Reply With Quote
Better days.
...on December 6, 1997.
CNN
Kind of takes you back, don't it?
Better days.
Yeah, I wonder what Osama bin Laden and Mohammed Atta were up to that day.
Why do you care?
Anxiously awaiting bush's election.
Because, apparently, no one in the government was ing worried about what they were doing that day.
Too goddamned busy getting their knob polished.
Do you care about Osama bin Laden now?
The last gasp of the dying neocon.
Clinton....got a blow job....in....the....*ack*
It's a little late for that. He's pretty impotent and, probably, greasing the space between two boulder in a Tora Bora mountainside.
The time to have cared about him was when he was actually killing Americans.
Yoni doesn't care about Osama Bin Laden.
How many cruise missles did Bush lauch into Afganistan to target bin Laden prior to 9/11?
I want him brought to justice, which has probably already occurred. But, I'm not concerned that he's capable of executing any diabolical plans...no.
Hahaha, this thread has got to be a joke.
The previous administration had established the policy regarding Osama bin Laden. President Bush barely had time to transition before 9/11 and there was no pretense between taking office and September 11 that would have allowed President Bush to launch those missiles. It's not even clear that Osama bin Laden whereabouts were known during that period.
It's not like Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda were the only threats we faced on January 21, 2001.
You're an idiot PeePee.
Well, it started out that way.
I see. So "damn Clinton" for not catching/killing OBM, but Bush gets a pass for not setting having his foreign policy set 8 MONTHS after taking office. They certainly didn't waste time setting plans to invade Iraq before 9/11.
You do realize Iraq was invaded in March of 2003, a full 18 months after 9/11 and after an invasion of Afghanistan [a result of which caused thousands of terrorists, Zarqawi amond them, to flee to -- yep, you guessed it, Iraq].
I wouldn't have been disappointed if, on January 22, 2001, the President had launched a cruise missile attack in Afghanistan. But, that's because we now know the future. Do you honestly believe the Left wouldn't have started their bellyaching immediately instead of waiting until September 12th (after the customary 24 hours of unity)?
But, that's because we now know the future.
You do realize I was referring to their plan/desire/intention to invade Iraq prior to 9/11?
Nobody "on the left" bellyached about going after OBM before or after 9/11.
From that point, you imbecile. Can you ever stay on topic or, do you just devolve to nonsense when you can't think of anything else to say?
It was your topic, dip .Can you ever stay on topic
Don't get mad because you owned yourself again.
It might -- no, it apparently -- would surprise you to learn we have plans to invade, attack, or neutralize a whole host of countries/regimes that are hostile to the U.S.
Your characterization of desire and intention are pure conjecture that doesn't seriously advance any discussion. But, considering we were still in a state of war with Iraq after only a cease-fire agreement in 1991 kept us from annihilating the regime then, intention is probably a reasonable argument.
It's pretty apparent, after 12 years of continued violence, obstruction, and bold claims, we'd be stupid not to be prepared to clean Saddam's clock. Which, by the way, was accomplished in 21 days...largely due to the planning that went into the invasion beforehand.
No, you were too busy bellyaching about Clinton's raw deal and about how stupid/evil the Bush Cabal was for stealing the election. Y'all had completely forgotten about bin Laden.
I suppose. Kind of like when the mentally re ed laugh when they don't understand something.
It surprised me that we didn't have one for the Taliban regime.It might -- no, it apparently -- would surprise you to learn we have plans to invade, attack, or neutralize a whole host of countries/regimes that are hostile to the U.S.And because we already controlled the air and Saddam had no control over a good portion of his country anyway, and where he did have control, he had a severely weakened army that could no longer fix its equipment.It's pretty apparent, after 12 years of continued violence, obstruction, and bold claims, we'd be stupid not to be prepared to clean Saddam's clock. Which, by the way, was accomplished in 21 days...largely due to the planning that went into the invasion beforehand.And you were shouting from the rooftops about him, right?No, you were too busy bellyaching about Clinton's raw deal and about how stupid/evil the Bush Cabal was for stealing the election. Y'all had completely forgotten about bin Laden.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
