Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    "what the...OH !

    Run Tony, Run!

    You can make it!

    You're gonna make it!

    AAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW !"

    Classic. in CLASSIC!

    Here ya go Cowboys fans.


  2. #2
    Go DJ T-Pain's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    3,985
    yeah i need one of those

  3. #3
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    I'm not sad, just pissed.


    P.S. Giants are going to beat the Eagles tomorrow

  4. #4
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    I don't. The Cowboys were better this year than last year. Losing always sucks but losing in the playoffs is better than not making the playoffs at all.

  5. #5


    P.S. Giants are going to beat the Eagles tomorrow
    You're smoking dope if you believe that.

  6. #6
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    P.S. Giants are going to beat the Eagles tomorrow
    Yeah...beat them to the golf course.

  7. #7
    No More Pink NorCal510's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,332
    giants will beat the eagles

  8. #8
    stick and move dallaskd's Avatar
    Post Count
    9,495
    im mad, but next year is the year for sure.

  9. #9
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    You're smoking dope if you believe that.
    I have never smoked a thing in my life. So no.

  10. #10
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    I hope the Eagle win, because I'd rather play at Chicago than at New Orleans. The Bears are vulnerable.

  11. #11

  12. #12

  13. #13
    I have never smoked a thing in my life. So no.
    So will you start smoking cigarettes, weed, crack or pole?

  14. #14
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    giants will beat the eagles
    Oops.

  15. #15
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    If Giants DEF didn't suck so bad, my statement would be true.

  16. #16
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    So will you start smoking cigarettes, weed, crack or pole?
    No, only losers do drugs.

  17. #17
    No, only losers do drugs.
    So it's pole?

  18. #18
    The Crominator J.T.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    15,142
    No, only losers do drugs.
    Get over yourself and smoke a bowl.

  19. #19
    Fantasy Football Guru Guru of Nothing's Avatar
    Post Count
    7,583


    Bart "Romo" Simpson

  20. #20
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    If Giants DEF didn't suck so bad, my statement would be true.
    Their defense sucked before you made that statement.

  21. #21
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    10,363
    I don't know if anyone has discussed this aspect of the problem.

    Why would Jerry Jones not hire a player who's only role were to hold snaps? 50K salary, perhaps? I mean, why risk an injury to your starting quarterback simply because you didn't hire a holder? As soon as Romo was promoted to the starting quarterback position his role as holder should have been relinquished immediately...

  22. #22
    Masochist Rangers Fan Melmart1's Avatar
    Post Count
    12,623
    You can't hire a guy to hold snaps if your roster is already full.

  23. #23
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Broncos
    Post Count
    12,134
    I don't know if anyone has discussed this aspect of the problem.

    Why would Jerry Jones not hire a player who's only role were to hold snaps? 50K salary, perhaps? I mean, why risk an injury to your starting quarterback simply because you didn't hire a holder? As soon as Romo was promoted to the starting quarterback position his role as holder should have been relinquished immediately...

    First of all, you can't pay a player 50K, there is a league minimum and it's around 300k right now, I think more in fact. Furthermore, kickers are a funny bunch, they only prefer certain holders once they get comfortable with them. Look at Detmer in Philly, their kicker was only comfortable with him, so much so that they brought him back. Romo is probably the best holder on that team and not to mention, the kicker was probably comfortable with him holding. Plus the fact that he had done it a 100 times this season and you never saw him screw it up once. It's just one of those things that happens from time to time.

  24. #24
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    10,363
    First of all, you can't pay a player 50K, there is a league minimum and it's around 300k right now, I think more in fact. Furthermore, kickers are a funny bunch, they only prefer certain holders once they get comfortable with them. Look at Detmer in Philly, their kicker was only comfortable with him, so much so that they brought him back. Romo is probably the best holder on that team and not to mention, the kicker was probably comfortable with him holding. Plus the fact that he had done it a 100 times this season and you never saw him screw it up once. It's just one of those things that happens from time to time.

    But still... this does not eliminate the fact that the team is risking an injury to its star(ting) quarterback because he also happens to be a holder.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Broncos
    Post Count
    12,134
    But still... this does not eliminate the fact that the team is risking an injury to its star(ting) quarterback because he also happens to be a holder.

    I see what you're saying, but I would bet that not many injuries have occurred from being the holder on place kicks. I don't know that for sure, I'm just assuming as I've never seen it happen in the 20 years that I've been watching pro football.

    But you're right, it could happen. It was still a freak thing though that 99 times out of 100 it wouldn't have been a problem. Romo just picked the worst possible time of his career to make it a problem.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •