Who do you consider "the enemy"? The insurgents or the Iraqi population as a whole?
David Ignatius at the Washington Post relates how CIA lawyers nixed a proposal to sabotage detonators so that the bombs detonated in their own hands.
Now if only the US would actually get credit for these acts of restraint or humanity then there would be some recompense for their forbearance. How often is it argued that the enemy is only responding to American barbarism. If only we had climbed to even higher moral ground! We would conquer by our magnificence.
Now consider the case above in point. Do you suppose the enemy is bowled over, morally impressed at the American reluctance to booby trap IED detonators so that bombmakers might not lose their hands without due process? Does anyone think the Guardian or the BBC will write a tearful letter of gra ude to the Central Intelligence Agency. No doubt they will be tearful, but they will be tears of laughter.
Acts of humanity, where appropriate, must be practiced for their own sake. Anyone who thinks he can win the admiration of the enemy or the left has another thing coming.
Who do you consider "the enemy"? The insurgents or the Iraqi population as a whole?
it was proably too expensive, like body armor
em, blow all them mother ers up
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)