Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    ...for all (including insurgents) to see.
    New Counterinsurgency Manual Hits Net
    Why is the DoD Making it Available to Insurgents,Terrorists?
    By EASON JORDAN Posted 3 hr. 43 min. ago

    Your IraqSlogger editors are stunned that the Pentagon has released to the entire world and posted on the Web the U.S. military’s new 282-page counterinsurgency war-fighting manual.

    This is the first post-9/11 “war on terror” U.S. military counterinsurgency manual – the long-awaited doctrine meant to turn the tide for U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The counterinsurgency field manual's cover reads in part, "Distribution Restriction: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited."

    Why?

    Now you and everyone, including Al Qaeda terrorists and insurgents, can read the entire 282-page manual.

    It's posted on multiple military Web sites.

    While the manual doesn’t contain classified secrets, it contains an astounding amount of seemingly sensitive military doctrine, with subject headings including:

    -- INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE OPERATIONS

    -- HUMAN INTELLIGENCE AND OPERATIONAL REPORTING

    -- COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERRECONNAISSANCE

    -- INTELLIGENCE COLLABORATION

    -- INTELLIGENCE CELLS AND WORKING GROUPS

    -- PROTECTING SOURCES

    -- EXECUTING COUNTERINSURGENCY OPERATIONS

    -- TARGETING

    Should such sensitive and detailed information be dished up to the U.S.’s enemies, especially via Pentagon Web sites?

    In the manual's foreword, Lt. Generals David Petreaus and James Amos write in part, "With our Soldiers and Marines fighting insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is essential that we give them a manual that provides principles and guidelines for counterinsurgency operations."

    How would a U.S. soldier or Marine now in Iraq or Afghanistan feel knowing the hot-off-the-presses counterinsurgency manual is available to the “bad guys” at the same time it is available to the “good guys”?

    Granted, the Pentagon posts a lot on the Web, but it seems fair to ask whether this entire 282-page do ent (surely, there are additional classified components) should be made available to all.

    Will the manual be of value to Al Qaeda terrorists, Iraqi insurgents, and the Taliban?

    Would the U.S. think it had scored an intelligence coup if it got its hands on the insurgents' 282-page field manual?


    How would the American people feel if asked in a poll whether the U.S. military's counterinsurgency manual should be shared with the insurgents?

    One can imagine that if the entire manual had been leaked to and was published by a newspaper rather than by the Pentagon itself, U.S. officials would condemn the media for putting U.S. military forces at risk and multiple investigations would be underway to nail the leaker.

    Your IraqSlogger team will keep an eye out on terrorist and insurgent Web sites to see whether they provide links to Pentagon Web sites providing the counterinsurgency manual -- or whether they go so far as to translate the manual into Arabic and other languages.

    Stay tuned.
    Not a partisan issue, not an ideological issue, just a "what the happened to common sense!" issue.


  2. #2
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    Update...
    Jihadists Read, Mock New U.S. Army Guide
    U.S.'s Enemies Dissect 282-Page Counterinsurgency Manual
    By EASON JORDAN 12/18/2006 00:22 AM ET
    Jihadists and their supporters are reading and mocking the Pentagon's new counterinsurgency field manual, which was released publicly and posted on several Department of Defense Web sites Friday even though it addresses such sensitive topics as intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and targeting.

    One Arabic-language jihadist Web site linking to the Pentagon's 282-page counterinsurgency manual is Tajdeed.net, which routinely calls for the killing of U.S. and British forces in Iraq; praises bin Laden, al Qaeda, and the 9/11 attacks; and whose sponsor, Mohamed al Massari, has called for the assassination of George Bush and Tony Blair.

    Al Massari, an expatriate Saudi dissident, and his jihadist Web site are based in Britain, where he lives despite calls by some British leaders for Al Massari's deportation or arrest.

    On the same Tajdeed Web page providing a link to the Pentagon's new counterinsurgency manual (linked from a related Reuters story posted on the site), there is a gruesome photo of the body of a U.S. Air Force pilot whose parachute is still strapped to his back (apparently Major Troy Gilbert, whose plane went down north of Baghdad in late November).

    Next to that photo is a computer-generated smiley face with these words in Arabic: "This one won't be reading the manual."

    The Arabic-language Tajdeed message board posting is headed: "The American occupation publishes a booklet containing directives to its soldiers on facing the mujahadeen."

    Notable Arabic-language comments from readers of the Tajdeed posting include "Bless you, you who have broken the U.S. and its military and made it resort to booklets." Also: "The Pentagon is distributing the booklet to save whatever is left of it!," referring to the U.S. military.

    As of 0015et (0815 Iraq time) Monday, 363 people had read the Arabic-language message board containing the link to the manual and the photo of the dead U.S. airman.

    The Tajdeed Web site also showcases gory videos of attacks against western targets in Iraq, provides de facto insurgent training manuals, and provides tips for jihadis on how to sneak into Iraq.

    Initial reaction to the Pentagon's global, unrestricted distribution of the counterinsurgency field manual was one of disbelief.

    One British private security contractor with employees in Iraq said: "Only in the land of the free could (such) a handbook be produced and issued to the enemy." The contractor spoke on the condition of anonymity because his company works with the U.S. military.

    The 282-page counterinsurgency manual is the first comprehensive U.S. military guide on the topic in two decades. U.S. military commanders say the do ent isn't specific to any particular conflict, although two U.S. generals wrote in the manual's foreword that it should be especially useful to U.S. fighting forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    While the entire manual was released to the world without restriction, an earlier, smaller preliminary U.S. military counterinsurgency guide distributed in 2004 was classified as restricted to distribution to DoD personnel and military contractors.

  3. #3
    JEBO TE! Clandestino's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    5,649
    the classification on the previous book wasn't really a classification anyway. DOD personnel and military contractors...there are thousands of them... and they could just as easily release it.. obviously the book has no secrets. also, if they had not released it to the public, nbadan and his tin hatters would have been ing it shoud have been released.

    either way, most of you guys have never seen a field manual and don't even know what a field manual is...

  4. #4
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    NOW PeePee gets concerned about the disclosure of national secrets. Where were you during the NSA/NYTimes debates over surveillance techniques and the SWIFT program?

  5. #5
    Veteran 01Snake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,540
    NOW PeePee gets concerned about the disclosure of national secrets. Where were you during the NSA/NYTimes debates over surveillance techniques and the SWIFT program?

  6. #6
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    "but, but........ neocon blogs cut and paste.....wahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! wahhhh!!"

    - Typical pseudo independent liberal poster

  7. #7
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    NOW PeePee gets concerned about the disclosure of national secrets. Where were you during the NSA/NYTimes debates over surveillance techniques and the SWIFT program?
    A field manual on counterinsurgency isn't an assault on privacy. It is more useful to terrorists in developing counter strategies than the NYT confirming what they already knew - we're bugging their phones.

  8. #8
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    Where were you during the NSA/NYTimes debates over surveillance techniques and the SWIFT program?
    The same place you were when the Republicans put nookyoolar blueprints on the web.

  9. #9
    Veteran 01Snake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,540
    an assault on privacy.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •