Dubya's Worst Fear

[Nbadan]

Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh strikes again...

Seymour M. Hersh
November 20, 2006:

If the Democrats won on November 7th, the Vice-President said, that victory would not stop the Administration from pursuing a military option with Iran. The White House would put “shorteners” on any legislative restrictions, Cheney said, and thus stop Congress from getting in its way.

The White House’s concern was not that the Democrats would cut off funds for the war in Iraq but that future legislation would prohibit it from financing operations targeted at overthrowing or destabilizing the Iranian government, to keep it from getting the bomb. “They’re afraid that Congress is going to vote a binding resolution to stop a hit on Iran, à la Nicaragua in the Contra war,” a former senior intelligence official told me.

In late 1982, Edward P. Boland, a Democratic representative, introduced the first in a series of “Boland amendments,” which limited the Reagan Administration’s ability to support the Contras, who were working to overthrow Nicaragua’s left-wing Sandinista government. The Boland restrictions led White House officials to orchestrate illegal fund-raising activities for the Contras, including the sale of American weapons, via Israel, to Iran. The result was the Iran-Contra scandal of the mid-eighties.

Cheney’s story, according to the source, was his way of saying that, whatever a Democratic Congress might do next year to limit the President’s authority, the Administration would find a way to work around it. (In response to a request for comment, the Vice-President’s office said that it had no record of the discussion.) .....Cheney is emphatic about Iraq. In late October, he told Time, “I know what the President thinks,” about Iraq. “I know what I think. And we’re not looking for an exit strategy. We’re looking for victory.”

He is equally clear that the Administration would, if necessary, use force against Iran. “The United States is keeping all options on the table in addressing the irresponsible conduct of the regime,” he told an Israeli lobbying group early this year. “And we join other nations in sending that regime a clear message: we will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”

The New Yorker

Jeffery Goldberg writes in the New Yorker...

“Things are going to get a lot harder in the next month or two. If we’re going to stop this, we have to stop it before the new troops get to Iraq. You’re not going to cut off their funds once they’re there. The window is closing. The country is way ahead of the Senate on this.”

--

Liberal, moonbat conspiracy theory, right?

...my hope, however, is that this nonbinding resolution doesn’t try to turn into a binding policy

- George Bush Today.

Congress really needs to get busy and tie the NeoCons hands on resources to attack Iran.

[boutons_]

I say let the Legislative Repugs defend the Exec so they will all get ed again in 2008 elections, even worse than they would be just for the Iraq up.

The Exec isn't the only branch with exclusive responsibility for exercising checks and balances.

THE PNAC/AEI/neo- s will up the govt and the US even more if not stopped.
head is really an evil force that must be negated.