You do know that she was another infamous Dubya recess appointment, right?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/...lap/index.html
Let's see. We have a mortgage meltdown going on. The dollar is on its way to being the American peso. Border security still blows, no one is doing about illegal immigration. Social Security is on its downward spiral, oil is at record highs.
And yet they are worried about a ing Halloween costume. It's Halloween, damnit.
Useless s.
You do know that she was another infamous Dubya recess appointment, right?
I thought the economy was booming and everyone was sharing in it's prosperity?
It is.
Well, everyone, in the sense that more people than ever before are sharing in the prosperity. The sensational represents Americans that invested poorly.
Are there a lot of forclosures? Yes. But, there are a quite a few more people that owned homes on which to foreclose. Maybe they should have stayed as renters.
Even when you put them back in apartments and duplexes, there'll be more people owning their homes than in 2000.
Oh yeah, and before you start whining that the housing bust is throwing people on the street...
HUD: Number Of Homeless Down 12%
Yes, I realize that's for 2005-2006 but, I'm betting many of that 12% ended up with sub-prime mortgages and that, even with the bust, chronic homelessness will not rise by 12% this year. So, you have a net gain in the "chronically homed."
By the way, homelessness has dropped every year of the Bush presidency whihch, of course, belies another liberal article of faith...Homelessness increases under Republican administrations; well, at least it becomes more of a news topic under Republican administrations anyway.
Renaissance of the Homeless
Liberals gave Reagan a bum rap. They may do the same to President Bush.
I wonder if Congress is ready to take the blame for these
foreclosures? I doubt it. But they are the ones who told
mortgage companies to get these poor folks into homes so
they could share in the American dream of owning a home.
And they did and see what happened. Some more of
those expert politicians who know all.
with the free market and it'll bite your ass.
Every time, every time.![]()
'HUD: Number Of Homeless Down 12%'
Do you and your idol dubya support the troops:
"Surge Seen in Number of Homeless Veterans"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/08/us/08vets.html?hp
They went in to service because were poor and uneducated, not because they were "patriotic". They come out of the service poor and uneducated, and very often damaged physically and mentally. Is dubya taking the lead on this issue? Does dubya support the (ex) troops?
Only jerkoff shill like yoni would believe numbers from lying dubya's politicized, lying HUD.
no, no congress is to blame.![]()
there i saved xray a post.
"more people than ever before are sharing in the prosperity"
total lie
Yeah, but you didn't save me one...damnit.
99.4% of veterans have homes. That's a veterans homelessness rate of .6%, well below the national average. And, the number of total homeless on any given night is less than a million. Well, that’s not good, is it? If the government actually solves a problem, then the bureaucracy will have to go.
Enter the VA with its press release. Why 1-in-4 homeless people are veterans! From an AP story:
Tsunami? Try a drop in the bucket.
How many homeless vets are there? AP reported: “2005 data estimated that 194,254 homeless people out of 744,313 on any given night were veterans.”
There are 25 million veterans.
That means 99.4% of them have homes.
194,254 homeless vets are a problem. But, America is dealing with it.
The VA has a very serious program that is now in its 20th year. But AP reported the number of homeless vets has dropped only by 50,000 or so in that time.
The VA budget has nearly doubled on Bush’s watch. He sought $39.5 billion for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1 (the Democratic Congress has failed to meet the Sept. 30 deadline for sending even one of the 13 appropriations bills to the president — but that is a whole ’nother story).
It is cynically dishonest for VA bureaucrats to trot out this 1-in-4 statistic to shake down even more money. It makes it seem as though 1-in-4 veterans are homeless, when we are not.
Far from it.
The AP report on homeless vets:
I am glad that they are helping these veterans. But in seeking funding, must they portray all veterans as a bunch of homeless, drug-addicted losers?
The New York Times shamelessly and recklessly labeled its deceptive story: “Surge Seen in Number of Homeless Veterans.” The actual number has fallen.
So you're admitting it's a partisan witch hunt. Thanks for playing.
Personally, I'm doing great. For a lot of people, the economy is doing well. The oil situation and value of the dollar are legit concerns.
Outside of that, the other has been and will continue to be a problem until someone in D.C. grows a ing pair.
I think any poor treatment of our vets is cause for criticism, which Bush deserves for this.
I have to ask you though, where are Pelosi and her Democratic crew on this? Oh yeah, they're worried about stupid like what costume someone wore at a Halloween party.
why ask me about Pelosi and Dems? I'm not a Dem and don't support the Dems.
First I've heard you admit that.
At any rate, I don't care what side of the aisle they're on in D.C. (I guess I need to throw the independents in here too), I just want to see someone ing lead this country for once and address the concerns I mentioned in post 1, instead of worrying about stupid like Halloween costumes or all the inquiries that the Demos have been making about Bush and Rove since they took over last fall.
They're supposed to be there leading the country, not doing everything they can to speed up the process of us circling the drain.
I see they approved the 'Water Bill' today, nothing like a $14 billion bill with 9 billion in pork added *sigh*
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)