Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34
  1. #1
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trail Blazers
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    28,727
    The NBA WANTS the Spurs to win. It was evident by the lack of a foul called on Bowen at the end of the game. They are building the Spurs up so that the Portland Trail Blazers can end their dynasty next season in the Western Conference Finals. GuaranSheed.

  2. #2
    Believe. zrinkill's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    400
    Whatever gets you through your very very long offseason .....

  3. #3
    Believe. manubili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    547
    Sure, nba loves to have lousy TV ratings.

  4. #4
    Spurs Homer. D'oh! MadDog73's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,610
    Should you still use the "guaransheed" line?

    I think the Pistons trademarked it.

  5. #5
    Forum Official Personal Life Coach BacktoBasics's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    11,318
    The fact that there was no call favored the Cavs. Lebron had a better chance of getting the jumper than the free throws in.

    I stated in another thread that I think it was a foul but I also think the Refs let it go to give James an opportunity to hit the jumper. If the ref blows the wistle right when Bowen touches him its not in the act of shooting. The ref held back because it wasn't going to affect James getting the shot off and its good to see the officials attempting to let the game be decided by the players not the zebras.

    James said in the post game that it was incidental contact and it didn't affect his shot. He was given the opportunity to tie the game and he didn't. I think it was a good no call.

  6. #6
    Veteran degenerate_gambler's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    2,327
    The NBA WANTS the Spurs to win. It was evident by the lack of a foul called on Bowen at the end of the game. They are building the Spurs up so that the Portland Trail Blazers can end their dynasty next season in the Western Conference Finals. GuaranSheed.

    Please..

    No way in your mediocre club makes the playoffs next year.

  7. #7
    Believe. The_Worlds_finest's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,506
    portland getting to the playoffs alone would be a conspriacy!

  8. #8
    Roll The Dice Hook Dem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    6,877
    The NBA WANTS the Spurs to win. It was evident by the lack of a foul called on Bowen at the end of the game. They are building the Spurs up so that the Portland Trail Blazers can end their dynasty next season in the Western Conference Finals. GuaranSheed.
    Why are you even here???? Seriously.....your "act" is getting old!

  9. #9
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    The NBA WANTS the Spurs to win. It was evident by the lack of a foul called on Bowen at the end of the game. They are building the Spurs up so that the Portland Trail Blazers can end their dynasty next season in the Western Conference Finals. GuaranSheed.
    If my team had just securing the right to draft Greg Oden, I wouldn't be ing about conspiracy theories.

    Your WCF aspirations for the Blazers are ambitious, but don't get ahead of yourself too soon. Your team's time will come - just not next year.

  10. #10
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trail Blazers
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    28,727
    Why are you even here???? Seriously.....your "act" is getting old!
    Love your pic!

  11. #11
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trail Blazers
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    28,727
    The fact that there was no call favored the Cavs. Lebron had a better chance of getting the jumper than the free throws in.

    I stated in another thread that I think it was a foul but I also think the Refs let it go to give James an opportunity to hit the jumper. If the ref blows the wistle right when Bowen touches him its not in the act of shooting. The ref held back because it wasn't going to affect James getting the shot off and its good to see the officials attempting to let the game be decided by the players not the zebras.

    James said in the post game that it was incidental contact and it didn't affect his shot. He was given the opportunity to tie the game and he didn't. I think it was a good no call.
    It was in the act of shooting. It would have been an "and one" or three shots.

  12. #12
    Believe. zrinkill's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    400
    It was in the act of shooting. It would have been an "and one" or three shots.
    No it was not .....

    the 's are coming out of the woodwork this morning

  13. #13
    Believe. The_Worlds_finest's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,506
    yeah it was in the act of shooting, lebron is so bad ass he redefines the act of shooting from being in the act of shooting to dribble then shooting. My bro and I tivo'ed back to the foul sure bowen obviously fouled him but it was not even close to the act of shooting. LeNike had his chances and blew them.

  14. #14
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    If they blow the whistle and lebron hits that three, they wave it off. TLongII has a post saying, "This is a leaguewide conspiracy"...

  15. #15
    New Fang. . . O-Factor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,276
    The NBA WANTS the Spurs to win. It was evident by the lack of a foul called on Bowen at the end of the game. They are building the Spurs up so that the Portland Trail Blazers can end their dynasty next season in the Western Conference Finals. GuaranSheed.
    What? You think Oden is going to get you, at the least, 4 championships???? Tim Duncan is going to make him his . Its not even going to be funny.l That, along with the fact that Oden doesn't have much offensive skill, just means he will be another Montumbo

  16. #16
    Veteran Creation88's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    2,084
    i'm sorry but you have to be a ing idiot to believe that Stern wants the SPURS to win a Championship. i'm sure he's taking a rusty razorblade to his wrist right now due to the ratings.

  17. #17
    New Fang. . . O-Factor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,276
    It was in the act of shooting. It would have been an "and one" or three shots.
    It was NOT in the act of shooting. It was a foul, on the floor. LB should of shot 2. But it was not in the act of shooting. I saw many former players/ESPN analysts say so aswell. Guess you don't know much about basketball.

  18. #18
    themvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    2,254
    Off-topic:

    I don't want to start a new thread, so I'll ask here:
    Can any of you compare 90's defense to defense that Spurs or Pistons have been playing for last 5-6 years?

  19. #19
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    28,298
    Dammit! Tlong found us out!


  20. #20
    Forum Official Personal Life Coach BacktoBasics's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    11,318
    It was in the act of shooting. It would have been an "and one" or three shots.
    He wasn't initially fouled in the act of shooting if the wistle was going to blow it should have right when he touched him. Which would have been two shot had he gotten it off or an on the floor foul. He moved away from the contact and the refs gave him a chance to get the tie. That no called favored the Cavs in every way. Thats why James was a man about it in the postgame.

  21. #21
    New Fang. . . O-Factor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,276
    Off-topic:

    I don't want to start a new thread, so I'll ask here:
    Can any of you compare 90's defense to defense that Spurs or Pistons have been playing for last 5-6 years?
    You mean defense before the NBA instated new rules to allow for more scoring, less contact and less defense???? Thus resulting in a new brand of basketball where whiny premadonnas like Amare are everywhere now.

  22. #22
    Steele Curtain cherylsteele's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    3,315
    It was in the act of shooting. It would have been an "and one" or three shots.
    Lebron even said wasn't a foul...get over it.

    They had plenty of other chances so get over it.

  23. #23
    Saytowns Fawtbox King lebomb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    10,747
    It was in the act of shooting. It would have been an "and one" or three shots.

    You dumbass......you can only have an "and one" if the shot falls in.......even if they would have called it.....Bron BRICKED the shot.

  24. #24
    Steele Curtain cherylsteele's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    3,315
    LB should of shot 2.
    Why? the spurs had a foul to give....it would have been Cavs ball on the side.

  25. #25
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trail Blazers
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    28,727
    It's called "continuation" people!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •