Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 90
  1. #1
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Tancredo: Ban minority caucuses
    By Anne C. Mulkern


    Washington - Colorado's Tom Tancredo wants to abolish the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Black Caucus and Asian Pacific American Caucus.

    Tancredo, a Republican congressman from Littleton, repeated his call today for the elimination of all special interest factions within Congress that are pegged to ethnic groups. He first asked for a rule change to ban the groups in 2003.

    "It is utterly hypocritical for Congress to extol the virtues of a color-blind society while officially sanctioning caucuses that are based solely on race - and restrict their membership based on race," Tancredo wrote in a letter to Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald, D-Calif, who is in charge of the House's numerous caucuses.

    When Tancredo previously said the caucuses should be eliminated, a member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus called that statement "more race-baiting" by Tancredo. The black, Hispanic and Asian-American caucuses exist because few members of Congress come from those racial groups and they need a unified voice, said Rep. Raul M. Grijalva, D-Ariz.
    Denver Post

    This is the same guy who favors building a 3,000 miles fence along the whole U.S. and Mexico border. Tancredo is also a vocal supporter of vigilante groups along the Arizona and Texas Mexican border.

  2. #2
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    He should try to start a white male caucus.

  3. #3
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    I hear Tancracker is mulling a presidential bid.

  4. #4
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    He should try to start a white male caucus.
    That's precisely the reason the others should be banned. Racial caucuses are racially discriminatory and, in federal ins ution like Congress, that should be -- if it's not -- a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  5. #5
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    If it's a violation, Tancredo should sue.

    Otherwise, I don't see why it's such a big deal. It's a caucus.

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    "racially discriminatory"

    the Repug and Dem members in Congress make up "groups" just like ethnic caucuses, nobody is calling the Repug and Dem parties discriminatory. People are free to assemble into whatever the groups they want to assemble into. But I'm not surprised a right-winger racist nutter is against ethnic caucuses.

  7. #7
    Believe. BradLohaus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    1,343
    "It is utterly hypocritical for Congress to extol the virtues of a color-blind society while officially sanctioning caucuses that are based solely on race - and restrict their membership based on race,"

    It's pretty hard to argue with that statement.

  8. #8
    Homer 2centsworth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    8,677
    "It is utterly hypocritical for Congress to extol the virtues of a color-blind society while officially sanctioning caucuses that are based solely on race - and restrict their membership based on race,"

    It's pretty hard to argue with that statement.
    that's too logical for the libs. It just doesn't "feel" right to them.

  9. #9
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    These are the kinds of groups that banded together after a certain races oppression.

  10. #10
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    "racially discriminatory"

    the Repug and Dem members in Congress make up "groups" just like ethnic caucuses, nobody is calling the Repug and Dem parties discriminatory. People are free to assemble into whatever the groups they want to assemble into. But I'm not surprised a right-winger racist nutter is against ethnic caucuses.
    So, you'd be okay with a Congressional White Caucus?

  11. #11
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    These are the kinds of groups that banded together after a certain races oppression.
    And, not a one among 'em is suffering oppression now. Why? Because the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids discrimination on the grounds of race.

    You'd think a race that fought so hard to realize that simple principle would also realize how stupid it is to form a exclusive race-based caucus.

  12. #12
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    Yeah, that civil rights act has left the country without even a hint of racism.

  13. #13
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Yeah, that civil rights act has left the country without even a hint of racism.
    Obviously not, we have the racist Congressional Black Caucus.

  14. #14
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    So, you'd be okay with a Congressional White Caucus?
    Sure, which of your buddies would be in it?

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    "you'd be okay with a Congressional White Caucus?"

    sure, why not? The Southern Repugs are already a de facto White Supremacy Caucus.

  16. #16
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    "It is utterly hypocritical for Congress to extol the virtues of a color-blind society while officially sanctioning caucuses that are based solely on race - and restrict their membership based on race,"

    It's pretty hard to argue with that statement.
    Except that we don't actually live in a color blind society. Extol away, but it doesn't exist.

    Typical GOP stunt, though. I'm betting that the members who "wanted" to join would have beat feet, quicktime, had they actually been offered membership. They don't really want to spend time around minorities, just pandering to their racist base.

  17. #17
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    Sure, which of your buddies would be in it?

    why pick a fight?

  18. #18
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    why pick a fight?
    Because it's all he knows how to do.

  19. #19
    Damn The Man Mr. Peabody's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    4,475
    So, you'd be okay with a Congressional White Caucus?
    I thought they had one. It's called the GOP.

  20. #20
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    I thought they had one. It's called the GOP.

  21. #21
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    I thought they had one. It's called the GOP.

    I didn't know discriminating against moonbats was a crime.

  22. #22
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    That's precisely the reason the others should be banned. Racial caucuses are racially discriminatory and, in federal ins ution like Congress, that should be -- if it's not -- a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    Why are they racially discriminatory? They don't possess any meaningful power; they're largely social clubs of similarly-situated individuals who can do little more than discuss particular problems and desired solutions.

    If you're claiming that they're discriminatory because they disinclude those who aren't similarly-situated, do you have proof that a group like the Congressional Black Caucus affirmatively excludes those who aren't black, or is that just your assumption?

  23. #23
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    They do. I believe a white Democrat from a black-majority district tried to join and was turned down.

    I agree that it's not a big deal. Just something else Republicans are playing up out of Obamaphobia.

  24. #24
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    It's going to take more than a white Republican to eliminate these groups, and I don't think it will ever be successful if it's attempted by force.

  25. #25
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    "you'd be okay with a Congressional White Caucus?"

    sure, why not? The Southern Repugs are already a de facto White Supremacy Caucus.
    White Supremacy Caucus? That's pretty ing ignorant, considering most of those 'southern' Repugs come from populations that have a lot of minorities.

    328,382,103rd time you've talked out of your ass, so I guess what's new?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •