Reply With Quote
"run run run Cheney's havin fun!"
Cheney: US will not let Iran go nuclear. Part of article:
If Iran continues on its current course, Cheney said the U.S. and other nations are prepared to take action. The vice president made no specific reference to military action.
"We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," he said.
"run run run Cheney's havin fun!"
Meh. For those of us who knew what a soup sandwich Iraq would be, this kind of promotes an incredible sense of deja vu.
I don't care if Iran gets nukes.
Dead-gum-it. How come all you "let's get Iran" folks are so
set against "let's get Iran" Cheney?
How come?
Well ray it is the who got us into the unecessary war. fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me.. ever heard of that?
Oh, I see if Cheney says it, it is wrong. If your bunch says it
it is okay. Got it. Which way do you go. With your bunch or
with my bunch. They both say the same thing.
You have problems with computers, don't you. You know
like learning how to size your post.
Really not surprised.
Just going by his track record, that is an accurate statement.Oh, I see if Cheney says it, it is wrong.
Just wanted to get you on record.
You know how Cheney is. So dead-gum dumb. How much
was it he made with Haliburton?
Oh, did you know Rush put the letter Mr. Reid wrote in
a Haliburton brief case. Made a point about it. Wonder
why?
he's a pro at not putting himself in harms way.
There is a vast gulf between stupidity and guile.
I have no doubt Cheney is not stupid. I have every doubt that anything he says is true anymore.
I do.
Signed,
Israel
I do too.
Signed,
xrayzebra
P.S. You better to, if you really care about your country,
freedom and religion.
“Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.” - Cheney 8/26/2002
That's the kind of record of which I speak.
I think he had WMD too.
signed,
25,000 Kurds
and Many Iranians who lost their lives.
Prior to March 2003, Hillary believed that too.
I do not mean "15 years ago."
Signed,
The word "now"
And you believe everything she says too, right?
You trust here explicitly and implicitly.
She could never be wrong in your eyes.
No in ChumpDumper we trust. He knows all, sees all
and hears all. He is the all knowing. And besides that
he hates Bush and Cheney and is a yellow dog dimm-o-crap.
is your new prescription everclear? seriously, all over the place today.
We will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly... (in) weeks rather than months.” – Vice President Cheney [3/16/03]“The notion that it would take several hundred thousand American troops just seems outlandish.” -Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, [3/4/03]“There can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more…Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent. That is enough agent to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets.” – Colin Powell, 2/5/03“Saddam has amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of biological weapons, including Anthrax, botulism, toxins and possibly smallpox. He's amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons, including VX, Sarin and mus gas.” - Don Rumsfeld, 9/19/02“The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons…And according to the British government, the Iraqi regime could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes.” – President Bush, 9/26/02“Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.” - Vice President Cheney, 8/26/02
“Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mus and VX nerve agent.” – President Bush, 1/28/03“We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories.” -President Bush, on locating the mobile biological weapons labs, 5/29/03“We know where the [WMD] are.” - Don Rumsfeld, 3/30/03““I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it now.” - Colin Powell, 5/4/03Evidence indicates that Iraq is recons uting its nuclear weapons program…Iraq could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year.” - President Bush, 10/7/02“Saddam is actively pursuing nuclear weapons at this time.” - V.P. Cheney, 3/24/02“We do know that Saddam is actively pursuing a nuclear weapon.” - National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 9/10/02“The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quan ies of uranium from Africa.” – President Bush, 1/28/03"“We found the weapons of mass destruction.” – President Bush, 5/29/03We know where the WMDs are.” – Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 3/30/03“The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.” – President Bush, 3/19/03There's overwhelming evidence there was a connection between al Qaeda and the Iraqi government. I am very confident that there was an established relationship there." - Vice President Cheney, 1/22/04“The regime of Saddam Hussein cultivated ties to terror while it built weapons of mass destruction.” - President Bush's UN speech, 9/23/03“Iraq [is] the central front in the war on terror.” -President Bush's UN speech, 9/23/03“You can't distinguish between al-Qaida and Saddam.” President Bush, 9/25/02“There's no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties.” – President Bush, 9/17/03
I know more than you, which admittedly isn't saying much.
And I vote for Republicans and Democrats in every election.
Hey George, how 'bout some Democrat quotes from that time period...
The Democrats didn't give the order to invade, but their cowardice in abdicating their cons utional responsibilities is well do ented.
well considering bush was the guy who decided to start the war i only posted his comments when he was 'certain.
On a side note I'm glad you inquired as to the democrats statements.
Would it be fair to say that Bush had more up to date intel than the dems did during the clinton administration?
Or are we to believe that we had 5 yr old intel we were relying on in order to go to war?
Would it be fair to assume tha Bush had more information at his disposal than did Congress? I would believe that the Commander in Cheif would have.
Would it be possible that Bush gave Congress what he wanted them to see?
Or could he conveniently leave out contradictory information of the evidence he provided them? Information that would cause Congress to re-think what a threat Saddam was? at the time
If Bush witheld any evidence would that be giving Congress everything they needed to vote him authorization to use force?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
