...i am calling it now. USC wins it all in 2006. btw, i have grown tired of these stupid ing t.u. fans trying to tell me USC did not win a BCS le (there is no such thing) or this and that crap in 2003. lets make this clear, since obviously some of you have very short memories....
1. USC was ranked #1 by the coaches poll and the AP poll at the end of the season in 2003 going into the bowls
2. BCS had USC #3
3. naturally, when USC won over #4 michigan in their bowl....AP left them #1 b/c they were already # ing 1
4. lsu was number #2 and played #3 ou, so obviously one cannot put them over the #1 team when they were NEVER #1 to begin with and did not beat the #1 team
5. the ONLY reason the coaches poll put lsu ahead of the Trojans (who were #1 going into their bowl game) is b/c they were contractually forced
6. the BCS was put into place to put the #1 and #2 teams together, never to decide the national champion. that obviously failed miserably in 2003 and was why the BCS started to get tinkered with
...now you t.u. fans can argue this all you want, but not only will you look foolish in doing so...you will be arguing against FACT and LOGIC. good luck assholes...
EDIT: here is some proof; read #10 towards the bottom.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...moments/2.html
Last edited by johngateswhiteley; 08-08-2006 at 08:31 AM.
Good luck. The starting QB is gone. The starting RB is gone. The backup RB is gone. Some other holes on both sides in other positions need filled. They'ill be lucky if they only lose two games - I'm thinking more like three. I think they'll go to a bowl game - maybe even a BCS bowl game - but it won't be for the championship. I'm looking at the tOSU/Texas winner, WVU, Notre Dame, and possibly Auburn as contenders for the BCS championship.
USC and So Cal can suck my left nut. I don't give a about 2003 when you SHARED a national championship. The only thing I care about is that the 'best' team in the history of college football got their ass handed to them by UT. The current, undisputed, not having to share, National Champs. So suck on that nut for a while. Hook'em!
Must suck to start a thread & get pimp slapped with a dose of reality.
Must suck to start a thread & get pimp slapped with a dose of reality.
nope. its fun to start a thread and then get a couple responses from baffoons. you don't have an answer and must change the subject...its quite wonderful actually.
...and i am goint to take all your money in FFB.
What's even more fun was watching dumbass Leinart trying to explain how he still thought his team was better after finally playing a REAL football team and getting their soft California football playin' ass handed to them, that is some serious fun. I hope him and his dad had a nice cry session together, and I will enjoy watching Leinart continue to fail as an NFL QB. He and Bush both know who the real Heisman Trophy winner was, and he ran circles around that USC defense all day long. I just hope we get another shot at you chumps this season. Just remember it's real hard to talk about your wonderful USC football team when you're suckin' all the time. See ya on the field Nancy.
I'm sure whitely here will have some long excuse on how USC was actually the better team.
What's even more fun was watching dumbass Leinart trying to explain how he still thought his team was better after finally playing a REAL football team and getting their soft California football playin' ass handed to them, that is some serious fun. I hope him and his dad had a nice cry session together, and I will enjoy watching Leinart continue to fail as an NFL QB. He and Bush both know who the real Heisman Trophy winner was, and he ran circles around that USC defense all day long. I just hope we get another shot at you chumps this season. Just remember it's real hard to talk about your wonderful USC football team when you're suckin' all the time. See ya on the field Nancy.
...and you're the definition of a deaf, dumb, and stupid (basically t.u.) fan. what an idiotic post...
Actually it's not an idiotic post. Leinarts cares only about himself, that's why he is still holding out for his 10th pick money. Ask anyone except an aggy or a trojan and they will tell you Texas would win 7/10 games if not more.
...actually, no they wouldn't it would be the other way around. apparently you did not watch the rose bowl, but i won't get into that further.
Leinart does not only care about himself, and who are you to judge? you know nothing about him or his situation.
Dude you are the lamest ing college forum poster of all time--more so than my brother Marcus. Are you serious? I am honestly starting to think you are a troll--you are purposely being all the agggy you can be.
You're so much of a hardcore aggie you actually root for USC for the entire season now. That's pretty erotic.
I don't think UT or SC will win the le this year. Guess that still makes me a "stupid t.u." fan...because you know...we all think alike. :p
I have actually seen the rosebowl many times, nothing I see shows USC could beat Texas 7 times. Leinart couldn't of done any better than 75% passing and Texas' D was to fast for bush. Remember Drew Kelson, ran side by side with Bush down the sidelines, USC fans know nothing about football because they actually think RB was the best player on the team, when in reality without Lendale White USC would of never made it to the rose bowl anyways.
USC had NO answer for Vince aswell, even though their defense was geared to stop him. Like Texas' was geared to stop bush, which they did.
Yeah. It's like Keith Jackson said, Texas defense is built for speed, but power beats speed. And anyone with a decent fball IQ (mine is incredibly low and I knew this) would tell you that LenDale would have been a far bigger problem for UT than Reggie. Reggie got that touchdown run, and a bull 27 yard catch in garbage time--subtract those two plays and you got an underacheiving back that wasn't even in the game for ONE crucial play.
Those Aggie USC fans say how much of a great coach Caroll is--If he was that great, why did he go with LenDale in every single tight spot? Why both times on fourth and short?
Cuz he knew Bush was getting his locked down. Even if you look at his paper stats, he still underacheived for being so ing hyped.
Aggie Trojan fans are like the new Sooners.
USC was sooo good, yet UT beat them by running the same play pretty much the entire ing game....and with that single play, Jamaal Charles was getting about 7 yrds a carry, and Selvin was not fumbling, and Ramonce sliced their bull D right up the middle for a 27 yrd touchdown run.
Bring it on ho!
BTW, welcome to the league.
True.
Realism is somewhat harsh to some.
Who then Mikey?
Buckeyes?
ND?
WVU has a pretty good shot because of the sched but will prob have to play a team that played a harder sched.
Now who wants Arkansas to beat that ass?
Damn, I'm torn now!
I do...should be a good game...hopefully the piggies own the condoms
...wow, you really are blind.
So blind that he actually becomes a homer for a team completely unassociated with his own?
Sorry, it's simple truth. Tell me 5 reasons why you think USC could beat Texas in 7/10 games.
I know you can't, you will just say some lameass thing like like that or like you did in other threads to when you were proved to be an idiot.
...i am done. you guys are complete morons.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
