signing of the offseason. That said, the Spurs are lucky I give them two stars.
Butler is the only notable pickup for the spurs this offseason, bad part is it might take him a year or 2 to develop into a good role player.
Elson gets as many stars as Eric Williams?Jackie Butler
Matt Bonner
Jacque Vaughn
Francisco Elson
Eric Williams
Overall
C'mon now, I know you dislike the guy...but that much?
I really hope WIlliams and Elson come out and kick ass.
Just so the ing bas s have to find something new to about.
Dont worry, they'll find something to about. They always do.
How about Barry for Najera.
Why would we want another PF on our roster and trade our best shooter?
I think the Spurs have done a fine job this off-season. This was a very weak free agent class and we couldn't get anything in the draft. I like Bonner, Butler, and Vaughn. I will have to see what Elson will bring and if Williams will even be on our roster this season.
There's a different expectation level between a throw-in and a player you spend most of your offseason money on.
That's what Mavs' fans are hopiing for and counting on. But maybe, like Diop, Butler comes to camp in the best shape of his life, maximizes his potential and significantly surpases his previous performance which, particularly offensively, has been better than Diop had shown up until last year.
Found it interesting that 82games.com first four top 5 man units for Denver were:
1 Miller-Buckner-Anthony-Camby-Elson
2 Miller-Buckner-Anthony-Martin-Elson
3 Miller-Patterson-Anthony-Camby-Elson
4 Watson-Miller-Anthony-Martin-Elson
Because apparently, the Spurs execs don't feel the same as you. Nor do the vast majority of sports analysts, who are all saying Elson and Butler are both good pick ups. What makes you think you know more than them?
Jermaine O'Neal was the 12th man on the bench his entire 3-4 years in Portland, and then he was traded to Indiana to become their franchise player. Lots of players sit on the bench on one team but can actually play, they just don't fit in that team's system.
Based on scouting reports, I think Elson will be a decent starting center. He'll probably split minutes with Bonner a lot, depending on match ups, and while Butler gets adjusted. But Butler could take over the starting spot by the ASG.
Well, I'm just observing from a fan's point-of-view, and while I would call this summer anything but a gold mine for free agency overall and pickups for the Spurs, I think the Spurs patched up a few spots. They really didn't have that many options. I was worried Butler would end up staying in New York. Anyway, its all fans' right to criticize, but I still have faith in Spurs mgt. and realize that its hard for any team to maintain a trio of talent like the Spurs have in Tim, Manu and Tony. Sure, it'd be nice to have
Ben Wallace at center and Chauncey Billups backing up Tony, but that's unrealistic. And I think the Spurs made some very wise moves in making a contending team next season while leaving ample cap room to strengthen the roster next summer.
You're missing the point, honey. The Spurs management team is supposed to overspend and do as much as they possibly can to ensure that we have 5 all-star players starting. And who doesn't want to play for the Spurs? Huh? The only reason we didn't get Ben Wallace was because HoltCat was too cheap.
Duh.
Spurs fans are going to about something, particularly after a season in which ended in disappointment. Don't know if you were around when we traded Rasho and shortly thereafter when the best centers made their verbal commitments. First, there was joy in the land that the terrible Rasho (who should never have been allowed on the court because of his awfulness) and his awful contract were gone. Then, when Wallace signed, then Mohammed, lo, there was panic in the land. People were willing to have Rasho back, or to overpay his successor. There was much panic and much ing about the cheap owners who will do everything they can to cripple the team if it means saving money. Now we've got something, and for not much money, and that's something new to about - we didn't spend enough, we need better players, what are they thinking?
Personally, Butler interests me (though the thought that we are excited to pick up NY's third string center is funny), Elson doesn't. I think we've added some servicable scrubs, maybe they'll pan out to more. Great, if so. The core is still there, and if they can stay healthy, that's what will truly make the difference.
The Mavs still have to contend with what many must consider to be the best trifectia on any NBA franchise- Tim, Manu and Tony. From Bruce to Elson, the rest are role players. The Spurs have traditionally done a good job of defining roles and players sticking to them. I don't see next year as a looming disappointment.
The vast majority of analysts have not said that. Even the local writers have said the Spurs have not improved, except financially. The Spurs themselves have made comments aimed at lowering fans' expectations of the two guys.
Surely do not tell me that you just compared a very young rookie Jermaine O'Neal to a 30-year old Francicso Elson.Jermaine O'Neal was the 12th man on the bench his entire 3-4 years in Portland, and then he was traded to Indiana to become their franchise player. Lots of players sit on the bench on one team but can actually play, they just don't fit in that team's system.
The biggest compliment I have read in a scouting report is that he is a capable back-up center.Based on scouting reports, I think Elson will be a decent starting center.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
