Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Signs of life: brain-damaged woman stuns doctors with her tennis skills

    The brain scan study of the 23-year-old, who suffered serious brain damage in a traffic accident, suggests that some seemingly unaware patients may understand more than had been thought.

    The findings could have a big impact on decisions about whether to switch off life support for those in a persistent vegetative state.

    Adrian Owen, of the British Medical Research Council's cognition and brain sciences unit in Cambridge, said the vegetative state, in which a patient emerges from a coma and appears awake but shows no signs of awareness, was poorly understood.

    "It is one of the most ethically troublesome conditions in modern medicine," he said.
    Michael Schiavo, on the other hand, was overheard to exclaim, "Whew! Dodged that one."

  2. #2
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    107

  3. #3
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    Not that she could have commented anyway....

  4. #4
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Not that she could have commented anyway....
    Maybe not today...but, how 'bout a few years from now? That is, if she hadn't been murdered.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    There is a huge range of brain damage.

    Given how costly and open-ended the care is, I figure the type of analysis done on Owen will become more common.

    Everyone should have a legal do ent spelling out exactly how they want one's own case handled.

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    Maybe not today...but, how 'bout a few years from now? That is, if she hadn't been murdered.
    She wasn't murdered. Nothing that was done was against the law, and every level of court had their shot at this. They all agreed that Michael had the say and the authority to decide. It's funny that the Fundies are all about the sanc y of marriage and the bond between a man and a woman...right up to the point that someone does something they disagree with. Phucking Pharisees.

    Yoni not agreeing = drama.

  7. #7
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    She wasn't murdered. Nothing that was done was against the law, and every level of court had their shot at this. They all agreed that Michael had the say and the authority to decide. It's funny that the Fundies are all about the sanc y of marriage and the bond between a man and a woman...right up to the point that someone does something they disagree with. Phucking Pharisees.

    Yoni not agreeing = drama.
    Murder? Euthenized? Mercy Killing? She was alive and then she was dead -- because of the actions of someone other than herself. What do you call it? It's not suicide. It's not an accident. It's not even an illness. It's starvation. A preventable cause of death -- easily preventable, I add. They call the treatment, now get this, food.

  8. #8
    Spurs love forever RobinsontoDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Post Count
    3,000
    yoni did you know her cerebral cord and most of her brain tissue was fluid? she was never going to retain consciousness.

  9. #9
    If you can't slam with the best then jam with the rest sabar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,628
    Murder is the unlawful killing of another human, sorry.
    The most you can say is that it is homicide. But then so is capital punishment, war, self-defense, necessity, euthanasia, use of deadly force by police, and so forth.

    You can't argue on the grounds of semantics unless you are also going to abolish the death penalty, make self-defense illegal, be against euthanasia, and only allow non-lethal force by the police.

    A better arguement?
    Consent. Unfortunately the blame lies on the families. You should CLEARLY state WELL in advance of your death how you want to be treated.

  10. #10
    Banned George W Bush's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    784
    I'm Pro-Death.

  11. #11
    Veteran velik_m's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    9,152
    Murder? Euthenized? Mercy Killing? She was alive and then she was dead -- because of the actions of someone other than herself. What do you call it? It's not suicide. It's not an accident. It's not even an illness. It's starvation. A preventable cause of death -- easily preventable, I add. They call the treatment, now get this, food.
    Was she alive? Giving that there is no clear cut definition of life, how can we tell?

    Further more many people (christians for example) belive that we are immortal. How can we kill that, which is immortal?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •