Is a future Hall of Famer.
Just kidding.
He did well against a third string Lions D.
Quinn looked ing awesome and I don't really give a rat's ass who he was playing against. He looked calm, cool, and collected and he showd the poise of a veteran quarterback.
I'm still pissed that we (Cowboys) passed on him and I think that we'll live to regret it.
Come on, man. Matt Moore looked great against the reigning Superbowl Champions' 3rd string D. Maybe Moore is the next Joe Montana!!
This is way to early to even know if Quinn will be a bust or not.
...my grandma can pass for 100 yards against the Lions defense.
Your grandma should play for the Browns or Raiders.
She'd make a lot of money.
How did Matt Moore look tonight??
Anyway, remember that Quinn wasn't playing with the 1rst team.
He looked good.
Moore looked decent, but nothing great. Didn't get as much time.
Moore didn't play with the 1st team either, and looked better than Quinn against the people who won't make the champion's roster. Quinn looked good against the people who won't make the Lion's roster. The point is that either performance shows that either QB may be sufficient as the 3rd QB at this point. Quinn has to do much more against much better comp before he's even beginning to prove anything.
You gotta be ting me!!!!
Quinn making a case for 3rd stringer???
Come on, man.
Do you know anything at all??
Crennell can't decide who to go with, at all. He's was waiting on Quinn to end his hold out to evaluate Anderson, Frye, and Quinn. Dorsey's not even in the picture. Quinn's going to be the starter for that team. If you don't understand that, then you just can't be helped.
Jesus man, you aren't paying attention. I didn't say Quinn is only going to be the 3rd string QB, I said his performance today only shows that he is qualified to be the 3rd QB. AT THIS POINT he hasn't shown anything more than that. Both of the other guys have had good games and ty games against much better compe ion, so Quinn is going to have to put up more good performances against better compe ion before he wins that spot. If you think he's automatically the starting QB after this one game against scrubs, then you're football illiterate. I've probably forgotten more than you'll ever know about the game, so try to keep up.
Another thing, playing QB in the NFL is very difficult, but the success a QB has is almost always directly related to a few things. Those things are 1) The success of the running game 2) The success of the O Line to run block and pass protect 3) The success of the defense to stop the run and 4) The success of the defense to limit the opponents points.
If those things are solid, the QB can play the game and make plays within the offense without having to press. He can manage the game and make plays to win.
At this point the Browns might not have one of those things.
He was playing with scrubs too!!!!!
As to you forgetting more than I'll ever know, yea right.
If you want me to agree to make you feel better, than okay.
Feel better?
Did the Cardinals have any of these things last year?
How was Matt Linehart?
Terrible.
Season Team GP Rating Att Comp Pct Yds TD INT Att Yds TD
12 74.0 377 214 56.8 2547 11 12 22 49 2
Then I guess he's just a horrible quarterback.
Kurt Warner should be given the starters job back.
Linehart did nothing last year.
You're full of . He kept them competing for most of the games. He made rookie mistakes but he also showed why he deserved to be the starter over Kurt Warner, who happens to be a Super Bowl quarterback.
Matt Leinart has tools, but as long as his team doesn't have the 4 things I listed he's going to be a losing QB. He has arguable the best receivers in football, but can't get them the ball because his OL sucks. You think that's bad, just wait to see what happens to Quinn once he goes against 1st stringers with the team he has. His performance against scrubs bought him the opportunity to get reps with the 1st team in the preseason, but let's see how he does.
You've been owned in two threads. Quinn hasn't proven anything yet and you know it.
Matt Leinart is already good. He's going to be a very good quarterback in the league for years to come. He was good last year, regardless of the 4 things you listed. Vince Young was good last year regardless of the problems with the Oline. Point being, they lived up to the hype. And, I beleive that Quinn will too.
Regardless against who he was playing against, he played much better than either Anderson or Frye.
if Matt Leinart will have rouble with the O line he's got, I can only imagine whats going to happen to JaMarcus with that line
As a long time Browns fan, I've seen Eric Zeier before. Brady ain't even Eric Zeier yet.
And, this wasn't even the regular Lion's defense. Your grandma could probably throw 250 yards against those third and fourth stringers.
Still, Quinn didn't have control who he played against, and he looked poised and threw good balls for the most part. He still sucks.
Leinart had a horrible year considering the weapons at his disposal on that team. He had Edge as the running back, Fitzgerald and Boldin as WR. He should have been putting up all pro numbers with those weapons but he didn't come close. Why? Because that team doesn't have what I was talking about.
The only reason Vince Young had a decent year is because of his ability to run and make people miss. He didn't have a big season with his arm, and a big reason is because he had no O Line.
I agree.
It was a good experience for him, but wake me when he does well against a starting pre-season defense and we'll re-visit.
Atleast he didn't look like against the 3rd team
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
