Reply With Quote
I would let malvin Sanders go
Which Spur would you let go of for Amare Stoudamire. Potentially great again, the PF/C we've wanted alongside Tim or potentially the new CWebber Stoudamire.
Tim of course not
GNob not a chance
TParker no way
Bruce hmmn this could be the PF/C we need for a repeat le run.
Elson but he just got here. And he can run. Oh well, i trade.
Butler Same as above and only 21. Hmmn what would you do?
Horry. Could you really let him go this way? I could. Sorry Bob and thanks.
Barry. non Haters. What would you do?
Finley trade done in .2 seconds
everyone else is not anywhere near enough for Phx.
Now, to do away with about 30 bandwidth consuming posts:
Comic Book Guy SpursTalk posters,
I know this:
Phx is not looking to trade him
won't match the dollar amount
You will only consider real trades, EVER.
your mind won't allow you to consider this even theoretically.
But could you just spare redundantly telling us this?
I would let malvin Sanders go
I think Amare is broken. That said, I trade anyone outside of the big three.
Health notwithstanding, anyone but Tim and Tony.
I'd trade Fabbs for him.
There's no way PHX would give up Amare to the Spurs without getting any of the big three in return.
it wouldn't be a smart move having Horry on another team, and PHX would never let Amare go.
please God let the season start before the :"KG in a Spurs Uniform" starts up again
^
Dreamers forum.
I'd move Avery Johnson and a 2nd rounder for him.
How about Jaren Jackson's 2nd neice, Vinny Del Negro's hairpiece, and a bag of pork rinds?
Sorry Fabbs, but this is a lame thread. It is completely obvious to anyone that we would give non-Big Three players for Amare, so what's the point of asking the question?
Lame, and inaccurate response.
King would trade GNob.
spurs=bling would not trade Horry.
Sure spurs=bling wouldn't trade Horry.
That's BS. In a real situation, with Amare on the table for 36yo Horry, NO-ONE IN THE KNOWN UNIVERSE WOULDN'T MAKE THAT TRADE, and I don't care that they say in your lame thread that they wouldn't.
Why didn't you ask a far better and more informative question like: "which of the big 3 would you trade for Amare?" That might have actually generated some interesting responses.
Lame.
spurs=bling are you from the known universe?
Puffy or Ruffy,
plus my thread was wide open for which of the big three you could trade.
Ignoramus.
Last edited by Fabbs; 10-20-2006 at 12:24 AM.
None of the 3. Too many unknowns with Amare to give up players in their primes.
duncan for amare, right now. imagine parker lobbing to that kid. manu slashing by duncan (like in FIBA). spurs go 21st century style nba basketball. small ball is all of a sudden not so stupid
maybe or maybe not.
and i wouldn't trade anybody on the team they are fine the way they are.
you guys are ing delusional. if Amare is back in shape (im not saying he will be, but if) anyone with a ing brain would trade Ginobili or Parker for him. they are not untouchable yet. the only untouchable player on the Spurs is Tim Duncan, because he IS the Spurs. without him, they suck. thats why i have such incredible respect for Duncan. he probably does more with less better than any player in the league. he is a pure winner. no one in the league carries their team more than Duncan carries the Spurs.
Amare's got alot to prove, and a ways to recoup. Duncan is Duncan, but the Spurs need Parker and Ginobili, especially with the condition of their bench.
A frontcourt with Duncan and a healthy Amare would be siiiiiiiick.
With the Amare of the 2005 playoffs and Duncan, yes.
Like I said, healthy.
Don't call me ignoramous, fvckwad.
I made no ad hominem attacks on you, I even apologised when I called your thread lame (which it is - shall we have a poll?), and now you attack me for what is at heart a reasonable objection? Screw you pal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
