Reply With Quote
Again..it is DEMOCRAT.
Get it right man!!!!!
...to secure a majority:
10. Appoint Terry McAullife Party chairman for life. If McAuliffe isn't available, this guy would be great.
9. Close the telepathic subliminal electioneering gap.
8. Nominate more Massachusetts liberals. C'mon, give Teddy "Splash" Kennedy another shot. After all, he hasn't drowned anyone this century.
7. Start a nationwide Guardian letter writing campaign.
6. Can Bob Shrum run a campaign or what? Don't change a thing.
5. Don't just legalize gay marriage, make it mandatory.
4. There's no such thing as too much Michael Moore.
3. More, not fewer, CBS News exposes.
2. That's right, you guessed it; "I'm Hillary Rodham Clinton and I'm reporting for duty."
And the number 1 way for Demoncrats to regain the majority...
1. Explain to 51% of the electorate that they're stupid. They will eventually realize that you are smarter than they are and will vote as you tell them to. It has only taken them this long because they really are sooo ing stoopid.
You're welcome
Again..it is DEMOCRAT.
Get it right man!!!!!
Or what?
Or nothing...just looking for a little respect.
I figured you'd be a good winner, although your libertarian candidate got punked, and stop the hating...but I understand and don't worry..maybe..in a few decades a few light years there just may a libertarian candidate with a prayer.
Or do only conservative candidates pray?
I don't hate, Joe.
There are Democrats (who are ideologically challenged) and there are Demoncrats (who are ideologically challenged and willing to do anything to force that ideology on the rest of us).
I don't speak ill of Democrats...just Demoncrats and, Joe, this election hasn't done anything to stop their desire for power.
isn't that just a little hate? :pThere are Democrats (who are ideologically challenged)
Heheh, being called ideology challenged is better than being called a God hater. I'm referring to the right winged extremist Dr. James Dobson who went on George Stephanopoulos' show and called Democratic senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont a "God-people hater" and provided no evidence of any statements Leahy had made to indicate that he was against the Christian faith.
Being told I’m immoral for endorsing one candidate over another is unbelievably frustrating.
My point is that extremists on both sides really agitate me to no end. The less of them, the better for America.
Sounds like some right wing Christian nut jobs I know.
" I didn't vote!" "I don't really care who president is"......Guess who!!!!!
I would agree.My point is that extremists on both sides really agitate me to no end. The less of them, the better for America.
Nope, just a fact.
Seriously, my nuts are getting tired it's time for you to get off of them." I didn't vote!" "I don't really care who president is"......Guess who!!!!!
It hasn't stopped the republicans either. Do you think they would have campaigned so hard if they didn't?
actually its not a fact. its your opinion, to which you are en led. I am sure there are democrats on this board who think you are equally challenged. Doesn't mean they are right, its their opinion.
IHMO, everyone has an opinion and more often than not it goes against yours.
The Republicans campaigned hard because they knew the Demoncrats would cause our Republic to spin into oblivion. It had nothing to do with power...
And, Democrats are ideologically challenged...it's a fact. Look it up!
#1 without a doubt. I cannot think of a more compelling political argument than "you're an idiot if you don't agree with us."
Oh you cannot be serious. Of course the republicans wanted to keep the power in the House and Senate!
Where the have you been.
Do you really think Bush doesn't get a hard-on when he swaggers across the White House lawn knowing he is the most powerful man on earth!?
Of course it's about power..deep down they all like the precious.
amen!Being told I’m immoral for endorsing one candidate over another is unbelievably frustrating.
My point is that extremists on both sides really agitate me to no end. The less of them, the better for America.
It's all about motivation.
Oh, I get it. Power is the motivation!
I believe it is for the Demoncrats...yes.
For the Republicans, it was survival of the nation.
Oh please. Brahahahahahaha!!!!
You just made me spit and guffaw!!
What are you? A spazz or something? (Spazz's aren't a protected class, are they?)Oh please. Brahahahahahaha!!!!
You just made me spit and guffaw!!
Seriously though; think about the last two candidates the Demoncrats have fielded for President. Both spent their entire lives, all of it, since birth, being prepped for the office of President (Gore more so than Kerry). It was always about holding the office, for them...never what they'd do with it if they won. Need I remind you of Kerry's "I have a plan..." mantra?
Bill Clinton, on the other hand (the last winning Demoncrat), came from humble beginnings and mispent his youth, just like the current President, obviously with not inkling of the future they'd fulfill.
Yeah, I think there's something to it. Not as simple as I'm making it out to be here...but, none-the-less, I think it fits.
Perhaps Dubya wanted to follow in daddy's steps...without the tripping that is..and once he felt the power of the Oval office (the precious) he was hooked and wanted re-election so bad he could taste it.
Just a thought.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
