Reply With Quote
These "Christians" think The Jetsons cartoon series was a do entary
(thanks to Lewis Black).
club? political? troll? i don't know..... but
LINK
The Bible does not list the names of every creature on the Ark. It does say that one set of every kind of air-breathing animal was on board (Genesis 6:19-20, 7:15-16). So, dinosaurs must have been included.
There is evidence that dinosaurs lived after the Flood. For instance, Job saw "behemoth" after the Flood. (Other evidences will be discussed later.)
The Ark was a very large ship designed especially by God for its important purpose. It was so large and complex that it took Noah 120 years to build. Noah used this time to warn people about the Flood and convince them to turn to God and be saved with his family.
These "Christians" think The Jetsons cartoon series was a do entary
(thanks to Lewis Black).
These "Christians" think The Jetsons cartoon series was a do entary
(thanks to Lewis Black).
No one likes you.
Boutons hates cartoons.These "Christians" think The Jetsons cartoon series was a do entary
(thanks to Lewis Black).
Most people don't even realize that the biological classification of 'kind' does not equate to the modern taxidermical classification of 'species'...
Mosts theological historians believe that the biblical classification is most similar to to the modern classification of 'family' or 'genus'. Meaning that only a pair of wolves would be required to represent/salvage most of the Canine world (wolves, dogs, foxes, dingoes, coyotes, jackals etc...).
As for dinosaurs being on the ark... the uncertainty of 'dinosaur' species still alive at the time would render the concept debateable.
Last edited by Phenomanul; 01-09-2007 at 02:26 PM.
......
I can just hear Mrs. Moses....
Honey...Tyrannosaurus Rex just broke out of his stall again & ate another donkey...I told you bipedal carnivore’s on the Ark was a bad idea....But nooooo...."Mister Holier than Thou" had do carry out orders word for word.....
"Meaning that only a pair of <large animals>"
... a single breeding pair is sufficient to parent and salvage a species? The unavoidable inbreeding of their children wouldn't be species-condemning, be a too-limited gene pool?
Is there any evidence (as opposed to "theological historians believe") or experiments that show a single breeding pair is sufficient:
a) for survival of the <animal (mammal)> species?and
b) provoke the basis for widely diverse speciation (dogs, foxes, dingoes, coyotes, jackals etc...)?
All in the less-than-10,000 years since Noah's flood?
I thought "Christians" were dead-set against speciation since it would confirm Satanic evolution? Did not God create all species a little while ago, (was it on Tuesday or Wednesday?) just as they exist today?
If I don't believe in Noah, his Ark,and the Great Flood, can I still a Christian and not go to ?
I highly respect your graceful admission, your mature, reflective open-mindedness that dinosaurs sailing around with Noah on his wooden super-tanker would be "debatable".
"1 Million Years B.C" was on cable TV this morning. It showed Racquel Welch and dinosaurs running around together. Is this movie shown in "Christian" schools? Was this a "Christian" financed propaganda project, or was it just a bunch of "Hollywoods Jews" trying make a buck in the furry loincloth/bra+dinosaur genre?
Am I just starting ? Maybe, maybe not.
I'd hit it.
Canines are all interfertile... that should be sufficient proof. Proof of what exactly??.... that our genomes are highly complicated and contain vast genetic wealth beyond what we typically observe and beyond the simple linear, genetic code we see on the outside. Case in point would be to consider that the so called 'dead zones' in DNA actually contribute to the bookmarking of active genes. If they were any longer or any shorter by one base pair the active gene stored in the codon segment would be misread and rendered useless. Another detail widely missed and underrated is the fact that several gene segments code for multiple proteins all determined by how another gene segment is instructed to decode them. That means that there are literally 100's of billions of gene combinations in every genome and that we've only scratched the surface of this transcribing phenomenon. As an example, if gene segment A is known to produce protein/enzyme A that doesn't mean that segment A only codes for said protein. If spurred about by certain biological pathways (as carried and dictated by other gene segments), gene segment A may also code for proteins B through Z, and this doesn't include the effect of gene recombinations. In laymen's terms; our genetic wealth is greater and far more complicated than conveyed by its simple linear code. Genomes contain phenotypic traits that may never be or are rarely manifested by a species' genotype. Or a laymen example would be to consider that this very paragraph can be reconstructed into hundreds of different sentences simply by scrambling the letters therein - each to be deciphered by different filters.
Why not? How many dog 'species' have been created in the past millenium... how 'bout the last 100 years?
Unguided speciation as the proof of evolution... and guided adaptation are two different concepts.
But no, I'm not responsible for you misinterpreting a whole slew of positions on the matter - particularly my own.
Can you be a Christian if you've rejected the evangelistic message of Jesus? Now that would be the more pressing and significant question to be asking.
"History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon." - Napoleon BonaparteI highly respect your graceful admission, your mature, reflective open-mindedness that dinosaurs sailing around with Noah on his wooden super-tanker would be "debateable".
i.e. All history is debateable.
You are en led to think what you want... as long as you don't go around presuming to know exactly why it is I believe what I do..... that is unless I've already stated my position."1 Million Years B.C" was on cable TV this morning. It showed Racquel Welch and dinosaurs running around together. Is this movie shown in "Christian" schools? Was this a "Christian" financed propaganda project, or was it just a bunch of "Hollywoods Jews" trying make a buck in the furry loincloth/bra+dinosaur genre?
Am I just starting ? Maybe, maybe not.
Last edited by Phenomanul; 01-09-2007 at 02:25 PM.
jesus does...its kinda funny how people hate christians because they think christians judge to much, when they judge just the same if not more..every one has sinned there for every one is going to enless you take jesus as your lord and savior..for we all fall short of the glory of God..only way to get in the gates of heaven is accepting Him.theres many proofs of that in the bible,for instance john 3:16 states For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
"No one likes you."
This from the "Christian" who said he/she/it wants to fight me over forum postings, and wants my mother dead.
"All history is debateble"
Who's talking "soft" history.
Isn't the subject "hard" science that 10s of 1000s of scientists over 100+ years have agreed to call "hard" (until hard evidence proves otherwise)?
No one likes you.
How did the kangaroos get back to Australia?
They swam.......duh.
Well even that is debateable isn't it?
"Well even that is debateable isn't it?"
Show me your hard, scientific evidence for Genesis' cosmology.
Here we go....
What? You don't know?
They filled their pouches with hot air and floated over to the continent.
Some of the heavier ones drifted there by sea.
There were only two though.
How did the air stay hot?
The flood was not on the whole earth
Kangaroos are naturally an aquatic species. It was only after the fall of marsupials (circa 1670) that they lost the ability to swim - although some of the more spiritually attuned of them can still roo-paddle. But Satan gave them multiple vaginas and pronged penises in exchange for being limited to land, so it's not like it turned out all bad.
Dinosaurs are fake.
if dinosaurs are fake, wtf are those things in the ground?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
