Sorry if this has already been posted but with all this money saving we're doing we can look like what it would be like to have Isaiah instead of RC!
From ESPN
Knicks top list of teams to pay luxury tax
By Marc Stein
ESPN.com
(Archive)
Updated: July 13, 2007, 6:21 PM ET
Comment
The New York Knicks can't be feeling very lucky on this Friday The Thirteenth.
Show Me The Money
Big spending doesn't always pay off. Just ask the New York Knicks. The Knicks, who missed the playoffs last season with a 33-49 mark, were strapped with a $45 million luxury-tax bill Friday. That means New York owes almost $40 million more than the second-highest paying team in the Mavs.
Luxury-Taxed Teams Team Money Owed
1. Knicks $45,142,002
2. Mavs $7,204,968
3. Nuggets $2,022,418
4. T-Wolves $998,536
5. Spurs $196,082
By the end of this business day, you see, each of the NBA's five luxury-tax-paying teams from last season will have received an official invoice from the league stating the "net" amount they must remit.
In the Knicks' case?
The payment due by July 25, according to a league memo distributed this week to all 30 teams: $45 million and change.
That's $45-plus million for a team that went 33-49 and missed the playoffs for a third successive season. It was team president Isiah Thomas' first season as Knicks coach, following a 23-59 nightmare under Larry Brown, with New York going 4-14 to slip out of playoff contention after Thomas received a contract extension on March 12.
The next closest tax bill is the Dallas Mavericks' $7.2 million.
Teams that carried a payroll higher than $65.42 million for the 2006-07 season are required to pay a dollar-for-dollar tax on every dollar over that threshold. The following five teams are required to pay as follows:
The 25 non-tax-paying teams, meanwhile, will each receive 1/30 of the ulative tax amount, which computes to nearly $1.9 million per team.
Marc Stein is the senior NBA writer for ESPN.com. To e-mail him, click here.
The Knicks can afford to pay $45 million in lux tax and hand out lousy contracts. When you're in that media market, and your ownership has that kind of deep pockets, what incentive is there to spend prudently and get under the cap? It ultimately makes no difference.
It's not so much a matter of them overpaying as it is who they're overpaying.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote