You're right, I didn't assume anything about Al Sharpton with relationship to this story. Why would I? There's no racial element to the story, it's dog fighting.
Not quite the stance many of you probably assumed he would take.
You're right, I didn't assume anything about Al Sharpton with relationship to this story. Why would I? There's no racial element to the story, it's dog fighting.
Not exactly a bold stance either, but at least it's something.
Oh c'mon, when you saw the le to the thread, you probably assumed Al Sharpton said something stupid in defense of Michael Vick. I know I did when I saw the headline.
Oh yeah, you're right; when I saw the le of the thread, I did think he probably came out in Vick's corner.
But, on further reflection, there's no white person to demonize here and, who knows, maybe Sharpton is a dog lover. God knows there are plenty of people who put their pets above even their pet political causes.
This more than anything else, further proves how useless and obscure Sharpton/et al have become.
Why would they even feel a need to make a comment, nonetheless make a written statement to the stated individuals?
Convinced of one's own greatness. So much so, you stick your nose in things that have absolutely nothing to do with race, but just so your name can be attached to the issue in some fashion.
De able.
I don't know. Sharpton never really has respected fellow members of his race, or else he wouldn't keep them beholden to needing him. Maybe he just likes dogs better than members of his own race?
I think it's a good thing for Al (or anyone with a public voice) to call out the heartless bas s that would treat animals the way Vick does.
I agree. Too bad he only speaks of white on black crime and crime against animals, and doesn't speak of black on black crime or black on white crime.
I agree. But, I wonder why, when it involves humans, he only calls out the alleged criminals who are white and whose alleged victims are black?
I heard this announcement about an hour ago, so I looked it up:
Nike suspends release of Vick line
Another interesting link:
Shoe Drops: Nike Halts Vick Sneaker Release
Note on page two:
Stribling said that Coca-Cola was trying to determine who owned the site so the logos could be stripped.
Fair point, but be realistic. Why did he/they feel a need to comment at all?
I also wonder why the national media only chooses to cover tragedies that happen to white women? When was the last time that a woman of color got the same media attention when they went missing that white women get?I agree. But, I wonder why, when it involves humans, he only calls out the alleged criminals who are white and whose alleged victims are black?
Good question for the media.
are you two like long lost twins or something? or did you hear the same talking point on the laura ingraham show?
Why distract from the issue? Al is right.
I'm not so sure. With his track record of speaking out against others, makes me think Vicks is innocent.
until proven guilty?
Legally, yes. My understanding is they have no solid evidence anyway. On his property that is taken care of by family?
I think he is guilty, but stranger things have happened. I'm not seeing the evidence first hand.
If the dog does not bite, you must not smite.
Al Sharpton is a key part of the issue. He cosponsored the letter.
As for the similar response, it is plain as day that Sharpton is a racist pig. Those were my own thoughts, not repeating others. Just forming an opinion from past knowledge of a racists actions.
Dog fighting is very cruel.
Al Sharpton has supported other PETA initiatives.
Al Sharpton and PETA also stood up against Kentucky Fried Chicken and it's cruelty to animals.
Un ingbelieveable. Can't believe he actually took a semi-psuedo-sorta-kinda-almost strong stance. I'm proud of him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)