Reply With Quote
The Pistons.
He's not in the finals yet ... so stfu about him. This is getting annoying seeing every topic created about it - if you want to hang from his nuts and all, go piss off in the NBA Forum.
The Pistons.
LeBron is teh roolerz of you all!!!
Just about everybody cares about LeBron. He is the reason this will be one of the highest rated Finals ever!
do you work for ABC?
who the gives a about television ratings..
I work for an ABC affiliate, and even I don't care.
Easy answer: Because there's nothing else to talk about?
What Tlong said...
Too bad just about everybody will watch Lebron lose in the highest rated Finals ever!
That is certainly possible. Whatever the outcome we will have some compelling drama to view in the NBA Finals finally!
I just posted this somewhere else, but it applies here too:
In the scandalous unethical society of Corporate America that we live in today, it is my belief that the NBA wants nothing more than to see their newly crowned heir to the throne appear in his first NBA finals against the modern dynasty Spurs juggernaught in a modern day David versus Goliatch epic series. No other player can help rejuvinate the NBA status in these playoffs other than LeBron. Nobody is interested in watch the Spurs methodically going about their business. Sex sells and a LeBron jam is like the next Paris Hilton/Pam Anderson/Kim Kardashian bootleg video, but all of them together. Ratings are down and the NBA is losing money. The execs were busting a nut when they saw him go off for almost 50 becuase their plan was working and their wallets were getting fatter at the same time. Of course they want LeBron in the finals and they're gonna do everything they possibly can to see to it that he gets there. Don't believe me? Just ask D Wade.
You are preaching to the choir brothah.
Get ready for the biggest world wide media love fest since the last Jordan le.
Because EVERYBODY outside of Texas cares about King James. More commercials, more exposure, more jersey sales than all of the Spurs Franchise combined. period.
It would make it that much sweeter when the Spurs beat the Cavs in the Finals (if it happens).
Team play > One man show.
4 wins are between the Spurs and #4. Focus.
Let's see, he's 23. Does anyone REALLY want to have to put up with the press hanging off bronbrons sack for the next 12-15 years ? I sure don't.
I say we put him down early with extreme prejudice.
Even if the Spurs win, *I* wouldn't label them a dynasty.
And not everyone outside of Texas would be rooting for LeBron...
Wow, you have high expectations for being a dynasty. If they win this year, they will be the 4th greatest franchise in league history, and they will have done all of that in only 8 years. You should probably revisit your idea of what cons utes a sports dynasty.
The NBA and coporate America wants to make profits? How dare those evil bas s. What do they think this is, some kind of free market economy?
Evil doers.
Great Woody Allen film! Legendary! Everything you wanted to know about sex! lol lol
I do have high expectations for a dynasty, as everyone should. Not making it back to the Finals and not winning consecutively sticks in my craw. They are a great, great team, just not a dominant one IMO.
It's all semantics, I guess anyone can define the term anyway they like. I'm sure there's someone out there that only includes the Wooden led UCLA team a dynasty because you have to win 10 in a row or something like that. I'd love to see them get two in a row too - this year and next.
Did the Celtics of Bill Russell era and Lakers of Magic Johnson era win consecutive les?? I do believe they're considered to be a dynasty for their respective era.
BTW, I could give 2 sh*ts about Lebron; always have, always will. In his rookie year, I even called in to a sports talk radio show to give my opinion on how the guy looks like he must have taken alot of roids during high school or he was a freak of nature! You rarely see a guy THAT muscle-bound in HS; in other words, he looked abnormal.
Uh, yeah.
And the 80s Lakers made the Finals 7 times.
It is all semantics, though. It's tough to call a team a dynasty, IMO, when they haven't even won their conference in consecutive years, let alone the championship.
pot, meet kettle
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
