Reply With Quote
wouldn't that be a hoot..
http://www.judicialwatch.org/iraqi-oil-maps.shtml
head's still-secret 2001 US National Engergy Policy was "invade Iraq and take the oil". Anybody got any evidence to contrary?
I'm amazed that no one knowledgeable about that secret policy has spilled the beans, perhaps because they were all oilco and engeryco Repugs who could gain $Ms in personal income from Iraqi oil.
wouldn't that be a hoot..
It's a done deal. Dubya and Prime Minister Maliki have agreed to formalize an “accord” before July 2008 that will create “economic, political and security ties” between the two countries. Translation: permanent bases and US soldiers on the ground forever. It’s important to note the word “accord”. Usually this is done through a reciprocal treaty but treaties require Congressional aproval. With this “accord” Mr. Bush has saddled the United States with an open-ended commitment to a military presence in Iraq forever. That kinda’ kills the argument about how the next Democratic President will get us out of this civil war, doesn’t it?
My God man… Keep up. This is old 2003, 2004 stuff!
I've seen this discussed and debunked as for the context you portray before. This was nothing more than a list of negotiations with the area as of that date. Older do ents can be found under the Clinton administration as well.
The do ents did not originate from the Vice President's office, but from The Commerce Department.
If you wish to contend this was a prelude to attack for oil, then remember it started before president Clinton's time as president. Some of the dates within the do ents are from the 80's.
Clinton didn't invade Iraq for oil
(perhaps he was too pre-occupied being witch-hunted by foaming-mouth Repugs)
dubya did invade Iraq for oil.
Can you see any difference?
Yeah, sure boutons, he had a problem with a blue dress
and something under his desk. Damn foaming-mouth
Lew........Republicans.
well xray your clinton source ' morris' has said in the past that clinton was hampered by the right's continual harassment. he also stated that clinton wanted to do certain things militarily to Saddam and other terrorists but was afraid that the GOP would claim he was wagging the dog because of his problems with them.. So since Morris is a good source on Hillary we can assume he is a good source for Bill as well..
'was afraid that the GOP would claim he was wagging the dog because of his problems with them."
... which is exactly what the Repugs did when Clinton fired Cruises at OBL (aka being "tough on terror"), while the rest of the country basically said "who TF is OBL and why are we shooting cruises at him"
Last edited by boutons_; 11-28-2007 at 01:28 PM.
Like they were going to before this.
Does that change the facts? That Clinton had oral sex
with an intern and a blue dress proved this fact? Who
was wagging what?
Ok. So I guess you agree that the witch hunt hampered a President's ability to defend this country.
Nope, don't think so. No witch hunt when he did the deed.
No just once but many times, even one time when he
was talking on the telephone.
I will concede he has lots of control when he can have sex
and talk on the phone at the same time. But couldn't
handle his personal life while "trying" to handle the people's business. What is wrong with this picture?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
