Reply With Quote
'05: 16
'06: 18
Mavs: #32
our favorite numbers guru...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playof...=Finalists1-10
'05: 16
'06: 18
Mavs: #32
Three in the top 20 with an order of 1999, 2005 and 2003.
Now isn't a time to start a discussion of ranking the best Spurs teams, but it was an interesting read.
Hope he updates this after the 2007 Finals.
Four more wins, and the battle begins...
Typical. Hollinger is an absolute Spurs homer. None of the Spurs le teams should be in the top 30, and none should rank above the '93 Suns.
I disagree with his formula, it penalizes teams too much when they had an evenly matched rival. The Bulls were often untested. They were great but they never ran into a Shaq and Kobe lead lakers. I think Houston would have given them a of a run the two years Jordan was out as well. But the results are pretty good, I just feel the need to nit pick with the lack of weighting how tough the compe ion was, which of course quintuples the amount of work you would have to do, but still...
Still bitter? Let it go.
Next year when Horry hip checks Nash again, maybe only one of your players will be dumb enough to come off the bench.
I would put the 83 Sixers much higher on that list, and I would add the 95 Rockets into that top 10. I still think the 03 spurs were better than the 99 team.
1. 96 Bulls
2. 95 Rockets
3. 83 Sixers
4. 87 Lakers
5. 01 Lakers
6. 03 Spurs
7. 97 Bulls
8. 92 Bulls
9. 86 Celtics
10 98 Bulls
And Hollinger is a homer?Typical. Hollinger is an absolute Spurs homer. None of the Spurs le teams should be in the top 30, and none should rank above the '93 Suns.
Enjoy your tainted Western Conference crown, as Cleveland humiliates your Spurs.
Still bitter? Let it go.
Next year when Horry hip checks Nash again, maybe only one of your players will be dumb enough to come off the bench.
93 suns were not as good as the 94 suns and neither were as good as the 99 Spurs or the 03 Spurs or the 05 Spurs or the 07 spurs.
The Suns have never been more than fodder for the real champions.
Who's fault is it that the Suns fans keep buying into no-defense coaches?
Just like Utah was supposed to, right?Enjoy your tainted Western Conference crown, as Cleveland humiliates your Spurs.
The only taint around here is you.
This was the Suns year
Guess not.
Who've got access to next ones????????????????????
Having said that, I would put the 83 Sixers much, much higher. That team essentially knew they were winning the championship from day one, and it was never really in doubt.
I never rated the 99 team so high. Maybe that's because I was 8 and didn't appreciate the way we handled all those teams in the playoffs.
Suns homers like you make me
-Mars
You, sir, are a true dumbass. Enjoy watching our celebration in Cleveland after Game 5.
-Mars
The Spurs walked through four really good teams in '99 after going on an incredible run during the season. I remember watching that game where they got killed by Utah before I got on a plane in Orlando. I never dreamed that team could be so good.
I guess it's Cleveland's year.
Guess not.
check the nba forum!!! dang
Andy (Denver): You didn't mention where this Spurs team would rank all-time after a sweep or a 5 game series win.
John Hollinger: (4:43 PM ET ) San Antonio might be able to bust into the top 10 if they win in four or five with a healthy scoring maring. More likely, they'll end up in the 11-14 range.
lol. I can even see BLOOD all over your post.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
