Legislature Ready To Neuter Abbott's Social Security Redaction Opinion
by Bob Dunn, Feb 27, 2007, 05 00 pm
Disturbed at a recent opinion by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott that has resulted in the removal of public real estate records around the state, two powerful industries are preparing to neuter that opinion, via the Texas Legislature.
Abbott opened a Pandora’s box when he issued a complex interpretation of the Texas Public Information Act last week. In it, he stated in part that Texas county clerks “must redact Social Security numbers of living persons from records” under their control “prior to making those records available on the Internet.”
Failure to do so, the opinion states, could amount to “distribution of confidential information under the PIA,” which “cons utes official misconduct and a criminal misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000, confinement in the county jail for up to six months, or both.”
But sources say the le industry and oil and gas industry have championed legislation being prepared for a hearing Wednesday that would simply remove a section in the Public Information Act excepting Social Security numbers from provisions of the act.
Also, a spokesperson for Houston’s Stewart le, one of the largest le operations in the country, said Tuesday evening the company is “contemplating filing litigation” as the result the changing access to public do ents.
Faced with potential criminal action as the result of Abbott’s opinion, but with no way to immediately remove Social Security numbers from already existing records, Texas county clerks were advised by lawyers for the Texas Association of Counties to remove records from public access absent a strong written opinion by their county attorneys.
Unable to to obtain public real estate records vital to their businesses, le companies, mortgage companies, oil and gas companies and a host of other businesses have apparently grown concerned.
For example, the Texas Land le Association said in an email to members that it is working with the Legislature on a “fast-track” bill to dissolve the paperwork bottleneck they believe Abbott’s opinion has caused. The oil and gas industry is pursuing a similar remedy.
In fact, sources say, both industries are counting on House Bill 2061, authored by Texas House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jim Keffer.
Keffer staff members said Tuesday more language will be added to the bill. In its current form, it simply repeals section 552.147 of the Texas Government Code, effective immediately if it receives a two-thirds member vote.
Section 552.147 is a portion of the Texas Public Information Act added by the 79th Legislature, which says: “(a) The social security number of a living person is excepted from the requirements of Section0 552.021.” and “(b) A governmental body may redact the social security number of a living person from any information the governmental body discloses under Section0 552.021 without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general under Subchapter G.”
A spokeswoman for Keffer said the hope is that H.B. 2061 will render Abbott’s opinion moot, since it was issued in response to a question over whether language in Section 552.147 is mandatory or elective. If that section doesn’t exist, neither does a legal reason for Abbott’s opinion.
H.B. 2061 is scheduled for a hearing at 9 a.m. Wednesday before the House Energy Resources Committee.
Meanwhile, Wilson said Tuesday her office staff is redacting Social Security numbers and drivers license numbers from real and personal property records by hand as real estate records roll in – at a clip of about 2,000 do ents per day.
She also said her staff is redacting private data by hand from do ents requested by members of the public. But because of the unwieldy process, people are being limited to a maximum of 10 do ent requests per day.
And, they only can obtain copies of public records in person at the courthouse, because images of the county clerk’s real estate records have been taken off line.
A le industry official said Harris County real estate records also were taken off-line Tuesday, although that could not be independently confirmed late Tuesday afternoon. Access to real estate records has been denied or limited in counties across the state.
Wilson said she and an assistant have been manning four phone lines for the past two days, dealing with sometimes-heated attorneys, business officials and individuals trying to obtain records.
Between the phones and the manual redaction, “everyone leaves here at the end of the day with their tongues hanging out and their eyes pretty dry,” she added.