I'm nto sure how he would've fit into our system (I;m not a scout, coach, or BBall expert) but I <3 boykins and his play.
damn it.
Not sure if anyone saw him as a potential answer at backup point, but if you did...sorry.
I'm nto sure how he would've fit into our system (I;m not a scout, coach, or BBall expert) but I <3 boykins and his play.
damn it.
Interesting.
I think Denver loses out but obviously they did it for $$ reasons as stated.
What kind of wishlist included Boykins?
Anyway, he's a casualty of the Nuggets wasting so much money on KMart and Nene.
FOR STEVE BLAKE? You have got to be kidding me, we could have sent them Erik Williams for Earl. Not that I would really want a 5 foot 5 point who cant pass, but Steve Blake?
Interesting. Steve Blake has been horrible this season, so I'm not sure the Nuggets will get anything out of him. He might be decent to pair in the backcourt with AI since he's 6-foot-3.
Nuggets fans hated Boykins and Julius Hodge was pretty much a bust. I don't really see where Boykins is going to fit in with the Bucks. They have Mo Williams backed up by Charlie Bell. As long as Redd is out, they can put Bell at SG and have Boykins back up both. But when Redd comes back, that will be a little crowded.
All in all, pretty decent trade for both sides. Nuggets get rid of some salary and get a guy who can pass and the Bucks get even more scoring without having to give up much.
I think A.I.'s tutoring Boykins now. He's really improved on his shot and penetration.
Back when Boykins used to actually pass the ball and he could be had for cheap, I wanted the Spurs to sign him. But these days, Boykins doesn't pass and doesn't even try to play defense.
Plus, he's literally the worst rebounder in the league. And the Spurs don't need any help in that category.
Mo Williams is going to be out for like four weeks as far as I understand. Boykins will probably start at PG for the Bucks. He shoots way too much.
Good catch. Overall, it was a nicely done panic trade by the Bucks.
Mo Williams and Charlie Bell are both free agents this summer, AFAIK. Getting Boykins for one more year, and not very expensively, is good insurance for likely losing one of these two guys. Mo Williams in particular was having a dynamite year. Still will, once he returns from injury.
Boykins can opt-out of his contract too, I believe. If Beno doesn't turn it around, Bell would be a pretty nice investment this summer.
How bad is it that I would rather not have guys on our team that even Sequ is taller than?![]()
Charlie Bell often came to my mind when thinking about a better back-up PG than Beno is. he is much of what Spurs would ask for IMO. not a great playmaker, but quite athletic and a good defender, who doesn't turn the ball over much. for minimum money he is a steal.
they did the trade cose they know boykins wouldve bolted in FA.
imo boykins on the spurs = no defense bench.....
He's listed on ESPN.com as a Small Forward. Is that just a gross mis-type or is this guy really utilized at that position?
aRe the Nuggets serious? Trade Boykins and Hodge for that Blake.
Not a good trade.
I forget which article, but there was one recently that stated the Nuggets would be looking for a big PG to compliment AI...guess they got him.
I know that Pop likes "small ball" but Boykins?!
Pop's wildest dreams could come true with true small ball if he got boykins.
boykins
parker
ginobili
bowen
Duncan![]()
Good deal for both teams :
Blake is a better fit with scorers like AI, Melo and Smith. Nuggets save $8M with this trade by going under the luxury tax. Only 4 teams are over the luxury tax threshold : Knicks, Mavs, Wolves and Spurs. Spurs and Wolves are very close to the threshold and will likely do a move to go under : the luxury tax system works well and is almost a hard salary cap.
Bucks upgrades their backcourt for almost nothing. I hope they will suck and miss the playoffs this year because Spurs have their second round pick : a pick between 35th and 40th can be quite usefull.
Nuggets are really taking it on the chin to get under the tax threshold. They kinda went from three point guards last season to none now. They have a couple of open roster spots now, I think they'll be one of the teams in the Randy Livingston "sweepstakes" with the other teams needing veteren help at the point for a playoff run.
Bucks will drop in standings with Redd and Mo Williams out for some time in addition to Villanueva. The pick is around #47 right now and figures to drop.
They're not taking anything on the chin. They're about to have the top two scorers in the NBA on the same team and you'd add a pure chucker like Earl Boykins to the mix? It's addition by subtration on that level - they pure didn't need him. Saving money was the prime consideration, but basketball-wise, they just don't need Boykins at all.
And last I checked, Allen Iverson is a point guard.
Taking it on the chin = getting less than market value for a player. In pure basketball terms, you don't let Boykins go for Steve Blake, even if it just means playing Boykins those 10 minutes that Iverson sits.
Really, who would you rather have playing when Iverson is on the bench? Blake or Boykins?
It's an understandable tax move, but for this season that's about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)