Reply With Quote
Yeah that was great...hopefully it will help him tomorrow!
it was awesome
Yeah that was great...hopefully it will help him tomorrow!
could you give any less of a descriptive account
Ron Paul has a lot of run, but he has no money and no chance.
Not only was Ron Awesome! Leno was pretty cool too!
Dammit, I missed it. allergies for making me fall asleep early.
Honest question...
Do you live in a bubble?
Paul has how much $$ vs Romney ($17M spent of his own $350M) or McCain?
A couple months ago, I posted a report that Paul has $00.00 from the corps.
Obama and Hillary have over $100M. dubya burned through over $200M in 2000.
So how much does Paul have? Effectively NO money
Last edited by boutons_; 01-08-2008 at 11:51 AM.
It was just the norm.
An interview with no substance.
I would have loved for him to discuss his libertarian views and bust the dems for the they are wanting to pull.
Last edited by BonnerDynasty; 01-08-2008 at 11:18 AM.
I don't know what's up with this guy. I totally agree with his views on the Welfare State and so do most republicans, but instead of talking about that during the republican debate all he could talk about was his foreign policy. o McFly, know thy audience.
Looks like Paul's pooch is screwed.
Ron Paul Bigotry Revolution
A damning New Republic expose on Ron Paul shows the “libertarian” Republican candidate to be a racist, a phobe and an anti-Semite.
So why don't you like him then?
Many reasons, these among them. However, the bigger question is why some on this board do like him.
Now up to 1000 to one to win Presidency.
Can you say Pat Buchanon Circa 96'?
Today, as New Hampshire voters headed to the polls, The New Republic published an article carefully timed to hurt Ron Paul.
This article rehashes an old issue of quotations from newsletters published under Dr. Paul's name, but not edited by him. Dr. Paul takes full responsibility, as he has for over a decade, for failing to adequately monitor the words that went out under his name.
You and I know that Dr. Paul's message of freedom is about individual liberty, and that liberty is the best antidote to racism. If anyone has doubts, I would encourage them to read Dr. Paul's issue page on racism.
Dr. Paul's response to the article is posted here. As you would expect, Congressman Paul denounces racism and embraces instead, the hopeful message of freedom -- the message he has championed for decades.
Sincerely,
Kent Snyder
Chairman, Ron Paul 2008
So he didn't edit his own newsletter? OK, seems a bit odd that he wouldn't edit the newsletter with his own name on it, but sure, I can buy that.
He apparently didn't actually read his own newsletter either? OK, that's kind of a reach, but I'm sure Ron Paul was a busy man and couldn't peruse through every single newsletter.
In the 10+ years the newsletter was being released, nobody who did read the newsletter bothered to tell Ron Paul that they contained racist, hateful and downright crazy statements? Really? 10+ years and nobody noticed that? That fact never managed to reach Ron Paul? Despite several articles being written in the first-person from Dr. Paul's perspective; he had no idea of the kind of content in the 10+ years of his newsletter? Really?
I also wonder how many Ron Paul supporters actually read or will read the entire The New Republic article (http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.ht...5-4532a7da84ca) and Ron Paul newsletter scans (http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.ht...3-de262573a129). I'm guessing most wont allow themselves to be exposed to something critical of their nominee, instead choosing to spam every message board, blog, comments section and so on with whatever message of the day they receive from their hive leader or whichever combination of the words Ron Paul, Cons ution, neo-cons, corporations and federal government they can come up with. Feel free to surprise me with a critical defense of the newsletters though, I'm actually interested in hearing the thoughts of people on "the other side".
Ron paul is a in rascist
Marcus Bryant is the most insincere pretentious country club republican who claims to be "above the frey". When in fact he just has some insecurity issues to say what he really feels. He wasn't like this in the past. He was an unashamed Aggie, but since he went to UT, his balls have shrunk and now he tries to be carefull with which side he picks in a debate, that way he doesn't feel like a complete bigot. He even resorts to calling others "bigots" to make him feel better about his low life anglo saxon, self deprecating, low selfworth, guilt ridden, aryan bag existance.
He was easier to sympathize with when the Victoria Chamber of Commerce threatened him with a release of his pictures showing his face covered in zygote jelly.
Rawfl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Someone needs a hobby. Or a woman. Maybe both.
I agree with Paul on some domestic issues...mainly from a libeterian standpoint.
However, I DO NOT think he would be an effective President. Congress will not tag along with such drastic change. In a sense it's a bit too radical. I don't like his approach either, it's too rebellious. I suppose he did this to stand out, which is fine, it just doesn't appeal to me. The best change is change which occurs slowly and methodically. Take evolution for example (not specifically the human species, but all species)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
