Reply With Quote
Why would tiny squibs be needed when 20 or 30 floors of building were already crashing down onto the lower floors?
Please instead of believing your own eyes link me to some "expert" explaning away the obvious explosions...
Why would tiny squibs be needed when 20 or 30 floors of building were already crashing down onto the lower floors?
they are explosive denoted to blow out some load bearing structure. Ofcourse these werent the ONLY ones caught on camera these "squids" were caught uniformlly detonating the entire length of both buildings demise...plus yes they are tiny but only when compared to the enormouse structure they came from
The windows are load bearing structures?
(So your going to duck this piece of evidence)
No the windows are not load bearing but the outside s , if you will, is.
(I'm not ducking anything) But the s isn't exploding out. The windows are.
The s is being crushed from above like everything else.
If the burst were in the natural sequence of a building collapsing on itself would they have been perfectly uniform as they are this collapse? Also in other shots of the same style of burst the location is roughly 5 times lower from the "collapse" zone then these.
Now if you want to see the obvious charges that displaced the outside check these out.
The flashes ofcourse can be seen throughout the entire collapse sequence, in the clip I took this freeze shot from one can clearly see the collapse of the first tower trigger one of these flash charges in the opposite building.
If you like, look to a source you find creditable for the video and you will notice them too...
There's nothing uniform about them. falls down to lower floors and displaces air and other material. Result: shooting out of windows.If the burst were in the natural sequence of a building collapsing on itself would they have been perfectly uniform as they are this collapse? Also in other shots of the same style of burst the location is roughly 5 times lower from the "collapse" zone then theseMaybe if you showed a flash in the opposite building, that might have made sense.The flashes ofcourse can be seen throughout the entire collapse sequence, in the clip I took this freeze shot from one can clearly see the collapse of the first tower trigger one of these flash charges in the opposite building.
But really, once the tower got to that state where the top thirty floors are coming off at that angle, there's hardly a need for any additional tiny flash charges.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 04-15-2007 at 10:42 PM.
The bursts occur almost like clockwork in the collapse footage, infact I would not be surprised if there is not a near perfect delay between each burst from the buildings as the top comes crashing down.
As for the charge in the other building, I will get that to you, I will even send you video via email. But I cannot right now I have dialup at home but ill gladly send it to you from school tommorow.
That's the whole point. 30 acres of office building is already crashing down. What else needs to be done?The bursts occur almost like clockwork in the collapse footage, infact I would not be surprised if there is not a near perfect delay between each burst from the buildings as the top comes crashing down.
as sick as it sounds yes the charges would need to go of to complete the demolishment...as a clip of the second collapse backs up. I doubt youve see the footage I speak of but the second tower to fall did not fall completely. Roughly 40 stories of the inner core still stood, but seconds later it falls perfectly on itself in a straight down movement.
Why would the demolishment need to be "completed"? Why would it be such a bad thing to leave a few floors of the inner core standing if the rest of the building was already gone?
Easier cleanup...
Who would give a crap about cleanup?
If your gonna to the job do it right...
Leaving behind video "evidence" of your conspiracy is doing it right?
If you are going to conspire you aren't going to have explosions that can be seen. Why would Bush give a crap about the clean-up?
It doesn't. Make. Sense.
It actually makes LESS sense than the official 9/11 report.
Also, all your "facts" are actually assumptions -- you have no idea if they are explosions or lights flashing or debris flying from pressure.
so am i to believe the "fact" that since Satam al Suqami passport was found at ground zero he was on the plane.
Last edited by The_Worlds_finest; 04-16-2007 at 01:16 AM.
Mouse.
Nice correction. Where did you get the idea it was Atta's?
And the purpose of this being planted is...?
If you are going to conspire away, it should at least explain the motive.
They recovered two from flight 93 also.
Frankly, I don't think this admin is skilled enough to cover-up 9/11, they can't even cover wiretaps, gitmo, yellowcake, that "secret" memo, or anything.
I mean, how hard is it to keep a memo secret.
Why does everyone assume it was 'this administration'?
Who is it then?
Go back and read up on TWA800. That was before the Neocons...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
