Reply With Quote
Those damn liberals!!
...Liberals serve up Condi-mima
CLICK ON IMAGE TO GO SEE THE BLOG.
The democrats, the party that voted to support the KKK and has a former kleagle sitting among their senatorial ranks, shows its true colors today.
And there's more...
Republican Senatorial Candidate Michael Steele is being stalked by the dems!
The Left shows how they really feel about gays today, too.
More hate from the Left.
Tammy Bruce sees another example of Leftist projection.
Those damn liberals!!
I'm wondering if Yoni is rush limbaugh. Hush it seems scours the web for a liberal viewpoint. when he finds an extreme one he then goes on to paint all libs/dems with one broad stroke.. his kool aid drinkers then follow his lead and then they post on spurstalk.. see yoni
So, it's come to this Yoni.....
Is that all you got?
According to gtownspur black votes are only used by democrats to further sexual agenda. So if the republicans expose this fallacy, the black vote is theirs.
Last edited by Cant_Be_Faded; 10-05-2006 at 06:09 PM. Reason: gculo
Yoni-rat is backed into a corner by the all his Repugs have been doing and getting hit with.
Yoni-spawn-of-Rove must go on the attack with specious mountains of rat sniffed out of who knows where, since the Repugs are defenseless and self-destroying.
He's become the funniest guy on the forum.
You don't have to call them repugs, they are showing themselves to be the chickenhawk, chicken , perverted, power crazy, overzealous peices of that they are without any help whatsoever.
But clinton got a blowjob and lied about it!!!!!
Blacks are apparently smarter than Log Cabin Republicans. They KNOW where their bread isn't buttered.
Didn't the Demos carry something like 81% of the black vote in 04? That is winning.
but in 04, black Blackwell helped game the vote in Ohio, giving the election to dubya.
That's down from a high of 95% in some previous elections...
Any group that votes in such a large bloc are just being duped.
Like Texans.
Could I ask a serious question or two:
How come Black people need a leader or claim to be their leader
and must tell them how to vote/spend their money.
How come Hispanics also need leaders or people who claim to be
their leaders and tell them how to vote/spend their money.
I ask this in all sincerity. If I was either of the above I would be
offended no end. Most of the Blacks and Hispanics I know are
very capable of thinking for themselves and do so all the time.
What a strange world we live in.
It really is no different than Republicans or Democrats listening to the pundits or the candidates themselves to help them decide. We vote the way WE want but we cannot deny that we may be influenced one way or the other by something we see or hear from a candidate. We don't go by what LULAC or the NAACP says we should or vote for but we do listen to what they have to say. Sometimes we agree and other times we don't.
I sure don't agree with everything the Democratic party puts out but they are more along the lines of what I believe a government should be and that is why I tend to vote Democrat but I don't vote a straight ticket.
^^Joe most people don't vote a straight ticket. Yeah, I know some
do, but most don't.
Another question. What is it that the Democratic party put out
that makes you think they have the answers to government. I
honestly have heard them say anything about what they want to
do. Just that they have a better idea.
Oh Nancy said today she was going to drain the swamp. she
is part of the slime in that swamp.
I feel, obviously, that the Republicans represent me as the party
to govern. They do present plans. You may not agree with them,
but I do in most cases, as I have expressed here many times.
Anyhow. Thank you for answering my question.
I agree that the Democratic Party as a whole needs to do a better job with getting their message out to the masses. I just don't agree with the Republican party wanting to grant too much power to the President and by passing laws and the consitution as they see fit. I also don't agree with their stance on civil liberties and wanting the ability to hold "enemy combatants" and such with no due process.
Now I may be wrong on some of the issues and I will do additional research but I also go by individual congressman as well.
If the Republican party is for you that is great. It's just not for me. Not right now anyways. But being part of the process is what really matters to me. Too many people and complain yet do not vote or participate in the election process. There is no perfect candidate, IMO, on either side but I try to pick the one that best represents what I believe.
Go USA!!!
Joe, I would ask that you do one thing. Look back at history and
see what other powers the President has been granted/taken during
periods of war. Just do that for me. You will be surprised at how
little Bush has taken.
Did I miss something? When did Congress officially declare war? So all those 'enemy combatants' are really POWs, thanks for clearing that up for us Xray.
I know and I don't want like "camps" to be done again and while I understand your point, I'm more concerned with the now.
"pick your group" leaders are a media creation. When the media wants feedback on an issue from a particular group, they like to run to someone that will give them good quotes. Hence Jesse Jackson used to be interviewed a lot on a myriad of issues.
Another example is evangelical Christians. Do they "follow" James Dobson or Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson anymore or less than African-Americans follow Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson? You see where I am coming from?
Blacks, Hispanics, Christians, Jews, whatever group.......are filled with intelligent independent free thinking people that don't need "leaders" to tell them how to vote. The media needs these "leaders" to give voice to certain segments within society. Doesn't make it right, it just is.
There is no feasible way that the republican party benefits the common person, much less the lower middle class black person. Any of these people that vote republican will do it because they want to feel superior and more important than those who voted democrat.
Yes Dan, you did. A resolution was passed by both houses before the
Iraq war. And yes, they are in a sense POW's, except there is no country
of origin and they don't wear uniforms. I suppose you could say they are
espionage agents and take them before a firing squad, because that was
how agents were treated in all other wars when caught with no uniform on.
Agents had no rights and were normally tried before a secret court and
had no right to see any evidence.
Do What? What a stupid comment.
Way to stay on top of the thread's theme.
Clinton did get a blow job and lied about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
