Just heard from a guy who knows stuff that the Suns are closing in on moving Sean Marks to Utah for Boozer and their choice of Ronnie Brewer or Paul Millsap. Time for big discussions on this trade rumor.
Electric Boogaloo was the 2nd Breakin' movie.
And shut up.
Your thread le is wrong. It was Breakin 2 Electric Boogaloo. Therefore you should have le your 2nd ridiculous and assanine thread Electric Boogaloo.
hey if you don't like it then don't click it.
I apologize, I just wanted to make sure that Suns fans had enough threads to discuss their stupid trade rumors because evidently 10 wasn't enough.
Unlike you, Sunfan kept his ramblings confined to two or three threads, all on topic.
Yours is just a silly attempt from a desperate attention .
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72195
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72349
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72122
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72115
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72205
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72220
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72282
Are you pissed there are only four mavtrade threads on the front page?
Thread 1: Suns fan - posted: 6-22-07
Thread 2: Suns fan - posted: 6-25-07
Thread 3: Suns fan - posted: 6-21-07
Thread 4: SPURS fan
Thread 5: Suns fan - posted: 6-22-07
Thread 6: SPURS fan
Thread 7: PISTONS fan
So, essentually, you're getting your panties in a bunch because Sunfan started four threads in one week on two or three topics?
OK...
Shall a look up all of MavFan's ramblings?
You, in one fell - and failed - swoop to poke fun at Sunfan, managed to, in one afternoon, mind you, create three threads on absolute BS to Sunfan's four in one week.
Congratulations, troll...
Do whatever the you want. If a Mavfan is throwing out bull like "james jones and last first round picks to move into the top 10" then they deserve people to on them.
I'm glad Suns fans restrain themselves from talking trade rumors in threads started by a non-Sunfan.
if it's so failed why do you continue responding?
Congratulations, bag...
But not by me. You see, in this thread, you took exception to any fan other than Mavs fans who dumped on Mavfan stupidity.
My, my... congratulations, hypocrite.
get back to me when you actually read that thread.
And it should be done in that thread.
yeah true. honestly I didn't think these threads would last this long anyways, I figured they'd get deleted almost immediately.
LMAO! You clearly wanted no part of a non-Mavfan telling Mavs fans anything that could burst their bubble. True, you were ready and willing to call him out for his ignorance, but you took exception to me pointing something out that could very well have ended such an expectation/declaration.
wrong again. take a third trip into that thread.
Why should I do that when the thread does it for me?
if you put a detailed account of that entire thread in here with each response and rebuttal quoted and pasted in here, then maybe i'll get around to showing you where your head went up your ass. thanx.
(wouldn't it be hilarious if he did it?)
Mighty big talk. Care to prove it?
All one has to do is skim through that linked thread to notice you and Ponky going to town on anything other suns fans and I said on the topic.
If expecting the Mavs to remain completely healthy, then win out from mid-Feb on is a position that is immune from criticsm from opposing fan bases, then most certainly the posting of a rumor here and there on corresponding threads can be looked past.
You simply have issues with Sunfan. Which is why you felt it necessary to give the entire fanbase a cute little moniker...
You're really grasping at straws here.
And the circle continues...
I think opposing fanbases criticizing such a ridiculous notion is super. I don't think opposing fanbases who are steeped in nothing but ridiculous notions criticizing one non-fan's ridiculous notion is all that super.
I can't take credit for that. Someone greater than I came up with it.
OOOOOH... the hostility...
Anyways... my initial post to his claim that the Mavs would win out and win the le from Mid-February on...
If that's not pertinent to the discussion, then forgive me. It's just, it seems every year some team's "star" gets injured. In fact, wasn't 2002-03 that Dirk got injured in the Conference Finals vs. the Spurs? Oh, and in the series before that, wasn't it the Mavs playing the Kings when Webber blew his knee out?
Come on... you took exception then because I was a Suns fan, because it certainly wasn't the tone, nor the message. It was an innocent comment, that you tried to reverse upon me as if I was the one who proclaimed the Suns would win every game from there on out.
Your response...
Mine to yours...
Mine to another poster...
Yours to mine...
I especially liked this one. Making up quotes and all while responding to me. Nobody I knew ever said anything like, "if we had a healthy amare and joe johnson and raja bell and kurt thomas and a healthy Jake Voskuhl then we'd have TWO LES MOTHER ER!!!" I certainly never did.
Part of mine to yours...
And another...
The problem was you thought I was bashing the Mavs, when I said for the entire season that they were on the same rung as San Antonio and Phoenix. You went loco when all I did was objectively and calmly express that nothing is a given, because one injury can upend everything. You agreed with my stance, but felt the need to criticize me for making it, as if that made any sense.
Since you happened to agree with my point, but felt the need to call me out, what other explanation is there except that you took exception to the poster, not the post? I figure, since I didn't do jack in that thread to warrent a call out, that my fandom was what you had such a disdain for.
If I'm wrong, then explain.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)