For the loser that backs a never-was team and needed a dictionary...explain why Bird's Celtics are called a dynasty having never-ever-won-a-back-to-back?
![]()
If you know the answer to that, it's the same reason it applies to the Spurs.
dy·nas·ty /ˈdaɪnəsti; Brit. also ˈdɪnəsti/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[dahy-nuh-stee; Brit. also din-uh-stee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -ties.
1. a sequence of rulers from the same family, stock, or group: the Ming dynasty.
2. the rule of such a sequence.
3. a series of members of a family who are distinguished for their success, wealth, etc.
I bolded the parts you needed to comprehend the most. Do I need to go on further? Sterne is a moron for calling you guys a "dynasty" and you guys are morons if you believe that yourselves.
Thank you for your time Spurs fans! Just wanted to clarify.
![]()
For the loser that backs a never-was team and needed a dictionary...explain why Bird's Celtics are called a dynasty having never-ever-won-a-back-to-back?
![]()
If you know the answer to that, it's the same reason it applies to the Spurs.
Well, whatever it is, it's more than the Suns have ever done.
Thanks for whining about your teams on the spursboard though. We appreciate the support.
A Sun Fan talking championship smack.
I've now seen it all.
Oh damn. I've seen a non-dynasty win 4 les in 9 years?
Man, what a waste of my time!!
mo·ron mawr-on
–noun
1. a person who is notably stupid or lacking in good judgment.
2. Psychology. a person of borderline intelligence in a former classification of mental re ation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69.
This applies to stupid sons fan that starts a stupid thread at spurs fan site.
Thanks for your time jack ass.
Dear TrajicMan...
Try to comprehend this...
SPURS: FOUR CHAMPIONSHIPS IN NINE SEASONS.
SUNS: ZERO CHAMPIONSHIPS IN 40+ YEARS.
Thank you for your time, TrajicMan. Just wanted to re-introduce you to reality.![]()
That still doesn't make you a dynasty. Dynasties rule in sequence or successions. Spurs are still one and done and by sports standards probably three in a row would be called a dynasty.
The obsession continues.
One and done?
That would be a team like Portland or Seattle or Washington.
4>1
The Spurs have won more games than anyone else in the NBA for the past decade. . . I guess that kind of sustained, perhaps even sequential success, mixed in with four isn't a dynasty. I'm going to lose so much sleep over that.
Go easy on him. He can't count.
He is a Suns fan after all. Don't overload him with facts, it might confuse him.
I'll take 4 championships in 9 seasons any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
No Suns fan has the authority to define what a dynasty is. Lakers, Celtics, and Bulls fans reserve the authority to comment on that. Now, if I want to consult an authority on what "soft" is, or what "lack of poise" is, or what "mental weakness" is, or what "a city of crybaby es" looks like, then it's time to look up Suns fan.
By your myopic thinking, the PHOENIX MURCURY will be a dynasty before the Suns ever catch a glimpse of the Lawrence O'Brien trophy... unless the Maricopa County D.A. sues the Spurs for visitation rights.![]()
Don't need the Spurs to be a dynasty. I'd rather be 4-time Champs without being called a Dynasty then anything else.
It seems like you're trying to insult Spurs fans here but that's gayer then b/c it's like talking to a guy who only has 100 million dollars to his name rather then 150
And you act like it's a bad thing![]()
I was going to try a witty, creative retort to your ironically petty "lesson" to all us Spurs fans on what a true dynasty was. But then I decided that simplicity would be more effective, so why don't you freeze a piece of your own and go yourself with it?
You're eight years late pal on being able to call the Spurs "One and Done".
I see another one of our morons, I mean supporters, has made it to your board. Do you know who this "Sterne" fellow is he talks about?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)