You write that as though the Commissioner had some discretion to decide on a lesser punishment. The Commissioner could have decided that Amare and Diaw didn't break the rule, but it was quite evident that they did break the rule. Once it was clear that they had broken the rule, the league had no choice but to suspend them, since the rule itself specifically mandates a 1 game suspension for any player who violates the rule.
Anthony is right inasmuch as the rule was ins uted at a time when the league had endured some memorable (probably in a bad way) brawls and needed to do something to clean up its image. But the suspensions in any case arising under the rule aren't discretionary. This wasn't about cleaning up an image -- it was about applying a clear rule to an obvious situation.

Reply With Quote
