Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Let's face it...regardless of what party loyalists think...

    Giulianni, McCain, Clark...are about as much straight party candidates as NBADan is sane.


    I am just wondering if the time is right for a candidate to attempt this since all the best candidates from the two parties don't truly fit the party platform.

    I an not real huge on McCain but he's definitely not a straight conservative.

    Giulianni is only a conservative when it comes to crime(and I am expecting foreign policy as well)...

    Clark is only a liberal on domestic policy(if even that)...

    These guys are not traditional strict party candidates but they do all happen to be IMO, the leading candidates in 08.

    To those of you that are leaning towards voting for any of these guys...

    Would you vote for them if they ran as an Independent?


    It might be the best thing for the country seeing as how running as an Independen would allow them to dump the stupider stances of the two parties and keep the better aspects of them...

  2. #2
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    If the choice is one of those guys you mentioned and the hacks both parties are bound to nominate, sure.

  3. #3
    Luck the Fakers Bob Lanier's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,425
    Short answer: No, of course they couldn't win.

  4. #4
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    I don't see any excitement being generated over Clark or McCain. Rudy? I don't know.

  5. #5
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    If he could live down the UN speech, Colin Powell would be the guy.

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    I don't see any excitement being generated over Clark or McCain. Rudy? I don't know.

    Clark IMO is the best candidate...he's just not a politician...

    If he gets out there, gets Michael Moore off his nuts, and is active he emerges as the leading candidate...even though he might not be the most favored Democrat.

  7. #7
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    I'd say that Clark is currently the most electable Democrat, I'm not sure he could take many votes away from either party in a general elaction as an independent. Not enough name recognition as opposed to Powell or Giulianni

  8. #8
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Collin Powell would easil win even after the UN speech. That speech is widely considered something he was used for, not that he supported.

    Of course Powell would never run, so thats moot.

    Also, the only way a true indepedent will win is if they are independently wealthy ie Ross Perot because there is no way any other means will generate enough money to compete with the 2 party machine.

  9. #9
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    Forget McCain. He's a fair weather friend and bends easily under pressure. He would be a disaster.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Nuggets
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    12,134
    Forget McCain. He's a fair weather friend and bends easily under pressure. He would be a disaster.

    So was Kerry and he almost won in 2004.

  11. #11
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    Kerry didn't almost win because he was liked...he almost won because W is just about the most unlikeable politician in history....

    W won because Kerry is the most unlikeable candidate in history. Ted Kennedy, Michael Dukakis, and Pat Robertson excluded...

  12. #12
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Nuggets
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    12,134
    Kerry didn't almost win because he was liked...he almost won because W is just about the most unlikeable politician in history....

    W won because Kerry is the most unlikeable candidate in history. Ted Kennedy, Michael Dukakis, and Pat Robertson excluded...

    I meant Kerry almost won even being "fair weather".

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    My bad...good point.

  14. #14
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    Lieberman is the shining example right now.

    Couldn't win the primary; but won the general election.

    The country would vote moderate; but the parties won't nominate one for President - Lieberman had the name, the history, and most importantly, the $$$$ to win at the state level; CAN'T happen at the national, unless a billionaire just takes it upon himself to run (ala Perot - who could of possibly done something if he hadn't gone all "black helicopter" crazy)

    A serious, funded, independent candidate would get emasculated by the dems and republicans; just too much of a risk to let that camel get its nose in the door.

  15. #15
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    An independant will never win the Presidency. Ever.

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564

    A serious, funded, independent candidate would get emasculated by the dems and republicans; .

    You mean like the Republicans tried to do to Clinton? And the Democrats tried to do to Reagan? And W for that matter.

    I think it could definitely happen...even without major financing if the candidates name was well known.

  17. #17
    Luck the Fakers Bob Lanier's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,425
    No, that's pretty much the opposite of what he means.

  18. #18
    I can live with it JoeChalupa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    21,547
    McCain - Lieberman....yeah, that's the ticket.

  19. #19
    Retired Ray xrayzebra's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    9,096
    Folks, Hillary in 08. That is my early prediction. The stage is set. The
    characters are all in place. There is no one who has the capability to
    energize the country. Where-o-where are the leaders. I see none.
    Liberman, maybe. Let's see if he holds up as an independent or as an old
    fashion Democrat. Either one I could live with.

  20. #20
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    Hillary... I could live with.


  21. #21
    Retired Ray xrayzebra's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    9,096
    No I meant Libermann as an Independent or old fashion Democrat....
    But you got me on my sentence structure....


    But I may have to live with Hillary, like it or not......

  22. #22
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    There has only been one independent candidate in my lifetime who has even gotten electoral votes: George Wallace in 1968, running on the "I hate ######s" platform. He took a handful of states in the deep south, Al, Ms, Ar, Ga, La.

  23. #23
    Fantasy Football Guru Guru of Nothing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    7,583
    Let's see if he holds up as an independent or as an old
    fashion Democrat.
    The ONE time you eschew dimmocrap, you frame it within the context of "old-fashioned Democrat." . .. you even capitalized "Democrat."

    Is you is, or is you is not a Republican? ...


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •