The Sept 11th ISI/D.C. Money Wire Transfer Connection

[Nbadan]

Following the Sept 11th money....

In the weeks leading to Sept 11th, Mahmmud Ahmed (a top ISI Official) ordered the transfer of funds from Pakistani banks to Venice Florida, where it was picked up and distributed by Mohammed Atta to the 9/11 hijackers via money orders throughout the United States to sponsor the attacks.

This do entary presents the many-faceted events that led up to, and then scrutinizes, the 9/11 commission hearings. Massive injustices and mis-representations are brought to light and "exposed" by respected members of the mainstream American media, and from the families themselves in the narrative of events that shaped most greatly our world today:

"9/11: Press for Truth"

The families present their 2 1/2 year struggle to create an investigation and inquiry into the events of 9/11 -- which was at first heavily resisted and even explicity prohibited by the President and Vice-President. For an example of contrast in funding; the internal disruption of a Clinton-Lewinsky "sex scandal" the event was awarded a budget of 100 million dollars in total. Initially the 9/11 Comission was only allotted 3 million dollars and their time-limit was severely cut beyond the expectations of those who brought it into existence.

[BIG IRISH]

Dan, When are you going to let this rest?

You have been bird-dogging this for years, don't you get it? Nobody cares

[Wild Cobra]

Dan, When are you going to let this rest?

You have been bird-dogging this for years, don't you get it? Nobody cares

Dan, do like other people do when they want to fund something. Start a collection! Find like minded people who will donate to the cause.

[boutons_]

The story of the WH inaction and dereliction of duty on national security, terrorism, AQ, and the attack warnings between 20 Jan and 11 Sep remains untold, and the WH has succeeded and is succeeding in keeping that story completely untold. I'm sure much of head's extreme secrecy, which was stepped up after 9/11, including refusing to approve the 9/11 commission, is intended to hide the WH, esp head's and Condi's, culpability.

That story definitely needs to be told. And it will be told.

In shock and giving the WH the benefit of the doubt in a moment of national trauma, "The American People" weren't ready to hear how the WH's inattention enabled 9/11. But with the ever-widening and deepening disapproval and lack trust in dubya and heads, people will look back and see that 9/11 was not inevitable.

How 9/11 has been ruthlessly exploited with WH lies to promote Repug/neo- /AEI/PNAC objectives, including the bull Iraq oil-grab war shows that the WH welcomed 9/11 as much if not more than it mourned 9/11.

I don't think the WH explicitly caused 9/11, but their inaction certainly enabled it. The biggest lie defending the WH is that there was NOTHING that could have been done to prevent or reduce the chanes of success for 9/11, but the 9/11 Commission, even hog-tied by the WH, pointed a long list of actons NOT taken by the WH.

Of course, the other big lie, and indicator of WH culability, is the WH defenders sliming Clinton for exclusive, total responsiblity for AQ/WTC, while totally deflecting all questions about dubya/ head/Condi in in Jan-Sep 2001 period.

The simplest question is the most blantant and accusatory: why did the WH refuse to approve the 9/11 Commission, then delayed it, then refused to co-operate fully?

[xrayzebra]

The story of the WH inaction and dereliction of duty on national security, terrorism, AQ, and the attack warnings between 20 Jan and 11 Sep remains untold, and the WH has succeeded and is succeeding in keeping that story completely untold. I'm sure much of head's extreme secrecy, that was stepped up after 9/11, including refusing to approve the 9/11 commission is intended to hide the WH, esp head's and Condi's, culpability.

That story definitely needs to be told. And it will be told.

In shock and giving the WH the benefit of the doubt in a moment of national trauma, "The American People" weren't ready to hear how the WH's inattention enabled 9/11. But with the ever-widening and deepening disapproval and lack trust in dubya and heads, people will look back and see that 9/11 was not inevitable.

How 9/11 has been ruthlessly exploited with WH lies to promote Repug/neo- /AEI/PNAC objectives, including the bull Iraq oil-grab war shows that the WH welcomed 9/11 as much if not more than it mourned 9/11.

I don't think the WH explicitly caused 9/11, but their inaction certainly enabled it. The biggest lie is that there was NOTHING that could have been done to prevent or reduce the chanes of success for 9/11, but the 9/11 Commission, even hog-tied by the WH, pointed a long list of actons NOT taken by the WH.

The simplest question is the most blantant and accusatory: why did the WH refuse to approve the 9/11 Commission, then delayed it, then refused to co-operate fully?

Obviously "The story of the (Clintons) WH inaction and dereliction of duty on national security, terrorism, AQ, and the attack warnings between 20 Jan (1993) and (Jan 2001) remains untold, and the WH has succeeded and is succeeding in keeping that story completely untold."

Now boutons that reads more like the truth than your
version.

Of course you really don't want to go there, do you?

[BIG IRISH]

Boutons and Ray are both right, why can't we get the WHOLE TRUTH

both need to come clean

[Wild Cobra]

Obviously "The story of the (Clintons) WH inaction and dereliction of duty on national security, terrorism, AQ, and the attack warnings between 20 Jan (1993) and (Jan 2001) remains untold, and the WH has succeeded and is succeeding in keeping that story completely untold."

Now boutons that reads more like the truth than your
version.

Of course you really don't want to go there, do you?

I really don't understand how the Bush haters can be so stupid about that point. President Clinton had all this time and intelligence and did nothing. With such inaction, why should president Bush believe it was a priority?

[boutons_]

"President Clinton had all this time and intelligence and did nothing"

Clinton had 1000+ witch-hunting/harassing subpoenas from a Repug Congress.

Clinton had to fight off a Mellon-Scaife/FLAG lawsuit.

Clinton did not have the "flashing red lights" and attack warning of 2001 that dubya/ head/Condi ignored.

When Clinton did take action against AQ (bombing Afghanistan and Sudan), he was accused by the Repugs of trying to distract from his Repug-fomented troubles.

dubya suckers, please fill in the list of anti-AQ actions that dubya and head did from 20 Jan 2001 to 11 Sep 2001:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

etc.

During Jan-Sep 2001 period, how many subpoenas were served on the WH by Congress?

Although dubya, Macho Man!, said in the 2000 campaign that action must be taken against who was repsonsible for the Cole attack, when in Feb 2001 it was confirmed that AQ had planned the Cole attack, dubya did nothing and had nothing planned against AQ. As always with dubya and his "vows", "dead or alive", "with us or agains us", etc, he talks big, but either does nothing, or s up what he does.

dubya and head are walking, talking US National Security disasters and fatal threats to the US military.

[xrayzebra]

"President Clinton had all this time and intelligence and did nothing"

Clinton had 1000+ witch-hunting/harassing subpoenas from a Repug Congress.

Clinton had to fight off a Mellon-Scaife/FLAG lawsuit.

Clinton did not have the "flashing red lights" and attack warning of 2001 that dubya/ head/Condi ignored.

When Clinton did take action against AQ (bombing Afghanistan and Sudan), he was accused by the Repugs of trying to distract from his Repug-fomented troubles.

dubya suckers, please fill in the list of anti-AQ actions that dubya and head did from 20 Jan 2001 to 11 Sep 2001:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

etc.

During Jan-Sep 2001 period, how many subpoenas were served on the WH by Congress?

Although dubya, Macho Man!, said in the 2000 campaign that action must be taken against who was repsonsible for the Cole attack, when in Feb 2001 it was confirmed that AQ had planned the Cole attack, dubya did nothing and had nothing planned against AQ. As always with dubya and hi "vows", "dead or alive", "with us or agains us", etc, he talks big, but either does nothing, or s up what he does.

Boutons, do you remember a little thing just prior to
the 9/11 attack. Like the electrion and Florida in which
the dimm-o-craps tried every trick in the book to
steal an election. I don't suppose that took up much
time from Bush, did it. They really didn't get to have
a transition period like normally occurs. And then when
they did get in the WH they had a mess to clean up
because all of Clintons Children destroyed most of the
furniture and office equipment. Which the press thought
was so damn funny. Remember all the stories about
the missing keys on the keyboards? Naw, thought not.

And the blocked appointments by the dimms. Which
still persist to this day. You have a short memory son.