So still think the towers were brought down without bombs?

[The_Worlds_finest]

Odds are you wont watch before you post ignorant rantings, but this video pretty much leaves nothing in debate....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIgoXQWiSlM

[clambake]

So, firemen claim to know that bombs are in the building, and yet, they go in anyway.

I'm convinced. Or.......do any of the cars in the parking garage have gas tanks?

[mookie2001]

Or.......do any of the cars in the parking garage have gas tanks?

thats the stupidest stuff ive ever heard. Its not just firemen, witnesses and workers of all sorts describing bombs and explosions. There were no kitchens/car tanks to explain it

[The_Worlds_finest]

So, firemen claim to know that bombs are in the building, and yet, they go in anyway.

I'm convinced. Or.......do any of the cars in the parking garage have gas tanks?

Think bud...for one second...how could the gas tanks blow up when the fires were in the tops of the buildings....things that make you go hmmm

[whottt]

SO basically, flying the planes into the WTC wasn't enough for the Govt to mobilize the people for war....

Much better to risk all sorts of and leave all sorts of evidence to needlesly bring the buildings totally to the ground.



What was gained by dropping the buildings completely to the ground?

[clambake]

The firemen were already covered in dust. Pretty sure it had a parking garage since I've parked there before. My car had a gas tank. The car I have now has a gas tank. Good to know the fire was contained to only the tops of both buildings. Doesn't explain why the fires burned for weeks, however.

[clambake]

Maybe the democrats were trying to frame the white house staff.

Diabolical.

[papsmirnoff]

since terrorists flew the plane into the buildings it's not possible that they also planted bombs inside the building as well?????

[The_Worlds_finest]

"What was gained by dropping the buildings completely to the ground?"
First the guy who owned the buildings tripled up in the value of the buildings on insurance claims.(btw wtc 7 was owned by the same guy)
2nd the buildings were going to need to be renovated to meet NYC building code pertaining to asbestos city standards.
3rd make room for the new "freedom center"( ever read 1984)

Clambake I know there was parking in the basement and yes cars tanks can explode but you really think it would be that loud under the mass of the towers? And yeah the fires burning for weeks is another tell tell sign...check this out too, BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 before it even happened...wanna see the clip?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEtqN04Hl7w

It brings lots to the table but its not like the media has reported Inaccurately before

[mookie2001]

since terrorists flew the plane into the buildings it's not possible that they also planted bombs inside the building as well?????

yes. Of course, what a great post

[jochhejaam]

In its section examining the attack on the World Trade Center, Loose Change includes several statements by people who say they heard secondary explosions in the buildings, which the video interprets as evidence that the buildings were destroyed in a controlled demolition.
But this ignores the commonsense explanation that secondary explosions could have been caused by vaporized fuel or electrical short-circuits in the severely damaged buildings. Demolition professionals say controlled demolition of the towers that day would have been impossible.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=182874

[The_Worlds_finest]

In its section examining the attack on the World Trade Center, Loose Change includes several statements by people who say they heard secondary explosions in the buildings, which the video interprets as evidence that the buildings were destroyed in a controlled demolition.
But this ignores the commonsense explanation that secondary explosions could have been caused by vaporized fuel or electrical short-circuits in the severely damaged buildings. Demolition professionals say controlled demolition of the towers that day would have been impossible.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=182874

oh god so now my eyes are lying to me too?
"the common sense explanation"
heres one for your common sense explanation
Why was all the remains shipped off and recycled before any true investigation could be done....

[Spurminator]

First the guy who owned the buildings tripled up in the value of the buildings on insurance claims.(btw wtc 7 was owned by the same guy)
2nd the buildings were going to need to be renovated to meet NYC building code pertaining to asbestos city standards.
3rd make room for the new "freedom center"( ever read 1984)

Then why bow them up during work hours? Could these ends have been accomplished with a conveniently-timed Saturday night terrorist attack?

[whottt]

Well it's just good to know that Jets flying into building won't collpase them....


Boy Bush is stupid...think of how much time and energy we could have saved if'd we just framed Saddam instead of Usama...

Come to think of it...since Usama is on our payroll and doing Bush's bidding...why didn't he just implicate Saddam?



Oh whatever...as long as Bush=Bad who cares whether or not it's logical...right?

See any good bumper stickers lately? I've heard that's the #1 way Libs expand their political knowledge these days.

[whottt]

Then why bow them up during work hours? Could these ends have been accomplished with a conveniently-timed Saturday night terrorist attack?

Nah...Bush likes flirting with danger...he wanted to set himself up to be worse than Hitler, just so the guy that owned the WTC could get paid. And if we'd gone straight into Iraq the public would have villified him and accused him of all sorts of evil conspiracies...


Possible Treason and execution = because sometimes, 2 jets aren't enough.

[mookie2001]

nobody said anything about bush?

[jochhejaam]

oh god so now my eyes are lying to me too?
"the common sense explanation"
heres one for your common sense explanation
Why was all the remains shipped off and recycled before any true investigation could be done....

No refuting the "commonsense explanations"?
Surprise...

[The_Worlds_finest]

let me guess since im questioning the american government "I must hate freedom and democracy!" and if not for the bush and the government "I would rather wear a turban then fight!" anything else you want to parrot from the media?

[whottt]

Clinton? They tried it when he was Pres too.

[whottt]

let me guess since im questioning the american government "I must hate freedom and democracy!" and if not for the bush and the government "I would rather wear a turban then fight!" anything else you want to parrot from the media?

You aren't questioning the American Govt...

You are indicting it...based on youtube.

Trial by Youtube
based on evidence contaiend in catchy bumperstickers...
And oh yeah...there is that picture of Rumsfeld with Saddam back then...that proves something, every single time.



even Moore has more credibility than that...at least he admits he lies.

[jochhejaam]

let me guess since im questioning the american government "I must hate freedom and democracy!" and if not for the bush and the government "I would rather wear a turban then fight!" anything else you want to parrot from the media?

Paranoia setting in...

[clambake]

This could explain the youtube lawsuit. It's brilliant!

[ChumpDumper]

Do the producers of 24 know their music is being used for this?

[PixelPusher]

Do the producers of 24 know their music is being used for this?

How do you know the producers of 24 weren't on the 9/11 attack to begin with? Is is coincindence their show is so much more popular after 9/11? Think about it, man!!!!! [/CONSPIRATORIAL RANT]

[mookie2001]

still cant figure out why foxnews and cnn will talk about charlie sheen, rosie odonnell non-stop, call them crazy, slander them in multiple segments across all their programming but STILL will not mention one thing about building 7