Was that before or after the St. Patrick's Day embarrassment?![]()
I looked at them this morning and Spurs are still on top.
I looked across the stat lineand noticed that Dallas was ahead in most of the areas stated. I was just wondering what stat he uses that moves the Spurs ahead of the Mavs?
Not talking trash here, or complaining, Just wondering what stat puts them over the top?
Was that before or after the St. Patrick's Day embarrassment?![]()
Dallas' win against Detroit was a win without Chauncey, that would most likely not gain them a spot in the rankings. It was a rather close game too.
I think point differential is what Hollinger puts first, not wins and losses.
two of our better defenders were out as well (buckner and devean) but whatever, i have long ago stopped trying to figure out holinger's rankings because none of that really matters now, we're too close to the playoffs to pay attention to such garbage
Someone's a little bitter.we're too close to the playoffs to pay attention to such garbage
You're just mad cuz the Spurs are on the top.![]()
Waaah,
Hunter was out for the Pistons who is a better defender than Buckner and Devean combined, Waaah!
Yes and they need to start soon while the Suns still have the #2 seed locked up...
im pretty sure its locked up. too bad it won't mean much. like the old saying goes...
offense wins games... but defense wins championships.
so touchy, i wasn't complaining, we won that game, no need to whine
i'd rather be on top of the division and the conference than hollinger's rankings but thanks for playing!
Hmmm....I'm sure Billups 6 points and 13 minutes help seal that beating they gave the Suns....???
"they were without billups" what a crap excuse
Yeah, no kidding.
The Hollinger rankings suck to me (no offense to Mr. Hollinger or any stat geeks). I understand that there's a lot of stats and thought going into them, but that all doesn't translate to the basketball court. I guess they serve their purpose, but I just think it's funny that before the Spurs winning streak, they were number 1 in the Hollinger rankings, during the peak of the win streak - still number 1. Now after losing to two of the embarrassments of the NBA, they are still on top
Please. Even statistically the Spurs have fluctuated quite a bit. (i.e. their defense tightening during the win streak).
Anyway, I wish the frickin' playoffs would hurry up and start.
I don't.![]()
Amen, it's all I think about these days, I think (HOPE!) the matchups will provide for some very good games/series. I could see several series going the distance.
I'd rather have this
than this
![]()
Spurs fans are so predictable sometimes.
and THERE IT IS folks, another mention of the "3 rings"i knew it was coming sooner or later!
i have learned to refrain from commenting to the lord of the ring(s) posts...it will never end...if by some chance, the mavs get one ring, then it will be "well, we still have 3"![]()
Let me apologize to Mavs fan. Regular season records are what's REALLY important.![]()
i prefer to live in the present but if you'd rather pine after your past as a defensive tactic then be my guest.
This is pretty recent Mavs history.
![]()
Dude, I had no idea the Spurs won 3 les... my whole world has been flipped upside down...
*kneels*
note to self: be nice to ronmexico every once in awhile![]()
Thanks. You're right about the first one. 50 games isn't nearly enough. Personally, I think we really need about 150 games to see who are the best teams. Hey, wait a minute. Don't all NBA teams (except the most putrid) make the playoffs anyway? Ok, nevermind my 150 games comment.
Next.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)