In my mind , there is third option for crisis of middle east , it's change Mullas' Regim in Iran by support Iranian people and their resistance, more than %90 of iranian people hate this regime and opposite them and want to change them, but this regime is on power just with execution , torture , public hanging and press the people with anyway that they can, in iran you can wear or eat or ... anything that you want
This regim export their crisis from Iran to all of the world with terror.
so I choose this group because you believe democrasi and freedom too
Preferable Option for Iran Is a Popular Revolution
In an article the Washington Times on Sep. 5, highlighted the best solution for Iran to confront atomic threat by its regime is a popular revolt.
The article states: “Washington seemingly has three main options for stopping Tehran’s efforts:
1) hoping a popular revolution would drive the current regime from power before it develops atomic weapons;
2) persuading Europe and Japan to deny credit to the Iranian government and support sustained economic sanctions against the government;
or
3) using military force to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities and/or remove the current regime from power.”
”There are huge problems with each of these alternatives. For U.S. policy-makers, the preferable alternative would be a popular revolution, in which the Iranians overthrew a despotic regime. But for that regime change to actually serve larger U.S. geopolitical interests, it has to take place before Iran develops a nuclear weapon… To be sure, there is plenty of popular dissatisfaction with the regime. Public-opinion polls and random, discreet interviews with Iranians on the street conducted suggest that most of them want to be rid of the clerical dictatorship. Whether this can be translated into regime change before Iran obtains an A-bomb is anyone’s guess.
As for sanctions and economic pressure, they too have a role to play in pressuring the regime to change its policies. But international economic sanctions have a spotty record in this regard, and even if they do manage to force the regime to change its policies, how do we determine whether it stopped Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons?”
MORE
best regards
At least you're making some sense here. Too many people don't.
I think that is one major reason why we resist temptation in taking Iran's toys away by force. Iran used to be so modern for it's time, during most of the 70's. Look at them now. The people want the good days back.
You think the number one reason we're not taking Iran's toys away by force is hope of a popular revolution?
No, the number one reason we're not taking them away by force is because WE CAN'T.
You are the idiot. I said "one major reason." You are a fool to put words in my mouth.
Can you read?
Keep coming up with useless discourse, and I will place you on IGNORE like I have a few others. You have not yet contributed in any meaningful way that I've seen recently.
You appear to be just another master-baiter
I wonder how many other people have you on IGNORE?
Feel free to put me on ignore. Am I supposed to straighten up at your "threats?"
Classic.
Its not my fault you're a twit dude.
Feel free to put me on ignore. Am I supposed to straighten up at your "threats?"
Classic.
Its not my fault you're a twit dude.
watch it he may do it.... put you on ignore.
don't do it man; it ain't worth it dude. step away from the "ignore" button.
It's time to invade and speed up the process, correct?
The preferrable option for Iraq would have been a popular revolution too, but we all saw how that worked out....
LOL... Sure it's worth it. When all one has to offer is insults with no material of value to the thread...
Cuts down what there is to read!
Having Chump and Boutons on IGNORE had dramatically reduced the length of these threads.
why do you hate free speech and wish death on our troops?
WC, you aren't the first poster to give up after being shown you aren't as smart as you thought you were. It's more fun to insult you without hearing you whine about me -- which you just did -- so cut it out and really ignore me, stupid.
still pissed off about clinton military cuts that cost him his job in the field of antennas.
if you're still interested in antiquated devices, why don't you build a cotton gin.
LOL quite the opposite. Just shows how dumb you are for assuming such.
There you go, showing your ignorant assumptions again. My job field was phased out during the five year plan under president Bush (41). Remember the DD-214 I scanned? Someone made the idiotic remark (I think you) about the $20,000 subsidy, and I posted my DD-214 showing $28K+? I blacked out the record of service dates so it's not apparent. Anyway, the 34 week AIT ended Jul 82. It shows 10 years and 2 months as a 29V. That placed my discharge in September of 92 (9/28/92 to be exact.) That is before president Clinton was even elected. You assume I blame him?
Idiot.
When I spoke of the cuts enacted by president Clinton, I meant the additional cuts that went beyond any reasonable cuts. He devastated out military.
I'm not sure what you are referring to here unless you mean the RLP antennas. They operated on a 3 to 30 MHz frequency, shortwave radio communications. Yes, obsolete for day to day communications, but the concept is that in case of a nuclear war, the EMP (electromagnetic pulse) will wipe out conventional communications systems using transistors and integrated circuits. We even used a tube based microwave radio and multiplexer for our link to Command and Control!
You claimed the troops died from bad kharma for exercising their right to free speech. so go yourself
YOu made it clear that clinton was tied to your stupid position cut. eat .
I'm suggesting you go back to a time where what you say might matter. PreWWII?
Show me the quote or shut the up.
Show me the quote or shut the up.
Whatever. At least that suggection is an opinion instead of you exposing your ignorance.
1. I urge anyone to go to GGA's thread about soldiers op-ed piece to keep this republican in a can.
2. Digging in your garbage smells.
3. Learn how to spell.
Attack--- Attack--- Attack. Is that all you know how to do?
You cannot find those quotes you accuse me with...
Can you say SLANDER...
That's all you are. A petty slanderer.
Like I said, find those quotes, or shut up. If all you can do is find fault in those you disagree with, you are worthless to debate with.
Facts please.
Do you even know what a fact is?
manny has managed to have both the face of a donkey and a . He's Donkey- face McFugly.
Well I have it wrong then. I thought he was sucking off the democrats icon.
wc, go yourself
with your rabbit ears
Pixel Pusher es una grande panocha!
Dije yo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Some of these trolls just need to stay in the troll forum.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
