Reply With Quote
That was gross
scroll down to look at the before and after animation of what they did to their photo of Faith Hill for their mag cover.
We are WAY beyond the airbrushing days.
That was gross
that's how you turn a 40 year old with 3 kids into a 24 year old vix.
i'd hit both.
How is that gross? It's life man. It's not if in the like the original pic she looked horrible...? She just looked her age I assume. I don't know how old Faith is.
But not gross.
The before picture was far from a bad picture, but looked like a freak show when animated with the retouched picture.
She is like 40ish I think. She looks great in the first photo, very real IMHO.
She's hot no matter what picture
so what's new?
She looked great inthe 1st photo.
She;s over 40, has kids, adn afulltime career - thats rtough, and she looks spectacular.
in the "after" photo they gave her one of those deathly thin arms. ewwwwwwwwww.
She didn't look bad in the first photo.
Did you notice her arm lost weight too.
Must suck to be a very good looking, natural woman asked to be on the cover of a magazine, only to have your photo retouched by some ugly geek who works in Copy.
...and her back fat folding over her dress. She is still hot for her age.
Looks like she feeds on the hopes and dreams of small children while they sleep.
more glamour photoshopping
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiYCWdzm404
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XCYgrKFWC4
Last edited by PixelPusher; 07-18-2007 at 05:24 PM.
Faith looks a lot older...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
