Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    ... and the 9th seed being -3L from 8th, this is very probably the final WC seeding:


  2. #2
    God Talks To Me. angel_luv's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    24,451
    Ah... when I saw the WC thread le, I thought World Championships...

  3. #3
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    what the is this 2-2-1-1-1 format? is this for real?

    I don't like it at all. for the home or away team.

  4. #4
    --- SAtown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    8,265
    what the is this 2-2-1-1-1 format? is this for real?

    I don't like it at all. for the home or away team.
    It's been like that forever (except the 1st round when it was 2-2-1). The finals have always been 2-3-2

  5. #5
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,475
    what the is this 2-2-1-1-1 format? is this for real?

    I don't like it at all. for the home or away team.
    It's been that way for a damn long time (except in NBA finals).

  6. #6
    God Talks To Me. angel_luv's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    24,451
    I forgot.. how is the format usually?

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,475
    I forgot.. how is the format usually?
    Nothing has changed.

  8. #8
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    what the is this 2-2-1-1-1 format? is this for real?

    I don't like it at all. for the home or away team.
    Why don't you like it? It's the fairest way. The 2-3-2 in the NBA Finals is what sucks and isn't fair.

  9. #9
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    It's been like that forever (except the 1st round when it was 2-2-1). The finals have always been 2-3-2
    Actually, back in the day, (well, back before 1985) the Finals were a 2-2-1-1-1 format as well.

    Here's the schedule from the 1984 Finals, for example:

    Game 1 (1984-05-27 at BOS)
    Game 2 (1984-05-31 at BOS)
    Game 3 (1984-06-03 at LAL)
    Game 4 (1984-06-06 at LAL)
    Game 5 (1984-06-08 at BOS)
    Game 6 (1984-06-10 at LAL)
    Game 7 (1984-06-12 at BOS)

  10. #10
    --- SAtown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    8,265
    Actually, back in the day, (well, back before 1985) the Finals were a 2-2-1-1-1 format as well.
    Gotcha, my bad

  11. #11
    Veteran
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,033
    I think they went 2-3-2 in the finals because LA and Boston played just about every year in the finals. If they didn't play Boston, it was Philadelphia or Detroit.

  12. #12
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    If it plays out like this, those are going to be two very entertaining semifinals, followed by one of a western conf. final.


    Let's get it on!


    ... and the 9th seed being -3L from 8th, this is very probably the final WC seeding:


  13. #13
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    I think they went 2-3-2 in the finals because LA and Boston played just about every year in the finals. If they didn't play Boston, it was Philadelphia or Detroit.
    Yeah, you are right, the distance was why they did it originally. But I still hate the 2-3-2 for the hometeam.

  14. #14
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    I think boutons is right, though about the end game at the bottom of the West draw.

    Here are the loss totals for the 5 teams that would still seem to have a shot at 7-8 (total games played through Monday in parentheses):

    34 -- DEN (69)
    36 -- LAC (70)
    38 -- NOH (70)
    39 -- GST (72)
    39 -- MIN (69)

    Here's the tiebreaker situations with those teams:

    DEN v. LAC -- series tied 1-1, 1 game remains (@LAC)
    DEN v. NOK -- NOK leads series 2-1, 1 game remains (@NOK)
    DEN v. GST -- DEN wins series 3-1
    DEN v. MIN -- MIN leads 2-1, 1 game remains (@DEN)

    LAC v. NOK -- LAC leads 2-0, 2 games remain (@NOK, @LAC)
    LAC v. GST -- series tied 2-2
    LAC v. MIN -- MIN win series 2-1

    NOK v. GST -- GST wins series 3-1
    NOK v. MIN -- NOK leads 2-1, 1 game remains (@MIN)

    GST v. MIN -- series tied 1-1, 1 game remains (@GST)

  15. #15
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,475
    Yeah, you are right, the distance was why they did it originally. But I still hate the 2-3-2 for the hometeam.
    I never cared until last season when I was ready for the Mavs to get the out of Miami after 2 games

    Side note: There was another reference (from Avery) in the paper last week to how poorly the Mav players handled being in Miami (and up 2-0). It's been mentioned several times (very vaguely) that some or all of them were having too good of a time down there. I just wish we knew more details.

  16. #16
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    I never cared until last season when I was ready for the Mavs to get the out of Miami after 2 games

    Side note: There was another reference (from Avery) in the paper last week to how poorly the Mav players handled being in Miami (and up 2-0). It's been mentioned several times (very vaguely) that some or all of them were having too good of a time down there. I just wish we knew more details.
    I do think that's one major drawback of the Finals schedule. ABC has been insistent upon this Tuesday, Thursday, Sunday schedule for the Finals, which means that the team with HCA has to be on the road for an entire week, barring a sweep. In 2005, the Spurs won Game 2 in SA on a Sunday evening, flew to Detroit on Monday and didn't leave until Horry had broken hearts the following Sunday. They can't leave, because there's so much media availability required. So, they're just kind of stuck there.

  17. #17
    Dirk Administers THE SHOCKER LEONARD's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    8,576
    what the is this 2-2-1-1-1 format? is this for real?

    I don't like it at all. for the home or away team.
    Big NBA fan are ya?

    Why don't you like it? It's the fairest way. The 2-3-2 in the NBA Finals is what sucks and isn't fair.
    Exactly...2-3-2 blows ass...

  18. #18
    Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Viva Las Espuelas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    19,497
    Side note: There was another reference (from Avery) in the paper last week to how poorly the Mav players handled being in Miami (and up 2-0). It's been mentioned several times (very vaguely) that some or all of them were having too good of a time down there. I just wish we knew more details.
    i heard that hee-haw got sloshed every night out there. i believe that 'cause a co-worker of mine ran into hee-haw, devin, and marquis at a club and she told me he was stumblin' by the end of the night. people even have pics on their myspace with hee-haw and you can tell he's toasted by the glazed over eyes.

  19. #19
    Believe. Tbiggums's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    44
    ... and the 9th seed being -3L from 8th, this is very probably the final WC seeding:


    Nice grahic!

  20. #20
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,475
    i heard that hee-haw got sloshed every night out there. i believe that 'cause a co-worker of mine ran into hee-haw, devin, and marquis at a club and she told me he was stumblin' by the end of the night. people even have pics on their myspace with hee-haw and you can tell he's toasted by the glazed over eyes.
    Who is hee-haw?

  21. #21
    <(*_*)>
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    901
    what the is this 2-2-1-1-1 format?

  22. #22
    Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Viva Las Espuelas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    19,497
    Who is hee-haw?
    Josh "Hee-Haw" Howard



    it's all in the teeth

  23. #23
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    2,321
    Houston should beat Dallas.

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    The original image came from sports site a 2 or 3 years ago.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    3,868
    Here’s my prediction of this bracket, if it turned out this way by the start of the playoffs, my predictions are of how this bracket is played out on the image. So I picked Utah winning the first round, but the poster of this image didn't....so in second round since Houston is there, I picked Dallas 4-0 over Houston.

    First Round:

    Dallas over LAC, 4-0.
    Utah over Houston, 4-2.
    Suns over Nuggets, 4-1
    Spurs over Lakers, 4-2 but I’m learning more towards 4-1.

    [I'd much, much rather see Dallas face GS in the first round, and Utah in the second. LAC and Houston won't do jack vs Dallas in the first and second rounds]

    Second Round:

    Dallas over Houston, 4-0.
    Spurs over Suns, 4-3.

    WCF:

    It’s a toss-up. Expect Manu to do some unbelievable things.
    Last edited by SpursDynasty; 03-27-2007 at 08:02 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •