So what this guy is saying is that the quality of your FO factors in your greatness, as well as the strength of your opposition.
He left Wilt out because he didn't have a lot of postseason success, but how much of that was because Russell was really better than Wilt, and how much is it because the Celtics > 6ers, Lakers?
Now even IF Russell > Wilt, but what if Russell is #1 of all time, and Wilt is #2? That means that Russell will beat Wilt in all head to heads, leaving Wilt with limited post-season success, thus leading to Wilt being excluded from the list despite being #2.
Vs. a guy like Shaq, who didn't get any success until the previous era's dominant big men were old and has declined (Hakeem DRob, Ewing) did he start to dominate, but does that make him a more dominant player than WIlt?

Reply With Quote
