Reply With Quote
this has already been discussed.....and yes it has been a long summer
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74395
No just teasing you! Calm down trollers...
This summer is way too long
this has already been discussed.....and yes it has been a long summer
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74395
manu
"calm down trollers"
if tony has a bad game the spurs usually lose
if manu has a bad game sometimes they lose
they both need to be on in order to win a le
right now,maybe tony has a little edge over Manu,but on 4rd quarters manu puts on the Superman suit and gets the job done.
BTW,I don´t think TP will do better tham the 2005 long haired Manu.That´s gonna be tough to ac plish,and not just for scouring,I´m talking about leadership and taughness to carry the team all the way in the playoffs.
men ! i was teasing you with this old and booooring debate... stop being stupid and enjoy our Big 3 the way it is...
Dufus.
Unless you are playing the Cavs, obviously.
Easy, vato. This is all your fault. You created this stupid thread and other stupid beings (like me) read it.
Scola
I'm for Manu.
Speaking of Manu, I see that he's getting in a little tennis now
Manu, the other is just Eva's husband
I assume that being champs explodes all the creativity around, right?
MANU GINOBILI
I think.
Okay, now who's going to take the hooks out of all these mouths?
In the first 3 quarters Tony, but in 4 quarter Manu all the way, if you tell me that pick one of them for a game, I pick Manu.
In the picture of above, manu play tennis, soccer and paddle very well, ovbiusly was the best on basketball, but the worst in Jokey.
That is a tough one, they are both so critical to your team.
I would have to say right now in 2007, I would go with Parker. His FG % and ability to break down defenses at will with his quickness is something else. And I am a big fan of Ginobili's game (other than flopping) he is probably more "clutch" in big situations than Parker....but Parker put up a monster season last year and is the most underrated PG in the NBA without a doubt.
I was very impressed with Parker this past post season. I wanted him traded last year cause he always folded in the playoffs. So far, I'd have to say the long haired Manu was better.
Tony Parker by a landslide.
Man-ny Gin-arker.
I Have a couple of Links
MANU 1,45 POINTS PER SHOT (10º IN THE NBA WITH STEVE NASH)
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statis...g=none&pos=all
TONY 1,3 POINTS PER SHOT (6º BETWEEN THE PG)
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statis...ntype=2&pos=pg
MANU 20º IN ADJUSTED FG% WITH 0.539 AND TONY 28º WITH 0.529
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statis...type=2&pos=all
TONY 23º IN FGA WITH 1089 AND MANU 73º WITH 854
ONLY 2 PLAYEES SCORED MORE POINTS THAN MANU WITH LESS SHOTS (MAGGETTE AND DWIGHT HOWARD) AND 2 SCORED MORE THAN TONY TOO (KEVIN MARTIN AND SOME PLAYER CALLED TIM DUNCAN)
Both are great
Damn Waly,those are real interesting numbers you jut got there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
