Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    The Mother ers

    ====================

    August 24, 2006
    Evolution Major Vanishes From Approved Federal List

    By CORNELIA DEAN

    Evolutionary biology has vanished from the list of acceptable fields of study for recipients of a federal education grant for low-income college students.

    The omission is inadvertent, said Katherine McLane, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education, which administers the grants. “There is no explanation for it being left off the list,” Ms. McLane said. “It has always been an eligible major.”

    ( wow, what a co-incidence! When in doubt, always assume lying from these mofos )

    Another spokeswoman, Samara Yudof, said evolutionary biology would be restored to the list, but as of last night it was still missing.

    If a major is not on the list, students in that major cannot get grants unless they declare another major, said Barmak Nassirian, associate executive director of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. Mr. Nassirian said students seeking the grants went first to their college registrar, who determined whether they were full-time students majoring in an eligible field.

    “If a field is missing, that student would not even get into the process,” he said.

    That the omission occurred at all is worrying scientists concerned about threats to the teaching of evolution.

    One of them, Lawrence M. Krauss, a physicist at Case Western Reserve University, said he learned about it from someone at the Department of Education, who got in touch with him after his essay on the necessity of teaching evolution appeared in The New York Times on Aug. 15. Dr. Krauss would not name his source, who he said was concerned about being publicly identified as having drawn attention to the matter.

    ( exaclty, the Rove/Repug KGB are famous for intimidating dissenters )


    An article about the issue was posted Tuesday on the Web site of The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Dr. Krauss said the omission would be “of great concern” if evolutionary biology had been singled out for removal, or if the change had been made without consulting with experts on biology. The grants are awarded under the National Smart Grant program, established this year by Congress. (Smart stands for Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent.)

    The program provides $4,000 grants to third- or fourth-year, low-income students majoring in physical, life or computer sciences; mathematics; technology; engineering; or foreign languages deemed “critical” to national security.

    The list of eligible majors (which is online at ifap.ed.gov/dpcletters/attachments/GEN0606A.pdf) is drawn from the Education Department’s “Classification of Instructional Programs,” or CIP (pronounced “sip”), a voluminous and detailed classification of courses of study, arranged in a numbered system of sections and subsections.

    Part 26, biological and biomedical sciences, has a number of sections, each of which has one or more subsections. Subsection 13 is ecology, evolution, systematics and population biology. This subsection itself has 10 sub-subsections. One of them is 26.1303 — evolutionary biology, “the scientific study of the genetic, developmental, functional, and morphological patterns and processes, and theoretical principles; and the emergence and mutation of organisms over time.”

    Though references to evolution appear in listings of other fields of biological study, the evolutionary biology sub-subsection is missing from a list of “fields of study” on the National Smart Grant list — there is an empty space between line 26.1302 (marine biology and biological oceanography) and line 26.1304 (aquatic biology/limnology).

    Students cannot simply list something else on an application form, said Mr. Nassirian of the registrars’ association. “Your declared major maps to a CIP code,” he said.

    Mr. Nassirian said people at the Education Department had described the omission as “a clerical mistake.” But it is “odd,” he said, because applying the subject codes “is a fairly mechanical task. It is not supposed to be the subject of any kind of deliberation.”

    “I am not at all certain that the omission of this particular major is unintentional,” he added. “But I have to take them at their word.”

    ( naive idiot, NEVER take the Repugs at their word )

    Scientists who knew about the omission also said they found the clerical explanation unconvincing, given the furor over challenges by the religious right to the teaching of evolution in public schools. “It’s just awfully coincidental,” said Steven W. Rissing, an evolutionary biologist at Ohio State University.

    Jeremy Gunn, who directs the Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief at the American Civil Liberties Union, said that if the change was not immediately reversed “we will certainly pursue this.”

    Dr. Rissing said removing evolutionary biology from the list of acceptable majors would discourage students who needed the grants from pursuing the field, at a time when studies of how genes act and evolve are producing valuable insights into human health.

    “This is not just some kind of nicety,” he said. “We are doing a terrible disservice to our students if this is yet another example of making sure science doesn’t offend anyone.”

    Dr. Krauss of Case Western said he did not know what practical issues would arise from the omission of evolutionary biology from the list, given that students would still be eligible for grants if they declared a major in something else — biology, say.

    “I am sure an enterprising student or program director could find a way to put themselves in another slot,” he said. “But why should they have to do that?”

    Mr. Nassirian said he was not so sure. “Candidly, I don’t think most administrators know enough about this program” to help students overcome the apparent objection to evolutionary biology, he said. Undergraduates would be even less knowledgeable about the issue, he added.

    Dr. Krauss said: “Removing that one major is not going to make the nation stupid, but if this really was removed, specifically removed, then I see it as part of a pattern to put ideology over knowledge. And, especially in the Department of Education, that should be abhorred.”
    Last edited by boutons_; 08-24-2006 at 03:29 PM.

  2. #2
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    Geology will be next...we can't have people finding out the earth is more than 6000 years old, after all.

  3. #3
    Wisconsin Spurs Fan Dre_7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    6,507
    Boutons, you are reaching now. Not everything that happens in the world is a repug bible-thumper literalist theorcacy conspiracy theory.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    "Not everything that happens in the world"

    not the whole world, just anything in the Executive branch. no reaching at all. now that this is exposed, it will probably be corrected, but it's Repug/Bible-thumper dirty tricks in support "Repug science".

  5. #5
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    I'm sure when boutons gets a hard on watching Golden Girls on AMC that he blames that on Bush too.

  6. #6
    Ruffy RuffnReadyOzStyle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    24,209
    This is not a reach at all.

    The religious right has been attacking evolution for decades now, with good effect. I mean, over 50% of Americans believe that intelligent design is science (it is not, as has been proved by evolutionary scientists and in a court) and that humans didn't evolve along with the rest of nature.

    yeah this is real. 13 states mandate the teaching intelligent design in their science classrooms! ID IS NOT SCIENCE!!! That is the strength of the religious right in the US, and sadly they are growing in Oz too.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    The inane, less twerp throws his content-free rotten tomato and then grabs his crotch (actually, just still trying to find his ) and claims, faith-based, that he's "owned" boutons_, etc.

  8. #8
    Gotta Fly, to Old to drive. BIG IRISH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    753
    Boutons has a point.

    I think mine is better expressed

    My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.
    Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

    or in this case:

    Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
    Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955), "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941

    to make it simple, for those that are human

    When I do good, I feel good; when I do bad, I feel bad, and that is my religion.
    Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •