Reply With Quote
7 for 12
1 for 4 on 3's
1 for 4 on FT's
Total: 9 outta 20
Best game of the year. He was in total control offesively.
7 for 12
1 for 4 on 3's
1 for 4 on FT's
Total: 9 outta 20
hats off to Tony...glad there is a topic to celebrate a great Spurs comeback
That's horrible math. I'll help you, the 7-12 included the 1-4 from 3's. So using your screwy stat it's still 8 for 16, but don't see how you give equal weight to 1pts like 2pts.7 for 12
1 for 4 on 3's
1 for 4 on FT's
Total: 9 outta 20
Last edited by 2centsworth; 11-20-2004 at 10:17 AM.
You're right about the screwy math.Had a brain fart. I guess that happens when you work 48 hours in 4 days.
Yes indeed. 7-16. Still less than 50%. I don't see how that qualifies as "Great".
Because if you included ft% Duncan and Shaq never had a good game in their lives. Plus, there's a lot more to basketball than just scoring. You need to get more sleep.Yes indeed. 7-16. Still less than 50%. I don't see how that qualifies as "Great".
Perhaps because he was also referring to the way TP ran the offense?Yes indeed. 7-16. Still less than 50%. I don't see how that qualifies as "Great".
WTF? Stick to football.
Oh yeah, the Spurs played last night! I almost forgot!
who cares?? didn't you see the fight!
jk
Yes indeed. 7-16. Still less than 50%. I don't see how that qualifies as "Great".
I've never heard anyone combine a players FG and FT numbers to determine if they had a good game. 7-for-12 from the field is great for Tony so far this year. 1-4 from the line sucks, but it doesn't take away from his FG%.
I'll agree with that.
R.I.P. credibility.
I told you all that that Hedo sucked early in the season last year. I was slammed for that but I was right. I told you all that Manu is a better player than Parker. I was slammed for that but Manu is proving that I was right. I said that the Spurs would not win the Championship last year. I was right.
My Math and stat skills may be lacking after a long work week but my credibility is just fine thanks.
A lot of people thought Hedo sucked early on. I went off about it from the day he was signed.
We are just saying that it's odd to add in FT stats to FG stats when determining a good game.
Long-term, Manu may not be a better player than Parker. Parker's career just got started.
You know it would be nice if you actually put forth an argument, IceColdBull ti, which consisted of something other than "Parker sucks because I say so."
It's obvious that you don't understand the game or understand where Parker is at in his career and why that is quite impressive, to say the least. So shut your hole already.
Now you're just makin sh!t up Markie. For the record. I never said Parker sucks. This all started when I told a few Parker homers (who already had him in the hall of fame) that they were overrating him.
Parker doesn't suck. But he isn't great either. At this point I'd call him slightly better than average.
Sure.
Tony just needs to go back to his old form, playing his style of game and letting the game come to him.
I'm as critical of tony than anybody, but like to acknowledge the good as well as the bad. Tony played a very good game last night.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
