Reply With Quote
Are you saying his middle name is Hussein? If so, "Jeb in 08". Long live hick rule.
Since he currently seems otherwise bulletproof, the only thing Republican talking heads can do is utter Obama's moniker with repeated, comically exaggerated emphasis on his middle name.
I guess they hope voters are as ignorant as they think they are.
Are you saying his middle name is Hussein? If so, "Jeb in 08". Long live hick rule.
If you go by them, it's HOOOOOOOOSAAAAAYNE.Are you saying his middle name is Hussein?
Obama.........Osama............coincidence?....... ........I think not.
Wut's heees name?
BLACK HOOOSSAANE OSSAMMA????
Wut da dem yankees go n put hm in gubmnt fer?
yep, the Repug slime/swift-boat/racist-pandering machine will murder Obama, starting with his race and his "terrorist" name. They'll slime his miscegenating ancestors, too.
America The Beautiful, the Shining City on the Hill, will be never more Beauitful and Shiny than when Rove, Repugs, etc go after Obama, Hillary, etc.
I listen to a lot of political radio (left and right) throughout the day, and I've yet to hear anyone seriously try to use his name as a negative. Sounds like a joke that you're taking too seriously.
Do you have a link/examples to all these "talking heads" who are "comically exagerrating" his name, or do you just expect us to settle for "them"?
I've seen it on MSNBC twice in the past week. Tucker and Hardball.
i say it all the time.
Wow - so you're the audience! No one else watches those shows - that's why no one else has heard "HOOOOOOOSSSAAAAAYNE"!
Ah, plenty watch those shows. Tucker is a , but he's a real conservative unlike posers like you. You'll be hearing alot more of it in the future. Bank on it.
SHUSTER: Ed, Barack Obama‘s going up to New Hampshire. He‘s somebody I mentioned Republicans should be careful of. He‘s a great speaker...
ROGERS: Please, help me, David. Somebody that underestimates Barack Hussein Obama. Please. I mean, this man is a blank canvas where people project their desires and their ideal candidate because nobody knows anything about him. And he has a deep voice...
TRIPPI: Have you ever heard him speak?
(CROSSTALK)
ROGERS: He has a deep voice, he gives a good presentation. Put me down as somebody that counts him out.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15951792/
Sorry, couldn't find a video. Ed Rogers is a Republican strategist.
You could have left Hillary out of that equation. She has given as much as she has taken over the years.
As a white, college educated, faith based republican, I am dissapointed that the real issues regarding the validity of a candidate will not be the "real issues" when it comes to Barak Obama. But then, politics across the board long ago went the way of convincing the general public that your opponent is worse for America that you are.
FWIW, I am quite confident that the Dems as well will have some political strategy that "goes after" whatever Repub will be running. But then we all knew that, didn't we?
Actually, it'll be interesting to see if Hillary or other Democrats try that kind of in the primaries.You could have left Hillary out of that equation. She has given as much as she has taken over the years.
When you say "faith based republican", do you also approve of church and state as one?
Why do I have the feeling that this is an agenda based question designed as a springboard into some missive about separation of church and state?
Let me make it real simple. I am a person of faith, specifically Christianity. As a person of faith, I hold to ideals that are socially and morally conservative. In holding these conservative ideals, I have elected to adhere to the political party that best (note: not completely, but best) represents by personal belief system. Thus, a faith based republican. If the ideology of another political party were to better represent what I believe, I would not be a republican.
Try not to read your assumptions into it.
"socially and morally conservative" voting the for party that privately ridiculed you faith-based holy rollers and suckered you into believing that they would legislate, "activist-ically", your specific cult's morality into federal laws.
Because I adhere to a religion I am therefore a holy roller, cultic and attempting to legislate morality? Does this apply to anyone who adheres to any religion, or have I become the target of your agression for something other than arbitrarily pushing one of your liberal buttons?
Not every person who self-identifies as a Christian and a Republican is in nefarious cahoots with Pat Robertson to legislate their personal value system on everyone else.
You voted for Bush.Because I adhere to a religion I am therefore a holy roller, cultic and attempting to legislate morality? Does this apply to anyone who adheres to any religion, or have I become the target of your agression for something other than arbitrarily pushing one of your liberal buttons?
That's enough for him.
I wouldn't have if there would have been better alternatives. But he doesn't want to know that.
Sounds like a better alternative would have to be permently joined with religion.
Not sure that I fully understand this comment.
I was stating that if another party would have placed a better candidate on the ballot, I would have probably voted for that other candidate.
Your personal belief system is closely connected to religious faith, therefore you chose republican based on that ideology.
Do you really think Bush gives a about God?
I don't doubt Bush's personal faith, but it's easy to see he or his people didn't think much about carrying out the social conservatives' agenda beyond scraps like faith-based initiatives and a few pamphlets about abstinance.
I have doubts about his faith. He uses it as exploitation.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
