Reply With Quote
Why? The Spurs have been in higher rated finals....have the Cavs?
San Antonio/Cleveland 6.3 rating lowest ever for a NBA Finals Game 1
Sad...
But don't blame Lebron..
Blame the Spurs.
Last edited by Fast Dunk; 06-09-2007 at 12:42 PM.
Why? The Spurs have been in higher rated finals....have the Cavs?
Yeah everytime the Spurs are on the Finals the ratings go down a big deal!
And when the Cavs are on the Finals the ratings go down even further.
Took the Cavs to hit the all time low...
Question:
What makes Cleveland think anyone gives a fnck about it? It has a river that catches on fire? Last I heard...Cleveland was the anus of the USA.
Cleveland must think it's LA or something.
Last edited by whottt; 06-09-2007 at 04:14 AM.
At least San Antonio never lost it's football team.
spurs in the finals = boring city.....
is it any shock that the 2 lowest rated finals series' have had the spurs in them?
Finals ratings since 1976
1976 CELTICS VS SUNS 11.5
1977 BLAZERS VS SIXERS 12.7
1978 BULLETS VS SONICS 9.9
1979 SONICS VS BULLETS 7.2
1980 LAKERS VS SIXERS 8.0
1981 CELTICS VS ROCKETS 6.7
1982 LAKERS VS SIXERS 13.0
1983 SIXERS VS LAKERS 12.3
1984 CELTICS VS LAKERS 12.3
1985 LAKERS VS CELTICS 13.7
1986 CELTICS VS ROCKETS 14.1
1987 LAKERS VS CELTICS 15.9
1988 LAKERS VS PISTONS 15.4
1989 PISTONS VS LAKERS 15.1
1990 PISTONS VS BLAZERS 12.3
1991 BULLS VS LAKERS 15.8
1992 BULLS VS BLAZERS 14.2
1993 BULLS VS SUNS 17.9
1994 ROCKETS VS KNICKS 12.4
1995 ROCKETS VS MAGIC 13.9
1996 BULLS VS SONICS 16.7
1997 BULLS VS JAZZ 16.8
1998 BULLS VS JAZZ 18.7
1999 SPURS VS KNICKS 11.3
2000 LAKERS VS PACERS 11.6
2001 LAKERS VS SIXERS 12.1
2002 LAKERS VS NETS 10.2
2003 SPURS VS NETS 6.5
2004 PISTONS VS LAKERS 11.5
2005 SPURS VS PISTONS 8.2
2006 HEAT VS MAVERICKS 8.5
Yep, Cleveland is dragging us down. If only Detroit had beaten you guys.
And the Nets and the Pistons too?
Fact of the matter put the Cavs with any other team and the ratings will go up quickly!
I'm surprised the 1999 Finals had better ratings despite the lockout, well maybe becuase it has to do something with New York
I'll tell you one thing in regard to all of these Lebron/Jordan comparisons, the Bulls could have played the Antartica Polar Bears and still would have gotten a 13....
Put the Spurs with any other team and the ratings will go up quickly!Fact of the matter put the Cavs with any other team and the ratings will go up quickly!
It's no Cleveland, that's for sure.I'm surprised the 1999 Finals had better ratings despite the lockout, well maybe becuase it has to do something with New York
Yeah, because the rest of the country was just completely on pins and needles anticipating the ratings grabber that could've been Cavs/Jazz, huh?
It showed when the Spurs played the Nets and Pistons
And LeBron is certainly no Jordan....or Dwade even.
He said as he looked up....It showed when the Spurs played the Nets and Pistons
Yes, the ratings were higher than when they played the CavsIt showed when the Spurs played the Nets and Pistons
Ironically enough...the Jazz appear to be the greatest ratings draw in history. At least based on that ratings chart.
=
So Stern wanted Pistons/Jazz.
Got me there.
No arguing my way out of that one.
Maybe if Kingsfan realized that basketball is still played in June, the ratings would be higher. Alas...how are they to know?
Got me there.
No arguing my way out of that one.
jordan and bulls?
you sir are quite original...... and exactly what do the kings have to do with the spurs being boring as to watch?
He just told you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
