"holier than thou" sounds too biblical.
why don't you tell us about the dirt?
what kind of pie, this time?
what rigged debate and how was it rigged?
what rumor?
How come when a dimm-o-crap does something none of
our holier than thou folks never post it? Like
William Jefferson, (D) Louisiana gets caught once again with
his finger in the pie.
Hillary's debate in Nv is rigged from the git go isn't talked
about?
Or the "supposed" rumor about Obama is denied by
Hillary's folks, but Novak didn't talk to any Publicans about
it.
Well I could go on, but what is the point. I would guess
that this little post will be pushed to the bottome in not
time flat.
"holier than thou" sounds too biblical.
why don't you tell us about the dirt?
what kind of pie, this time?
what rigged debate and how was it rigged?
what rumor?
Just answer the question, not with another question.
Or do you not have that capability. It is in the news.
Or do you read the news?
sure, i read the news. still don't know what you're talking about.
so, you're just making up?
That's the reason you never make sense. Google it.
Not my job to get you up to speed.
so, you start and end a thread with empty old man blabbering?
why don't you just take a dump and frame it?
Nope I am telling you, you want challenge me, look it up.
In other words get off you butt and learn something.
I stand by my original post. Prove me wrong. Lazy!
google what? your opinion?
If Jefferson is found guilty then he should go to jail.
Is this the thread for ing about things without explaining why you're ing?
yes, if you're ing about it.
I don't understand why the board Democrats don't post about things they never heard of and about which they know nothing. The board neocons do it all the time.
Just proof you only listen to what the liberal media spoon feeds you.
Do some reasearch!
i tried. i googled " whats the old man ing about now". all i got was a story about a swimmer.
For William J. Jefferson, wiki has a great deal under corruption on him, and of course links at the bottom
wiki: Jefferson Corruption:
I'm not sure if something is newer, but this was not covered in the mainstream news like it would have been if he was a republican.On June 4, 2007 Jefferson was indicted on 16 counts in a 94-page indictment that included charges of racketeering, soliciting bribes, wire fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice, conspiracy and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. If convicted, he faces a possible maximum sentence of 235 years.
As for Hillary, it was discovered questions were planted in the audience at her campaign stops. Here's a search that leads to many articles, past and present:
Alta Vista Search "planted questions" and "clinton"
Now the thing with the dirt on Obama... Novak reported it, and he is very reliable in his stories. Too bad the MSM's don't want to give this story a chance:
Clinton Has Dirt on Obama; McCain to Skip Iowa?
Obama: Don't 'swift boat' me
Just an indicator to me the bias goes towards Hillary in the news.
^ thats a very good response.
where is the part of how this administration lied about saddams nuclear connection that led to the invasion? you know, the part that flushed this country down the bowl? you know, the part that sets off the chain reaction of other countries that realize we are a threat to everyone that may have something we want?
Now the thing with the dirt on Obama... Novak reported it, and he is very reliable in his stories. Too bad the MSM's don't want to give this story a chance:
First time I've seen Robert Novak and 'reliable' used in the same sentence. As proven by the whole Valarie Plame affair, Novak is a Neo-Con ....this was a old Nixon trick to try and trip up Obama...no matter how he reacted to Novak's baseless accusations, he looks weak...either he attacks Hitlary - which the M$M is busy portraying as the poor woman who all the mean DEMO men are picking on, or he doesn't...
I hate it when I find things "extreme funny" but not humorous. I get all conflicted and what not.
Some say thet the definition of insanity is doing the same thing again and expecting different results.
Can you please lay of the war for oil theory, or are you insane? Hasn't this been said and debated enough?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)