Reply With Quote
Too bad we still have to deal with the Bushisms and the FoxNewsisms.
...to the Ratherisms.
Too bad we still have to deal with the Bushisms and the FoxNewsisms.
What's not to love? You must be one of those misunderestimators...
Yep, too bad...for you.
Not really because I don't watch FoxNews and I'm as confused as the next guy when Dubya talks.
Confusion, among Liberals, has been rampant for about 14 years now. Just look at your last two posts. First, you lament having to deal with "Bushisms" and "Foxnewsisms." Then, in virtually the same cyber-breath, you claim they have no affect on you.
Nice.
Methinks the problem is in the receptor, not the transmitter.
What's the frequency, Kenneth?!?Methinks the problem is in the receptor, not the transmitter.
Ah,of course. It couldn't possibly be that Dubyah is to the English language what Gacy was to little boys.Methinks the problem is in the receptor, not the transmitter.
Who was lamenting? It was a simple comment.
If you'd stop spinning everything to your liking perhaps you'd understand.
Take a deep cyber-breath and get your head out of your ass.
And you are the one who is confused since you can't make up your damn mind if you are libertarian ornot.
Sure reads like a lamentation.
And still, he's only lost one election...in his entire public career.Ah,of course. It couldn't possibly be that Dubyah is to the English language what Gacy was to little boys.
Misunderstimated again...You should really drop the "Bush is stupid" position, it's not helping your cause.
How many elections did Hitler lose again? Besides, everyone knows that throughout history, Meglomanics aren't soley responsible for their own political rises. Much like Oswald was a patsy, W is a patsy for 'inside forces' that want to use his Presidency to further their Dominiative ends.And still, he's only lost one election...in his entire public career.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
